{"title":"阿尔都塞与马克思主义理论(1975):文献","authors":"Peter Beilharz, S. Macintyre, K. Tribe","doi":"10.1177/07255136231182239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 1975 – five years before the arrival of Thesis Eleven. Ten years after the first, French appearance of Reading Capital. Three years after the appearance of the Australian revolutionary Marxist journal Intervention. Althusser was a big deal for the English-speaking left. We all read Althusser, at least in our innocence. Althusser was an effective absence from the history of Thesis Eleven. Our people were drinking elsewhere. Maybe the timing was fortunate. Alastair Davidson, our mentor, had essayed Althusser in detail in the pages of Arena in 1969, and became his friend later in life. But he also taught us that structuralism was a language to be learned, more than a practice to be preferred. It might change the way intellectuals think, but you were not obliged to join the tribe. Theories were like languages. What was the fuss about? Some of the issues arising can be detected in perusing the text that follows. It represents Macintyre and Tribe’s intervention in the culture of the university and the party. What was the fuss about Althusser? In retrospect, it is difficult to tell, though it now seems clear that the Althusserian adventure helped provide the younger hotheads with a new vocabulary for revolution. Althusser carried a formidable theoretical apparatus. Social formation, mode of production, overdetermination, symptomatic reading, problematique and so on. Take that!","PeriodicalId":54188,"journal":{"name":"Thesis Eleven","volume":"176 1","pages":"81 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Althusser and Marxist Theory (1975): A document\",\"authors\":\"Peter Beilharz, S. Macintyre, K. Tribe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07255136231182239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year 1975 – five years before the arrival of Thesis Eleven. Ten years after the first, French appearance of Reading Capital. Three years after the appearance of the Australian revolutionary Marxist journal Intervention. Althusser was a big deal for the English-speaking left. We all read Althusser, at least in our innocence. Althusser was an effective absence from the history of Thesis Eleven. Our people were drinking elsewhere. Maybe the timing was fortunate. Alastair Davidson, our mentor, had essayed Althusser in detail in the pages of Arena in 1969, and became his friend later in life. But he also taught us that structuralism was a language to be learned, more than a practice to be preferred. It might change the way intellectuals think, but you were not obliged to join the tribe. Theories were like languages. What was the fuss about? Some of the issues arising can be detected in perusing the text that follows. It represents Macintyre and Tribe’s intervention in the culture of the university and the party. What was the fuss about Althusser? In retrospect, it is difficult to tell, though it now seems clear that the Althusserian adventure helped provide the younger hotheads with a new vocabulary for revolution. Althusser carried a formidable theoretical apparatus. Social formation, mode of production, overdetermination, symptomatic reading, problematique and so on. Take that!\",\"PeriodicalId\":54188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thesis Eleven\",\"volume\":\"176 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thesis Eleven\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231182239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thesis Eleven","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231182239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The year 1975 – five years before the arrival of Thesis Eleven. Ten years after the first, French appearance of Reading Capital. Three years after the appearance of the Australian revolutionary Marxist journal Intervention. Althusser was a big deal for the English-speaking left. We all read Althusser, at least in our innocence. Althusser was an effective absence from the history of Thesis Eleven. Our people were drinking elsewhere. Maybe the timing was fortunate. Alastair Davidson, our mentor, had essayed Althusser in detail in the pages of Arena in 1969, and became his friend later in life. But he also taught us that structuralism was a language to be learned, more than a practice to be preferred. It might change the way intellectuals think, but you were not obliged to join the tribe. Theories were like languages. What was the fuss about? Some of the issues arising can be detected in perusing the text that follows. It represents Macintyre and Tribe’s intervention in the culture of the university and the party. What was the fuss about Althusser? In retrospect, it is difficult to tell, though it now seems clear that the Althusserian adventure helped provide the younger hotheads with a new vocabulary for revolution. Althusser carried a formidable theoretical apparatus. Social formation, mode of production, overdetermination, symptomatic reading, problematique and so on. Take that!
期刊介绍:
Established in 1996 Thesis Eleven is a truly international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal. Innovative and authorative the journal encourages the development of social theory in the broadest sense by consistently producing articles, reviews and debate with a central focus on theories of society, culture, and politics and the understanding of modernity. The purpose of this journal is to encourage the development of social theory in the broadest sense. We view social theory as both multidisciplinary and plural, reaching across social sciences and liberal arts and cultivating a diversity of critical theories of modernity across both the German and French senses of critical theory.