阿尔都塞与马克思主义理论(1975):文献

IF 1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Thesis Eleven Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/07255136231182239
Peter Beilharz, S. Macintyre, K. Tribe
{"title":"阿尔都塞与马克思主义理论(1975):文献","authors":"Peter Beilharz, S. Macintyre, K. Tribe","doi":"10.1177/07255136231182239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 1975 – five years before the arrival of Thesis Eleven. Ten years after the first, French appearance of Reading Capital. Three years after the appearance of the Australian revolutionary Marxist journal Intervention. Althusser was a big deal for the English-speaking left. We all read Althusser, at least in our innocence. Althusser was an effective absence from the history of Thesis Eleven. Our people were drinking elsewhere. Maybe the timing was fortunate. Alastair Davidson, our mentor, had essayed Althusser in detail in the pages of Arena in 1969, and became his friend later in life. But he also taught us that structuralism was a language to be learned, more than a practice to be preferred. It might change the way intellectuals think, but you were not obliged to join the tribe. Theories were like languages. What was the fuss about? Some of the issues arising can be detected in perusing the text that follows. It represents Macintyre and Tribe’s intervention in the culture of the university and the party. What was the fuss about Althusser? In retrospect, it is difficult to tell, though it now seems clear that the Althusserian adventure helped provide the younger hotheads with a new vocabulary for revolution. Althusser carried a formidable theoretical apparatus. Social formation, mode of production, overdetermination, symptomatic reading, problematique and so on. Take that!","PeriodicalId":54188,"journal":{"name":"Thesis Eleven","volume":"176 1","pages":"81 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Althusser and Marxist Theory (1975): A document\",\"authors\":\"Peter Beilharz, S. Macintyre, K. Tribe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07255136231182239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year 1975 – five years before the arrival of Thesis Eleven. Ten years after the first, French appearance of Reading Capital. Three years after the appearance of the Australian revolutionary Marxist journal Intervention. Althusser was a big deal for the English-speaking left. We all read Althusser, at least in our innocence. Althusser was an effective absence from the history of Thesis Eleven. Our people were drinking elsewhere. Maybe the timing was fortunate. Alastair Davidson, our mentor, had essayed Althusser in detail in the pages of Arena in 1969, and became his friend later in life. But he also taught us that structuralism was a language to be learned, more than a practice to be preferred. It might change the way intellectuals think, but you were not obliged to join the tribe. Theories were like languages. What was the fuss about? Some of the issues arising can be detected in perusing the text that follows. It represents Macintyre and Tribe’s intervention in the culture of the university and the party. What was the fuss about Althusser? In retrospect, it is difficult to tell, though it now seems clear that the Althusserian adventure helped provide the younger hotheads with a new vocabulary for revolution. Althusser carried a formidable theoretical apparatus. Social formation, mode of production, overdetermination, symptomatic reading, problematique and so on. Take that!\",\"PeriodicalId\":54188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thesis Eleven\",\"volume\":\"176 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thesis Eleven\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231182239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thesis Eleven","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231182239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1975年——第十一篇论文问世前五年。雷丁资本首次在法国亮相十年后。澳大利亚革命马克思主义杂志《干预》出版三年后。阿尔都塞对讲英语的左派来说是件大事。我们都读过阿尔都塞,至少在我们天真无邪的时候是这样。阿尔都塞实际上是论文十一的历史缺席者。我们的人在别处喝酒。也许时机是幸运的。1969年,我们的导师阿拉斯泰尔·戴维森(Alastair Davidson)在《竞技场》(Arena)的页面上详细介绍了阿尔都塞,后来成为了他的朋友。但他也告诉我们,结构主义是一种需要学习的语言,而不是一种更可取的实践。这可能会改变知识分子的思维方式,但你没有义务加入部落。理论就像语言。有什么大惊小怪的?在阅读下面的文本时可以发现一些问题。它代表了麦金太尔和部落对大学和政党文化的干预。阿尔都塞有什么大惊小怪的?回想起来,这很难说,尽管现在看来很清楚,阿尔都塞人的冒险为年轻的头脑发热者提供了一个新的革命词汇。阿尔都塞拥有强大的理论工具。社会形态、生产方式、过度确定、症状性阅读、问题性等等。就这样吧!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Althusser and Marxist Theory (1975): A document
The year 1975 – five years before the arrival of Thesis Eleven. Ten years after the first, French appearance of Reading Capital. Three years after the appearance of the Australian revolutionary Marxist journal Intervention. Althusser was a big deal for the English-speaking left. We all read Althusser, at least in our innocence. Althusser was an effective absence from the history of Thesis Eleven. Our people were drinking elsewhere. Maybe the timing was fortunate. Alastair Davidson, our mentor, had essayed Althusser in detail in the pages of Arena in 1969, and became his friend later in life. But he also taught us that structuralism was a language to be learned, more than a practice to be preferred. It might change the way intellectuals think, but you were not obliged to join the tribe. Theories were like languages. What was the fuss about? Some of the issues arising can be detected in perusing the text that follows. It represents Macintyre and Tribe’s intervention in the culture of the university and the party. What was the fuss about Althusser? In retrospect, it is difficult to tell, though it now seems clear that the Althusserian adventure helped provide the younger hotheads with a new vocabulary for revolution. Althusser carried a formidable theoretical apparatus. Social formation, mode of production, overdetermination, symptomatic reading, problematique and so on. Take that!
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thesis Eleven
Thesis Eleven SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Established in 1996 Thesis Eleven is a truly international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal. Innovative and authorative the journal encourages the development of social theory in the broadest sense by consistently producing articles, reviews and debate with a central focus on theories of society, culture, and politics and the understanding of modernity. The purpose of this journal is to encourage the development of social theory in the broadest sense. We view social theory as both multidisciplinary and plural, reaching across social sciences and liberal arts and cultivating a diversity of critical theories of modernity across both the German and French senses of critical theory.
期刊最新文献
Jeffrey Alexander, a statesman in social theory and cultural sociology: An interview with Frédéric Vandenberghe From systems to forms: Reconstructing Niklas Luhmann’s approach to relationships Cornelius Castoriadis and Jacques Ellul on the dilemmas of technical autonomy ‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist Book review: The Work of History: Writing for Stuart Macintyre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1