识别儿童权益中心的成功和障碍:对五个服务领域的考察

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Child & Youth Services Pub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI:10.1080/0145935X.2022.2107505
Amber E. Krushas, T. C. Kulig, E. Wright, Ryan Spohn, Lynn M. Castrianno
{"title":"识别儿童权益中心的成功和障碍:对五个服务领域的考察","authors":"Amber E. Krushas, T. C. Kulig, E. Wright, Ryan Spohn, Lynn M. Castrianno","doi":"10.1080/0145935X.2022.2107505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite widespread support for coordinated responses to child maltreatment, little research examines the successes and barriers faced by child advocacy centers (CACs). The current study examines perspectives on program operations within a large CAC in the Midwest across 14 focus groups, including both internal CAC staff (N = 32) and external agency partners (N = 37). Universal successes and barriers were identified across all service areas. Still, the findings indicate a need to also consider the unique factors affecting each service area. The importance of these findings is discussed for those working in arenas that provide services to youth and families exposed to trauma.","PeriodicalId":45151,"journal":{"name":"Child & Youth Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Successes and Barriers in a Child Advocacy Center: An Examination of Five Service Areas\",\"authors\":\"Amber E. Krushas, T. C. Kulig, E. Wright, Ryan Spohn, Lynn M. Castrianno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0145935X.2022.2107505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Despite widespread support for coordinated responses to child maltreatment, little research examines the successes and barriers faced by child advocacy centers (CACs). The current study examines perspectives on program operations within a large CAC in the Midwest across 14 focus groups, including both internal CAC staff (N = 32) and external agency partners (N = 37). Universal successes and barriers were identified across all service areas. Still, the findings indicate a need to also consider the unique factors affecting each service area. The importance of these findings is discussed for those working in arenas that provide services to youth and families exposed to trauma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Youth Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Youth Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2022.2107505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Youth Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2022.2107505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要尽管人们普遍支持对虐待儿童的协调应对,但很少有研究考察儿童倡导中心(CAC)的成功和面临的障碍。目前的研究考察了中西部一家大型CAC 14个重点小组对项目运营的看法,其中包括CAC内部员工(N = 32)和外部机构合作伙伴(N = 37)。在所有服务领域都发现了普遍的成功和障碍。尽管如此,研究结果表明,还需要考虑影响每个服务领域的独特因素。讨论了这些发现对那些在为遭受创伤的青年和家庭提供服务的领域工作的人的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Successes and Barriers in a Child Advocacy Center: An Examination of Five Service Areas
Abstract Despite widespread support for coordinated responses to child maltreatment, little research examines the successes and barriers faced by child advocacy centers (CACs). The current study examines perspectives on program operations within a large CAC in the Midwest across 14 focus groups, including both internal CAC staff (N = 32) and external agency partners (N = 37). Universal successes and barriers were identified across all service areas. Still, the findings indicate a need to also consider the unique factors affecting each service area. The importance of these findings is discussed for those working in arenas that provide services to youth and families exposed to trauma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child & Youth Services
Child & Youth Services SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Functional Diversity and Access to the World of Work in Young People: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Safety Nets: A Social Prescribing Intervention to Support Young People on CAMHS Waiting Lists Stress-Coping Patterns of Japanese School-Aged Children with Allergic Diseases: A Qualitative Study Have I Seen You Here Before? Social Network and Physical Activity Implications of Previous Participation in a Summer Care Program Longitudinal Trajectories of Identity Formation and Resilience Development in Adolescents Living in Under-Resourced Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1