开发增强型业务流程改进方法(EBPIM)

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1108/ijlss-07-2022-0154
Alaa M. Ubaid, F. Dweiri
{"title":"开发增强型业务流程改进方法(EBPIM)","authors":"Alaa M. Ubaid, F. Dweiri","doi":"10.1108/ijlss-07-2022-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis research paper aims to develop and validate an enhanced business process improvement methodology (EBPIM) by integrating the DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve and control) and the comprehensive business process management (CBPM) methodologies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic literature review and analysis were conducted to prove the novelty of the research approach and identify the similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses of the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies. The EBPIM was proposed based on the analysis results. Then, a focus group approach was used to evaluate and validate the methodology.\n\n\nFindings\nThe EBPIM consists of nine activities: preparation, selection, description, quantification, modeling, enactment, improvement opportunities selection, analysis and improvement and monitoring. The proposed methodology adopted the systematic and structured process of the DMAIC methodology by having one tollgate between every two activities to check the progress and authorize the team to go to the next activity. At the same time, it has the ability of the CBPM methodology to enhance the interaction between human activities and business process management systems (BPMS).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe EBPIM was evaluated and validated by a focus group of academic professors. However, the main limitation of the proposed methodology is that it is still theoretical and needs to be empirically tested. Therefore, future work will focus on testing the EBPIM in different industries and organization sizes.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFrom the theoretical perspective, the proposed methodology adds value to the knowledge in the scope of business processes improvement methodologies (BPIMs) by integrating the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies. It takes advantage of and combines the strengths of the DMAIC and CBPM methodologies. From the practical perspective, the proposed methodology presents a valuable tool that can facilitate the organization’s mission to improve the areas that need improvement using a systematic improvement methodology that will effectively enhance organizational performance (OP).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe BPIMs literature analysis proved that most of the reviewed methodologies could not support all phases of the business process improvement (BPI) activities. It was concluded that integrating the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies is a novel approach. The proposed methodology will enhance the efficiency of both methodologies, fill the gaps that may exist in both of them and lead to better results in terms of BPI.\n","PeriodicalId":48601,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an enhanced business process improvement methodology (EBPIM)\",\"authors\":\"Alaa M. Ubaid, F. Dweiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlss-07-2022-0154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis research paper aims to develop and validate an enhanced business process improvement methodology (EBPIM) by integrating the DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve and control) and the comprehensive business process management (CBPM) methodologies.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA systematic literature review and analysis were conducted to prove the novelty of the research approach and identify the similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses of the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies. The EBPIM was proposed based on the analysis results. Then, a focus group approach was used to evaluate and validate the methodology.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe EBPIM consists of nine activities: preparation, selection, description, quantification, modeling, enactment, improvement opportunities selection, analysis and improvement and monitoring. The proposed methodology adopted the systematic and structured process of the DMAIC methodology by having one tollgate between every two activities to check the progress and authorize the team to go to the next activity. At the same time, it has the ability of the CBPM methodology to enhance the interaction between human activities and business process management systems (BPMS).\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe EBPIM was evaluated and validated by a focus group of academic professors. However, the main limitation of the proposed methodology is that it is still theoretical and needs to be empirically tested. Therefore, future work will focus on testing the EBPIM in different industries and organization sizes.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nFrom the theoretical perspective, the proposed methodology adds value to the knowledge in the scope of business processes improvement methodologies (BPIMs) by integrating the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies. It takes advantage of and combines the strengths of the DMAIC and CBPM methodologies. From the practical perspective, the proposed methodology presents a valuable tool that can facilitate the organization’s mission to improve the areas that need improvement using a systematic improvement methodology that will effectively enhance organizational performance (OP).