评估基于绩效的融资(PBF)对津巴布韦护理质量的影响以及影响PBF在提高护理质量方面有效性的背景因素的探索性研究

R. Mutasa, Sarah Baird, F. Takavarasha, A. Markus, J. Friedman, W. Zeng
{"title":"评估基于绩效的融资(PBF)对津巴布韦护理质量的影响以及影响PBF在提高护理质量方面有效性的背景因素的探索性研究","authors":"R. Mutasa, Sarah Baird, F. Takavarasha, A. Markus, J. Friedman, W. Zeng","doi":"10.21037/JHMHP-20-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ensuring value for health sector spending is a universal concern for policy makers in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health care demands are rising and health sector financing is limited. Performance-based financing (PBF) is more frequently being implemented in LMICs to improve quality of care and ultimately health system outcomes. Through PBF, LMICs can potentially reduce variation in clinical practice, because PBF provider incentives are directly linked to achievement of predefined quality of care standards and adherence to quality protocols. Zimbabwe implemented PBF in 16 districts as a health system reform to improve the quality and coverage of health services from 2011. This paper first estimates the impact of PBF on quality of care, and then explores contextual factors mediating the effectiveness of PBF in improving quality of care LMICs were at various stages of piloting and scaling up performance-based incentive schemes (4). The underlying rationale is that performance-based financing (PBF) can extrinsically motivate health providers through incentives. By financially rewarding improvements in quality of health care, health providers will make greater efforts to achieve better results (3). As such, PBF is a core component of strategic purchasing of health services in a growing number of LMICs. Strategic purchasing helps link resources for health to the effective delivery of quality services (6). can or and that determine made to care by 27.7% (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Evaluations of complex health system reform interventions such as PBF need to go beyond exploring effects on priority health outcomes. As a strategic purchasing tool, PBF design should be informed by a country’s contextual factors. At the same time, evidence on contextual factors outside the control of policy makers and the health system—such as mean population wealth—must be better understood and documented.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory study estimating the impact of performance-based financing (PBF) on quality of care and on the contextual factors mediating the effectiveness of PBF in improving quality of care in Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"R. Mutasa, Sarah Baird, F. Takavarasha, A. Markus, J. Friedman, W. Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/JHMHP-20-60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ensuring value for health sector spending is a universal concern for policy makers in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health care demands are rising and health sector financing is limited. Performance-based financing (PBF) is more frequently being implemented in LMICs to improve quality of care and ultimately health system outcomes. Through PBF, LMICs can potentially reduce variation in clinical practice, because PBF provider incentives are directly linked to achievement of predefined quality of care standards and adherence to quality protocols. Zimbabwe implemented PBF in 16 districts as a health system reform to improve the quality and coverage of health services from 2011. This paper first estimates the impact of PBF on quality of care, and then explores contextual factors mediating the effectiveness of PBF in improving quality of care LMICs were at various stages of piloting and scaling up performance-based incentive schemes (4). The underlying rationale is that performance-based financing (PBF) can extrinsically motivate health providers through incentives. By financially rewarding improvements in quality of health care, health providers will make greater efforts to achieve better results (3). As such, PBF is a core component of strategic purchasing of health services in a growing number of LMICs. Strategic purchasing helps link resources for health to the effective delivery of quality services (6). can or and that determine made to care by 27.7% (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Evaluations of complex health system reform interventions such as PBF need to go beyond exploring effects on priority health outcomes. As a strategic purchasing tool, PBF design should be informed by a country’s contextual factors. At the same time, evidence on contextual factors outside the control of policy makers and the health system—such as mean population wealth—must be better understood and documented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/JHMHP-20-60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JHMHP-20-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:确保卫生部门支出的价值是中低收入国家政策制定者普遍关心的问题,这些国家的卫生保健需求正在上升,卫生部门的资金有限。基于绩效的融资(PBF)越来越频繁地在LMIC中实施,以提高护理质量并最终改善卫生系统的结果。通过PBF,LMIC可以潜在地减少临床实践中的差异,因为PBF提供者的激励措施与实现预定义的护理质量标准和遵守质量协议直接相关。津巴布韦从2011年起在16个地区实施了PBF,作为一项卫生系统改革,以提高卫生服务的质量和覆盖率。本文首先估计了PBF对护理质量的影响,然后探讨了介导PBF在提高护理质量方面有效性的背景因素。LMIC处于试点和扩大基于绩效的激励计划的各个阶段(4)。其基本原理是,基于绩效的融资(PBF)可以通过激励从外部激励医疗服务提供者。通过在经济上奖励医疗保健质量的提高,医疗保健提供者将做出更大的努力来取得更好的结果(3)。因此,在越来越多的LMIC中,PBF是战略购买医疗服务的核心组成部分。战略采购有助于将卫生资源与有效提供优质服务联系起来(6)。结论:对复杂的卫生系统改革干预措施(如PBF)的评估需要超越探索对优先健康结果的影响。作为一种战略采购工具,PBF的设计应考虑一个国家的背景因素。与此同时,必须更好地理解和记录政策制定者和卫生系统无法控制的背景因素的证据,例如平均人口财富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploratory study estimating the impact of performance-based financing (PBF) on quality of care and on the contextual factors mediating the effectiveness of PBF in improving quality of care in Zimbabwe
Background: Ensuring value for health sector spending is a universal concern for policy makers in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health care demands are rising and health sector financing is limited. Performance-based financing (PBF) is more frequently being implemented in LMICs to improve quality of care and ultimately health system outcomes. Through PBF, LMICs can potentially reduce variation in clinical practice, because PBF provider incentives are directly linked to achievement of predefined quality of care standards and adherence to quality protocols. Zimbabwe implemented PBF in 16 districts as a health system reform to improve the quality and coverage of health services from 2011. This paper first estimates the impact of PBF on quality of care, and then explores contextual factors mediating the effectiveness of PBF in improving quality of care LMICs were at various stages of piloting and scaling up performance-based incentive schemes (4). The underlying rationale is that performance-based financing (PBF) can extrinsically motivate health providers through incentives. By financially rewarding improvements in quality of health care, health providers will make greater efforts to achieve better results (3). As such, PBF is a core component of strategic purchasing of health services in a growing number of LMICs. Strategic purchasing helps link resources for health to the effective delivery of quality services (6). can or and that determine made to care by 27.7% (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Evaluations of complex health system reform interventions such as PBF need to go beyond exploring effects on priority health outcomes. As a strategic purchasing tool, PBF design should be informed by a country’s contextual factors. At the same time, evidence on contextual factors outside the control of policy makers and the health system—such as mean population wealth—must be better understood and documented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1