能量摄入和认知功能的时间模式及其下降:中国一项基于社区的队列研究

Hui Chen, Y. Tao, Min-Dian Li, Yuxuan Gu, Jiaxi Yang, You Wu, Dongmei Yu, Changzheng Yuan
{"title":"能量摄入和认知功能的时间模式及其下降:中国一项基于社区的队列研究","authors":"Hui Chen, Y. Tao, Min-Dian Li, Yuxuan Gu, Jiaxi Yang, You Wu, Dongmei Yu, Changzheng Yuan","doi":"10.1093/lifemeta/loac011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To our knowledge, this study is one of the few population-based studies that explore the association of TPEI and cognitive decline, although accumulating studies have linked TPEI to health outcomes, including obesity [8], hypertension [9], and cardiovascular health [10]. Emerging studies suggested that meal timing is associated with cognitive function. An experimental study showed that evenly spreading the same amount of energy into four meals can improve short-term cognitive performance than that of two meals [11]. Another meta-analysis [12] including 34 experimental studies showed that breakfast skipping is related to worse acute cognitive function among healthy adults than breakfast consumers. Our findings were generally consistent with prior evidence, showing that breakfast skipping was associated with exceptionally faster cognitive decline than other TPEIs, corroborated by the secondary finding that higher energy intakes in the morning were associated with better cognitive function and slower decline. For snack intake, we observed that only snacks consumed after dinner exhibited a potentially beneficial role, most likely resulting from the fact that people who consumed snacks at night usually used to be brain workers with higher education levels and tended to have a better cognitive function. Our findings should be placed in the context of China's rapid transitions in eating habits, where accessibility of food choices as snacks may vary significantly across populations. In conclusion, we observed that maintaining balanced energy intake across three major meals was associated with significantly better cognitive function than the other five unevenly-distributed patterns. In particular, breakfast skipping was associated with significantly worse cognitive function and faster cognitive decline over time. The observed associations were similar across major prespecified subgroups. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings in different populations and reveal the underlying mechanisms. If proven causal, these findings will add to the evidence for future public health recommendations on balanced temporal pattern of energy intake for primary prevention of cognitive decline in the aging population.","PeriodicalId":74074,"journal":{"name":"Life metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal patterns of energy intake and cognitive function and its decline: a community-based cohort study in China\",\"authors\":\"Hui Chen, Y. Tao, Min-Dian Li, Yuxuan Gu, Jiaxi Yang, You Wu, Dongmei Yu, Changzheng Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lifemeta/loac011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To our knowledge, this study is one of the few population-based studies that explore the association of TPEI and cognitive decline, although accumulating studies have linked TPEI to health outcomes, including obesity [8], hypertension [9], and cardiovascular health [10]. Emerging studies suggested that meal timing is associated with cognitive function. An experimental study showed that evenly spreading the same amount of energy into four meals can improve short-term cognitive performance than that of two meals [11]. Another meta-analysis [12] including 34 experimental studies showed that breakfast skipping is related to worse acute cognitive function among healthy adults than breakfast consumers. Our findings were generally consistent with prior evidence, showing that breakfast skipping was associated with exceptionally faster cognitive decline than other TPEIs, corroborated by the secondary finding that higher energy intakes in the morning were associated with better cognitive function and slower decline. For snack intake, we observed that only snacks consumed after dinner exhibited a potentially beneficial role, most likely resulting from the fact that people who consumed snacks at night usually used to be brain workers with higher education levels and tended to have a better cognitive function. Our findings should be placed in the context of China's rapid transitions in eating habits, where accessibility of food choices as snacks may vary significantly across populations. In conclusion, we observed that maintaining balanced energy intake across three major meals was associated with significantly better cognitive function than the other five unevenly-distributed patterns. In particular, breakfast skipping was associated with significantly worse cognitive function and faster cognitive decline over time. The observed associations were similar across major prespecified subgroups. