对难民儿童的多元文化语言干预

Q4 Social Sciences Word of Mouth Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.1177/10483950221136353c
C. Westby, Elizabeth Biersgreen
{"title":"对难民儿童的多元文化语言干预","authors":"C. Westby, Elizabeth Biersgreen","doi":"10.1177/10483950221136353c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"risk (i.e., low, medium, high) and stressor domain (i.e., resettlement, acculturation, isolation, trauma). Interactive components accompany didactic content to support learning and knowledge transfer in assessment and treatment planning that is relevant for all providers supporting mental health, well-being, and education. The RICST includes (a) an overview of the Four Core Stressors framework; (b) stressor-specific educational content and sample guiding questions; (c) scaffolding to assess refugee/immigrant youth on a spectrum of low–moderate–high risk for each stressor; (d) specific intervention suggestions and strategies for the provided risk assessment (e.g., interventions for youth rated moderate-risk for traumatic stress); and (e) user feedback and usability questions at the end. Table 1 shows the four core stressors framework with stressorspecific educational content and sample guiding questions to explore each stressor. Following educational content and guiding questions related to each stressor, service providers are given a risk assessment table that provides specific examples for how youth who are low, moderate, and high risk within a given stressor may present. Anchors for each level of risk relate to whether a given stressor interferes with youth functioning at school, at home, and in social situations and/or how a stressor detracts from the safety of the youth’s social environment. A low-risk rating indicates a high level of functioning and/or a safe social environment, medium risk indicates diminished functioning and/or a distressed social environment, and high risk indicates severe impairment in functioning and/or a threatening social environment. Service providers are then prompted to select the level of risk for that particular stressor: low, moderate, or high risk. Use of the RICST can facilitate SLPs’ ability to understand a child’s demonstrated function and make decisions regarding the types of services needed. After selecting a risk rating, service providers are presented with intervention strategies specific to the stressor and the risk rating. Intervention strategies commonly encourage collaboration with other services, schools, community members, and/or cultural brokers. The results of the RICST can be printed to share with team members. No assessment of any child should be done in isolation, but this is especially true for immigrant/refugee children. The SLPs need to see the “big picture” of the child’s life.","PeriodicalId":39491,"journal":{"name":"Word of Mouth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multiliteracy Language Intervention for Refugee Children\",\"authors\":\"C. Westby, Elizabeth Biersgreen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10483950221136353c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"risk (i.e., low, medium, high) and stressor domain (i.e., resettlement, acculturation, isolation, trauma). Interactive components accompany didactic content to support learning and knowledge transfer in assessment and treatment planning that is relevant for all providers supporting mental health, well-being, and education. The RICST includes (a) an overview of the Four Core Stressors framework; (b) stressor-specific educational content and sample guiding questions; (c) scaffolding to assess refugee/immigrant youth on a spectrum of low–moderate–high risk for each stressor; (d) specific intervention suggestions and strategies for the provided risk assessment (e.g., interventions for youth rated moderate-risk for traumatic stress); and (e) user feedback and usability questions at the end. Table 1 shows the four core stressors framework with stressorspecific educational content and sample guiding questions to explore each stressor. Following educational content and guiding questions related to each stressor, service providers are given a risk assessment table that provides specific examples for how youth who are low, moderate, and high risk within a given stressor may present. Anchors for each level of risk relate to whether a given stressor interferes with youth functioning at school, at home, and in social situations and/or how a stressor detracts from the safety of the youth’s social environment. A low-risk rating indicates a high level of functioning and/or a safe social environment, medium risk indicates diminished functioning and/or a distressed social environment, and high risk indicates severe impairment in functioning and/or a threatening social environment. Service providers are then prompted to select the