\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe BPIMs literature analysis proved that most of the reviewed methodologies could not support all phases of the business process improvement (BPI) activities. It was concluded that integrating the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies is a novel approach. The proposed methodology will enhance the efficiency of both methodologies, fill the gaps that may exist in both of them and lead to better results in terms of BPI.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-07-2022-0154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-07-2022-0154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在通过集成DMAIC(定义、测量、分析、改进和控制)和综合业务流程管理(CBPM)方法,开发和验证增强型业务流程改进方法论(EBPIM)。设计/方法/方法进行了系统的文献综述和分析,以证明研究方法的新颖性,并确定DMAIC和CBPM方法的相似性、差异性、优势和劣势。基于分析结果提出了EBPIM。然后,使用焦点小组方法来评估和验证该方法。发现EBPIM由九项活动组成:准备、选择、描述、量化、建模、制定、改进机会选择、分析、改进和监控。所提出的方法采用了DMAIC方法的系统和结构化流程,每两项活动之间有一个收费站,以检查进度并授权团队进行下一项活动。同时,它具有CBPM方法论的能力,可以增强人类活动与业务流程管理系统(BPMS)之间的互动。研究局限性/含义EBPIM由学术教授组成的焦点小组进行了评估和验证。然而,所提出的方法的主要局限性在于,它仍然是理论性的,需要进行实证检验。因此,未来的工作将侧重于在不同行业和组织规模中测试EBPIM。实际含义从理论角度来看,所提出的方法通过集成DMAIC和CBPM方法,为业务流程改进方法(BPIM)范围内的知识增加了价值。它利用并结合了DMAIC和CBPM方法的优势。从实用的角度来看,所提出的方法提供了一个有价值的工具,可以促进组织的使命,即使用系统的改进方法来改进需要改进的领域,从而有效地提高组织绩效。独创性/价值BPIM的文献分析证明,大多数审查的方法不能支持业务流程的所有阶段改进(BPI)活动。得出的结论是,将DMAIC和CBPM方法相结合是一种新颖的方法。拟议的方法将提高这两种方法的效率,填补两者可能存在的空白,并在BPI方面取得更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing an enhanced business process improvement methodology (EBPIM)
Purpose This research paper aims to develop and validate an enhanced business process improvement methodology (EBPIM) by integrating the DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve and control) and the comprehensive business process management (CBPM) methodologies. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review and analysis were conducted to prove the novelty of the research approach and identify the similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses of the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies. The EBPIM was proposed based on the analysis results. Then, a focus group approach was used to evaluate and validate the methodology. Findings The EBPIM consists of nine activities: preparation, selection, description, quantification, modeling, enactment, improvement opportunities selection, analysis and improvement and monitoring. The proposed methodology adopted the systematic and structured process of the DMAIC methodology by having one tollgate between every two activities to check the progress and authorize the team to go to the next activity. At the same time, it has the ability of the CBPM methodology to enhance the interaction between human activities and business process management systems (BPMS). Research limitations/implications The EBPIM was evaluated and validated by a focus group of academic professors. However, the main limitation of the proposed methodology is that it is still theoretical and needs to be empirically tested. Therefore, future work will focus on testing the EBPIM in different industries and organization sizes. Practical implications From the theoretical perspective, the proposed methodology adds value to the knowledge in the scope of business processes improvement methodologies (BPIMs) by integrating the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies. It takes advantage of and combines the strengths of the DMAIC and CBPM methodologies. From the practical perspective, the proposed methodology presents a valuable tool that can facilitate the organization’s mission to improve the areas that need improvement using a systematic improvement methodology that will effectively enhance organizational performance (OP). Originality/value The BPIMs literature analysis proved that most of the reviewed methodologies could not support all phases of the business process improvement (BPI) activities. It was concluded that integrating the DMAIC and the CBPM methodologies is a novel approach. The proposed methodology will enhance the efficiency of both methodologies, fill the gaps that may exist in both of them and lead to better results in terms of BPI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Launched in 2010, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma publishes original, empirical and review papers, case studies and theoretical frameworks or models related to Lean and Six Sigma methodologies. High quality submissions are sought from academics, researchers, practitioners and leading management consultants from around the world. Research, case studies and examples can be cited from manufacturing, service and public sectors. This includes manufacturing, health, financial services, local government, education, professional services, IT Services, transport, etc.
期刊最新文献
Overall lean and green effectiveness based on the environmentally sustainable value stream mapping adapted to agribusiness Quality improvement of magnetron in Company T based on Six Sigma Adapting and validating the EPLIT for assessing lean healthcare maturity in Brazilian hospitals Quality improvement development in Swedish healthcare and welfare services Adopting Industry 4.0 technologies through lean tools: evidence from the European Manufacturing Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1