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings in different populations and reveal the underlying mechanisms. If proven causal, these findings will add to the evidence for future public health recommendations on balanced temporal pattern of energy intake for primary prevention of cognitive decline in the aging population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lifemeta/loac011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lifemeta/loac011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据我们所知,这项研究是为数不多的探索TPEI与认知能力下降之间关系的基于人群的研究之一,尽管越来越多的研究将TPEI与健康结果联系起来,包括肥胖[8]、高血压[9]和心血管健康[10]。新出现的研究表明,用餐时间与认知功能有关。一项实验研究表明,与两顿饭相比,将相同量的能量均匀地分散到四顿饭中可以提高短期认知能力[11]。另一项包括34项实验研究的荟萃分析[12]表明,与早餐消费者相比,健康成年人不吃早餐与更差的急性认知功能有关。我们的研究结果与先前的证据基本一致,表明不吃早餐与认知能力下降速度比其他TPEI更快有关,第二项发现证实了这一点,即早上摄入的能量越多,认知功能越好,下降速度越慢。对于零食的摄入,我们观察到,只有晚饭后吃的零食才具有潜在的有益作用,这很可能是因为晚上吃零食的人过去通常是受过高等教育的脑力劳动者,往往具有更好的认知功能。我们的研究结果应该放在中国饮食习惯快速转变的背景下,在中国,作为零食的食物选择的可及性可能因人口而异。总之,我们观察到,与其他五种分布不均的模式相比,在三顿大餐中保持平衡的能量摄入与显著更好的认知功能有关。特别是,随着时间的推移,不吃早餐会导致认知功能显著下降,认知能力下降速度加快。观察到的关联在主要的预先指定的亚组中是相似的。需要进一步的研究来证实我们在不同人群中的发现,并揭示潜在的机制。如果被证明是因果关系,这些发现将为未来的公共卫生建议增加证据,这些建议涉及能量摄入的平衡时间模式,以初步预防老龄化人群的认知能力下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal patterns of energy intake and cognitive function and its decline: a community-based cohort study in China
To our knowledge, this study is one of the few population-based studies that explore the association of TPEI and cognitive decline, although accumulating studies have linked TPEI to health outcomes, including obesity [8], hypertension [9], and cardiovascular health [10]. Emerging studies suggested that meal timing is associated with cognitive function. An experimental study showed that evenly spreading the same amount of energy into four meals can improve short-term cognitive performance than that of two meals [11]. Another meta-analysis [12] including 34 experimental studies showed that breakfast skipping is related to worse acute cognitive function among healthy adults than breakfast consumers. Our findings were generally consistent with prior evidence, showing that breakfast skipping was associated with exceptionally faster cognitive decline than other TPEIs, corroborated by the secondary finding that higher energy intakes in the morning were associated with better cognitive function and slower decline. For snack intake, we observed that only snacks consumed after dinner exhibited a potentially beneficial role, most likely resulting from the fact that people who consumed snacks at night usually used to be brain workers with higher education levels and tended to have a better cognitive function. Our findings should be placed in the context of China's rapid transitions in eating habits, where accessibility of food choices as snacks may vary significantly across populations. In conclusion, we observed that maintaining balanced energy intake across three major meals was associated with significantly better cognitive function than the other five unevenly-distributed patterns. In particular, breakfast skipping was associated with significantly worse cognitive function and faster cognitive decline over time. The observed associations were similar across major prespecified subgroups. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings in different populations and reveal the underlying mechanisms. If proven causal, these findings will add to the evidence for future public health recommendations on balanced temporal pattern of energy intake for primary prevention of cognitive decline in the aging population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Senescent glia-bridging neuronal mitochondrial dysfunction and lipid accumulation in aging. Gut bacterial metabolism produces neuroactive steroids in pregnant women Potential therapeutic strategies for MASH: from preclinical to clinical development Immuno-electron microscopy localizes Caenorhabditis elegans vitellogenins along the classic exocytosis route Protecting liver health with microbial-derived succinylated bile acids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1