滴管式药物筛查作为法医病理学分型方式的可靠性评价

Q4 Medicine Academic Forensic Pathology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1177/19253621231190415
Lorenzo Gitto, Mojde Mir, Ponni Arunkumar
{"title":"滴管式药物筛查作为法医病理学分型方式的可靠性评价","authors":"Lorenzo Gitto, Mojde Mir, Ponni Arunkumar","doi":"10.1177/19253621231190415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dipstick drug screens are cheap, easy to use, and quick presumptive tests to detect common drugs of abuse. Dipsticks are designed for drug detection in urine. There is no literature regarding their potential use on fluids different from urine. The study aimed to determine the performance of dipstick screening tests on postmortem vitreous and blood specimens compared to urine dipsticks and final confirmatory toxicology analyses on blood. The study population included cases in which a complete toxicology analysis was performed. Each subject was screened for three substances: cocaine, fentanyl, and opiates. Dipstick results were checked by visual inspection. Results were compared with urine screening tests and quantitative, confirmatory toxicological analyses by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry on postmortem blood samples as the gold standards for screening and confirmatory analysis, respectively. There was a high number of false-negative results for opiates. Cocaine dipsticks in blood showed the highest reliability. Fentanyl dipsticks in vitreous showed a high number of false-negative results. Both vitreous and blood dipstick screening tests for all substances performed well on negative cases. When both blood and vitreous screening tests are negative, the chance that the confirmatory toxicology analysis will be positive is very low.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":"1 1","pages":"92-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10825466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Reliability of Dipstick Drug Screens on Vitreous and Postmortem Blood as a Triage Modality in Forensic Pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Gitto, Mojde Mir, Ponni Arunkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19253621231190415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dipstick drug screens are cheap, easy to use, and quick presumptive tests to detect common drugs of abuse. Dipsticks are designed for drug detection in urine. There is no literature regarding their potential use on fluids different from urine. The study aimed to determine the performance of dipstick screening tests on postmortem vitreous and blood specimens compared to urine dipsticks and final confirmatory toxicology analyses on blood. The study population included cases in which a complete toxicology analysis was performed. Each subject was screened for three substances: cocaine, fentanyl, and opiates. Dipstick results were checked by visual inspection. Results were compared with urine screening tests and quantitative, confirmatory toxicological analyses by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry on postmortem blood samples as the gold standards for screening and confirmatory analysis, respectively. There was a high number of false-negative results for opiates. Cocaine dipsticks in blood showed the highest reliability. Fentanyl dipsticks in vitreous showed a high number of false-negative results. Both vitreous and blood dipstick screening tests for all substances performed well on negative cases. When both blood and vitreous screening tests are negative, the chance that the confirmatory toxicology analysis will be positive is very low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"92-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10825466/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621231190415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621231190415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

试纸药物筛查是一种廉价、易于使用和快速的推定测试,可检测出常见的滥用药物。试纸是为尿液中的药物检测而设计的。目前还没有关于它们在尿液以外的液体中的潜在用途的文献。该研究旨在确定死后玻璃体和血液样本的试纸筛选试验与尿液试纸的性能,并最终确定血液的毒理学分析。研究人群包括进行了完整毒理学分析的病例。每位受试者都接受了三种物质的筛查:可卡因、芬太尼和阿片类药物。油尺结果通过目视检查进行检查。将结果与尿液筛选试验和尸检血液样本气相色谱/质谱定量、确证性毒理学分析进行比较,分别作为筛选和确证性分析的金标准。阿片类药物的假阴性结果很多。血液中的可卡因试纸显示出最高的可靠性。芬太尼试纸玻璃体假阴性率高。玻璃体和血液试纸对所有物质的筛查试验在阴性病例中表现良好。当血液和玻璃体筛查试验均为阴性时,确认毒理学分析呈阳性的机会非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Reliability of Dipstick Drug Screens on Vitreous and Postmortem Blood as a Triage Modality in Forensic Pathology.

Dipstick drug screens are cheap, easy to use, and quick presumptive tests to detect common drugs of abuse. Dipsticks are designed for drug detection in urine. There is no literature regarding their potential use on fluids different from urine. The study aimed to determine the performance of dipstick screening tests on postmortem vitreous and blood specimens compared to urine dipsticks and final confirmatory toxicology analyses on blood. The study population included cases in which a complete toxicology analysis was performed. Each subject was screened for three substances: cocaine, fentanyl, and opiates. Dipstick results were checked by visual inspection. Results were compared with urine screening tests and quantitative, confirmatory toxicological analyses by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry on postmortem blood samples as the gold standards for screening and confirmatory analysis, respectively. There was a high number of false-negative results for opiates. Cocaine dipsticks in blood showed the highest reliability. Fentanyl dipsticks in vitreous showed a high number of false-negative results. Both vitreous and blood dipstick screening tests for all substances performed well on negative cases. When both blood and vitreous screening tests are negative, the chance that the confirmatory toxicology analysis will be positive is very low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Concealed Homicide in a Sexually Abused Child. The Sudden Death of Cardinal Decio Azzolino Junior (1623-1689), the Universal Heir of Queen Christina of Sweden: A Dropsy Case? Deaths Related to New-Onset Seizures After Vaccination. Left Thumb to Left Big Toe: An Uncommon Case of Electrocution Suicide. Forensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 1: Common Questions and Considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1