level of risk for that particular stressor: low, moderate, or high risk. Use of the RICST can facilitate SLPs’ ability to understand a child’s demonstrated function and make decisions regarding the types of services needed. After selecting a risk rating, service providers are presented with intervention strategies specific to the stressor and the risk rating. Intervention strategies commonly encourage collaboration with other services, schools, community members, and/or cultural brokers. The results of the RICST can be printed to share with team members. No assessment of any child should be done in isolation, but this is especially true for immigrant/refugee children. The SLPs need to see the “big picture” of the child’s life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Word of Mouth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Word of Mouth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221136353c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word of Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221136353c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险(即低、中、高)和压力源领域(即重新安置、文化适应、隔离、创伤)。互动组件伴随着教学内容,以支持评估和治疗计划中的学习和知识转移,这与支持心理健康、幸福感和教育的所有提供者相关。RICST包括(a)四大核心压力源框架概述;(b) 针对压力源的教育内容和样本指导问题;(c) 评估难民/移民青年每种压力源的低-中-高风险的脚手架;(d) 针对所提供的风险评估的具体干预建议和策略(例如,针对创伤压力中等风险青年的干预措施);以及(e)最后的用户反馈和可用性问题。表1显示了四个核心压力源框架,其中包括针对压力的教育内容和探索每个压力源的样本指导问题。根据与每种压力源相关的教育内容和指导性问题,向服务提供商提供了一份风险评估表,该表提供了特定压力源中低、中、高风险青年可能表现的具体例子。每种风险水平的锚定因素都与特定的压力源是否干扰青年在学校、家庭和社交场合的功能有关,和/或压力源如何损害青年社会环境的安全有关。低风险评级表示功能水平高和/或社会环境安全,中等风险表示功能减弱和/或不良社会环境,高风险表示功能严重受损和/或威胁性社会环境。然后,服务提供者会被提示选择特定压力源的风险水平:低风险、中等风险或高风险。RICST的使用可以促进SLP理解儿童所展示的功能并就所需服务类型做出决定的能力。在选择风险评级后,向服务提供商提供针对压力源和风险评级的干预策略。干预策略通常鼓励与其他服务机构、学校、社区成员和/或文化经纪人合作。RICST的结果可以打印出来与团队成员共享。不应孤立地对任何儿童进行评估,但移民/难民儿童尤其如此。SLP需要看到孩子生活的“全貌”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Multiliteracy Language Intervention for Refugee Children
risk (i.e., low, medium, high) and stressor domain (i.e., resettlement, acculturation, isolation, trauma). Interactive components accompany didactic content to support learning and knowledge transfer in assessment and treatment planning that is relevant for all providers supporting mental health, well-being, and education. The RICST includes (a) an overview of the Four Core Stressors framework; (b) stressor-specific educational content and sample guiding questions; (c) scaffolding to assess refugee/immigrant youth on a spectrum of low–moderate–high risk for each stressor; (d) specific intervention suggestions and strategies for the provided risk assessment (e.g., interventions for youth rated moderate-risk for traumatic stress); and (e) user feedback and usability questions at the end. Table 1 shows the four core stressors framework with stressorspecific educational content and sample guiding questions to explore each stressor. Following educational content and guiding questions related to each stressor, service providers are given a risk assessment table that provides specific examples for how youth who are low, moderate, and high risk within a given stressor may present. Anchors for each level of risk relate to whether a given stressor interferes with youth functioning at school, at home, and in social situations and/or how a stressor detracts from the safety of the youth’s social environment. A low-risk rating indicates a high level of functioning and/or a safe social environment, medium risk indicates diminished functioning and/or a distressed social environment, and high risk indicates severe impairment in functioning and/or a threatening social environment. Service providers are then prompted to select the level of risk for that particular stressor: low, moderate, or high risk. Use of the RICST can facilitate SLPs’ ability to understand a child’s demonstrated function and make decisions regarding the types of services needed. After selecting a risk rating, service providers are presented with intervention strategies specific to the stressor and the risk rating. Intervention strategies commonly encourage collaboration with other services, schools, community members, and/or cultural brokers. The results of the RICST can be printed to share with team members. No assessment of any child should be done in isolation, but this is especially true for immigrant/refugee children. The SLPs need to see the “big picture” of the child’s life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ...helps frontline clinicians keep up with the latest trends in working with school-age children. Each 16-page issue of bare-bones, down-to-earth information includes reviews, resources, idea swap, and short bits.
期刊最新文献
Using Conversation to Promote Language for Comprehension Syntactic Factors in Stuttering Bundle of Learning Chatbots and Neurodivergence Learning to Explain and Generalize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1