可持续建设和平中的宽恕、恢复性司法与和解:当代辩论和未来可能性

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Global Change Peace & Security Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226
J. Boehle
{"title":"可持续建设和平中的宽恕、恢复性司法与和解:当代辩论和未来可能性","authors":"J. Boehle","doi":"10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the mid 1990s, growing attention has been given in the scholarly debate and in the public sphere to forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in peacebuilding. These concepts have been reflected upon and highlighted as core components of restoring right relationships and in sustainable peacebuilding: at first focusing mainly on individuals and relations between them and later as well on relations of communities and states in the public sphere. Attempts to better understand forgiveness and reconciliation in relation to peacebuilding have to address also the critical issue of how to safeguard and integrate processes of justice into peace processes. After first clarifying the distinction between retributive and restorative justice, this article considers core findings of Daniel Philpott, John Paul Lederach and Leonel Narvaez in their peacebuilding studies and considers selected, contemporary reconciliation and peace initiatives. The article argues that forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation processes should be further mainstreamed and integrated as part of any standard response to major conflicts and wars by national political bodies, religious communities and religious/secular NGOs, international organisations, agencies and institutions: in order to positively and sustainably resolve and transform conflicts, wars and violence between groups, and to build sustainable peace.","PeriodicalId":44867,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Peace & Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in sustainable peacebuilding: contemporary debates and future possibilities\",\"authors\":\"J. Boehle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since the mid 1990s, growing attention has been given in the scholarly debate and in the public sphere to forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in peacebuilding. These concepts have been reflected upon and highlighted as core components of restoring right relationships and in sustainable peacebuilding: at first focusing mainly on individuals and relations between them and later as well on relations of communities and states in the public sphere. Attempts to better understand forgiveness and reconciliation in relation to peacebuilding have to address also the critical issue of how to safeguard and integrate processes of justice into peace processes. After first clarifying the distinction between retributive and restorative justice, this article considers core findings of Daniel Philpott, John Paul Lederach and Leonel Narvaez in their peacebuilding studies and considers selected, contemporary reconciliation and peace initiatives. The article argues that forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation processes should be further mainstreamed and integrated as part of any standard response to major conflicts and wars by national political bodies, religious communities and religious/secular NGOs, international organisations, agencies and institutions: in order to positively and sustainably resolve and transform conflicts, wars and violence between groups, and to build sustainable peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Peace & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要自20世纪90年代中期以来,学术辩论和公共领域越来越关注建设和平中的宽恕、恢复性司法与和解。这些概念被反映和强调为恢复正确关系和可持续建设和平的核心组成部分:起初主要关注个人及其之间的关系,后来主要关注社区和国家在公共领域的关系。为了更好地理解与建设和平有关的宽恕与和解,还必须解决如何保障司法进程并将其纳入和平进程这一关键问题。在首先澄清了报复性司法和恢复性司法之间的区别之后,本文考虑了Daniel Philpott、John Paul Lederach和Leonel Narvaez在建设和平研究中的核心发现,并考虑了选定的当代和解与和平倡议。文章认为,国家政治机构、宗教团体和宗教/世俗非政府组织、国际组织、机构和机构应对重大冲突和战争的任何标准措施都应进一步将宽恕、恢复性司法和和解进程纳入主流并加以整合:,团体之间的战争和暴力,以及建设可持续和平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in sustainable peacebuilding: contemporary debates and future possibilities
ABSTRACT Since the mid 1990s, growing attention has been given in the scholarly debate and in the public sphere to forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in peacebuilding. These concepts have been reflected upon and highlighted as core components of restoring right relationships and in sustainable peacebuilding: at first focusing mainly on individuals and relations between them and later as well on relations of communities and states in the public sphere. Attempts to better understand forgiveness and reconciliation in relation to peacebuilding have to address also the critical issue of how to safeguard and integrate processes of justice into peace processes. After first clarifying the distinction between retributive and restorative justice, this article considers core findings of Daniel Philpott, John Paul Lederach and Leonel Narvaez in their peacebuilding studies and considers selected, contemporary reconciliation and peace initiatives. The article argues that forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation processes should be further mainstreamed and integrated as part of any standard response to major conflicts and wars by national political bodies, religious communities and religious/secular NGOs, international organisations, agencies and institutions: in order to positively and sustainably resolve and transform conflicts, wars and violence between groups, and to build sustainable peace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Peace & Security
Global Change Peace & Security POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Mujeres y discursos de paz en la historiaBy María Elena DíezJorge, Cándida MartínezLópez (Eds.). Berlin: Peter Lang, 2023. ISBN 978‐3‐631‐88221‐4 An Army Afire: How the US Army Confronted its Racial Crisis in the Vietnam Era By BethBailey. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2023 Unofficial Peace Diplomacy: Private Peace Entrepreneurs in Conflict Resolution ProcessesBy LiorLehrs. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2022 Six Stops on the National Security Tour: Rethinking warfare economiesMiriamPemberton, New York: Routledge. 2022 Virtual prayers and real violence: Religion as a resource in challenging times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1