{"title":"欧洲风暴损失的长期记录及其与标准气候指数的比较","authors":"S. Cusack","doi":"10.5194/nhess-23-2841-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Traditional insurance has both a great exposure to decadal variations in\nEuropean storm activity and the ability to adjust its business strategy\nover these timescales. Hence, the recent development of skilful predictions\nof multiannual mean European winter climate seems a very welcome addition to\nthe long list of ways that researchers have improved management of windstorm\nrisk. Yet companies do not use these forecasts of mean winter climate to\nadjust their view of risk. The main reason is the lack of a long, reliable\nrecord of losses to understand how forecasted time-mean circulation\nanomalies relate to the damage from a few, intense storms. This study fills\nthat gap with a European windstorm loss record from 1950 to 2022, based on\nERA5 peak near-surface winds per event which were converted to losses using\nan established damage function. The resulting dataset successfully\nidentifies major storms over the past 70 years and simulates the\nmultidecadal variations from low values in the 1960s up to high levels in\nthe 1980s and 1990s then down to the 2010s. However, it underestimated the\nsteepness of the observed loss decline from the stormy end of the 20th\ncentury to the lull over the past 20 years. This was caused by a quite flat\ntrend in ERA5 extreme winds over the period, in contrast to the significant\ndecline in observed peak gusts. Imposing these gust trends on ERA5 peak\nwinds reconciled modelled losses with industry experience over the past few\ndecades. Indices of European winter climate used in long-range forecasting were\ncompared to the new modelled loss dataset. They had correlations of around\n0.4 at interannual timescales, rising to about 0.7 for decadal and longer\nvariations. Notably, the climate indices have a similar multidecadal trend\nas ERA5 extreme winds in modern times, including a less steep decline than\nfound in observed gusts and losses. Further investigation of the modern-day\ndivergence between climate indices and losses may help connect decadal\nforecasting to insurance.\n","PeriodicalId":18922,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A long record of European windstorm losses and its comparison to standard climate indices\",\"authors\":\"S. Cusack\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/nhess-23-2841-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Traditional insurance has both a great exposure to decadal variations in\\nEuropean storm activity and the ability to adjust its business strategy\\nover these timescales. Hence, the recent development of skilful predictions\\nof multiannual mean European winter climate seems a very welcome addition to\\nthe long list of ways that researchers have improved management of windstorm\\nrisk. Yet companies do not use these forecasts of mean winter climate to\\nadjust their view of risk. The main reason is the lack of a long, reliable\\nrecord of losses to understand how forecasted time-mean circulation\\nanomalies relate to the damage from a few, intense storms. This study fills\\nthat gap with a European windstorm loss record from 1950 to 2022, based on\\nERA5 peak near-surface winds per event which were converted to losses using\\nan established damage function. The resulting dataset successfully\\nidentifies major storms over the past 70 years and simulates the\\nmultidecadal variations from low values in the 1960s up to high levels in\\nthe 1980s and 1990s then down to the 2010s. However, it underestimated the\\nsteepness of the observed loss decline from the stormy end of the 20th\\ncentury to the lull over the past 20 years. This was caused by a quite flat\\ntrend in ERA5 extreme winds over the period, in contrast to the significant\\ndecline in observed peak gusts. Imposing these gust trends on ERA5 peak\\nwinds reconciled modelled losses with industry experience over the past few\\ndecades. Indices of European winter climate used in long-range forecasting were\\ncompared to the new modelled loss dataset. They had correlations of around\\n0.4 at interannual timescales, rising to about 0.7 for decadal and longer\\nvariations. Notably, the climate indices have a similar multidecadal trend\\nas ERA5 extreme winds in modern times, including a less steep decline than\\nfound in observed gusts and losses. Further investigation of the modern-day\\ndivergence between climate indices and losses may help connect decadal\\nforecasting to insurance.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":18922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2841-2023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2841-2023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A long record of European windstorm losses and its comparison to standard climate indices
Abstract. Traditional insurance has both a great exposure to decadal variations in
European storm activity and the ability to adjust its business strategy
over these timescales. Hence, the recent development of skilful predictions
of multiannual mean European winter climate seems a very welcome addition to
the long list of ways that researchers have improved management of windstorm
risk. Yet companies do not use these forecasts of mean winter climate to
adjust their view of risk. The main reason is the lack of a long, reliable
record of losses to understand how forecasted time-mean circulation
anomalies relate to the damage from a few, intense storms. This study fills
that gap with a European windstorm loss record from 1950 to 2022, based on
ERA5 peak near-surface winds per event which were converted to losses using
an established damage function. The resulting dataset successfully
identifies major storms over the past 70 years and simulates the
multidecadal variations from low values in the 1960s up to high levels in
the 1980s and 1990s then down to the 2010s. However, it underestimated the
steepness of the observed loss decline from the stormy end of the 20th
century to the lull over the past 20 years. This was caused by a quite flat
trend in ERA5 extreme winds over the period, in contrast to the significant
decline in observed peak gusts. Imposing these gust trends on ERA5 peak
winds reconciled modelled losses with industry experience over the past few
decades. Indices of European winter climate used in long-range forecasting were
compared to the new modelled loss dataset. They had correlations of around
0.4 at interannual timescales, rising to about 0.7 for decadal and longer
variations. Notably, the climate indices have a similar multidecadal trend
as ERA5 extreme winds in modern times, including a less steep decline than
found in observed gusts and losses. Further investigation of the modern-day
divergence between climate indices and losses may help connect decadal
forecasting to insurance.
期刊介绍:
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS) is an interdisciplinary and international journal dedicated to the public discussion and open-access publication of high-quality studies and original research on natural hazards and their consequences. Embracing a holistic Earth system science approach, NHESS serves a wide and diverse community of research scientists, practitioners, and decision makers concerned with detection of natural hazards, monitoring and modelling, vulnerability and risk assessment, and the design and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies, including economical, societal, and educational aspects.