1级和2级创伤中心儿童重大创伤经验对严重儿童创伤性脑损伤的总结

Anna R. Kimata, O. Tang, Wael Asaad
{"title":"1级和2级创伤中心儿童重大创伤经验对严重儿童创伤性脑损伤的总结","authors":"Anna R. Kimata, O. Tang, Wael Asaad","doi":"10.21037/JECCM-21-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To examine the volume-outcome relationship in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) using a retrospective analysis and to determine whether volume as a measure of broader trauma experience may generalize to favor improved pediatric TBI outcomes. Methods: We isolated all pediatric admissions for severe TBI (GCS admission score 3–8) to Pediatric ACS Level I and II Trauma Centers in the 2012–2015 National Trauma Data Bank. Using multivariate regression analysis, we examined the impact of four distinct volume variables—pediatric severe TBI, pediatric major trauma, adult severe TBI, and adult major trauma—on severe pediatric TBI short-term outcomes. Each volume measure was analyzed continuously as a primary independent variable. Our primary outcome variable was hospital discharge disposition. We adjusted for patient demographics, hospital characteristics, trauma severity metrics, and field-to-hospital time. Results: A total of 5,425 severe pediatric TBI patients were included in the final study population. Following multivariate analysis, only higher pediatric major trauma volume was associated with higher odds of favorable discharge [OR =1.073, 95% CI: (1.033, 1.114) per +100 patients, P<0.001]. Major pediatric trauma volume was also associated with shorter hospital ( ‒ 0.21 days per +100 patients, P=0.035) and ICU LOS ( ‒ 0.16 days per +100 patients, P=0.011). Both pediatric trauma and TBI volume were correlated with lower complication rates [Major Pediatric Trauma: OR =0.956, (0.921, 0.992) per +100 patients, P=0.018; Severe Pediatric TBI: OR =0.824, (0.728, 0.933) per +100 patients, P=0.002], particularly ARDS [Major Pediatric Trauma: OR =0.851, (0.783, 0.924) per +100 patients, P<0.001, Severe Pediatric TBI: OR =0.505, (0.372, 0.684) per +100 patients, P<0.001]. Conclusions: Among four different volume metrics, pediatric major trauma volume was correlated with more favorable discharge. General pediatric trauma experience was also associated with lower complication rates, particularly ARDS. An institution’s adult trauma and TBI experience did not significantly influence severe pediatric TBI outcomes. 17","PeriodicalId":73727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalizability of pediatric major trauma experience to severe pediatric traumatic brain injury at level 1 and 2 trauma centers\",\"authors\":\"Anna R. Kimata, O. Tang, Wael Asaad\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/JECCM-21-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To examine the volume-outcome relationship in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) using a retrospective analysis and to determine whether volume as a measure of broader trauma experience may generalize to favor improved pediatric TBI outcomes. Methods: We isolated all pediatric admissions for severe TBI (GCS admission score 3–8) to Pediatric ACS Level I and II Trauma Centers in the 2012–2015 National Trauma Data Bank. Using multivariate regression analysis, we examined the impact of four distinct volume variables—pediatric severe TBI, pediatric major trauma, adult severe TBI, and adult major trauma—on severe pediatric TBI short-term outcomes. Each volume measure was analyzed continuously as a primary independent variable. Our primary outcome variable was hospital discharge disposition. We adjusted for patient demographics, hospital characteristics, trauma severity metrics, and field-to-hospital time. Results: A total of 5,425 severe pediatric TBI patients were included in the final study population. Following multivariate analysis, only higher pediatric major trauma volume was associated with higher odds of favorable discharge [OR =1.073, 95% CI: (1.033, 1.114) per +100 patients, P<0.001]. Major pediatric trauma volume was also associated with shorter hospital ( ‒ 0.21 days per +100 patients, P=0.035) and ICU LOS ( ‒ 0.16 days per +100 patients, P=0.011). Both pediatric trauma and TBI volume were correlated with lower complication rates [Major Pediatric Trauma: OR =0.956, (0.921, 0.992) per +100 patients, P=0.018; Severe Pediatric TBI: OR =0.824, (0.728, 0.933) per +100 patients, P=0.002], particularly ARDS [Major Pediatric Trauma: OR =0.851, (0.783, 0.924) per +100 patients, P<0.001, Severe Pediatric TBI: OR =0.505, (0.372, 0.684) per +100 patients, P<0.001]. Conclusions: Among four different volume metrics, pediatric major trauma volume was correlated with more favorable discharge. General pediatric trauma experience was also associated with lower complication rates, particularly ARDS. An institution’s adult trauma and TBI experience did not significantly influence severe pediatric TBI outcomes. 17\",\"PeriodicalId\":73727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/JECCM-21-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JECCM-21-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:使用回顾性分析来检查严重儿童创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的体积-结果关系,并确定体积作为衡量更广泛创伤经历的指标是否可以推广到有利于改善儿童创伤性脑外伤的结果。方法:我们在2012-2015年国家创伤数据库中,将所有因严重TBI(GCS入院评分3-8)而入住儿童ACS一级和二级创伤中心的儿童进行了隔离。使用多元回归分析,我们检查了四个不同的体积变量——儿童严重TBI、儿童严重创伤、成人严重TBI和成人严重创伤——对严重儿童TBI短期结果的影响。将每个体积测量值作为主要自变量进行连续分析。我们的主要结果变量是出院处置。我们根据患者人口统计、医院特征、创伤严重程度指标和现场到医院的时间进行了调整。结果:最终研究人群中共有5425名严重的儿科TBI患者。在多变量分析之后,只有更高的儿科严重创伤量与更高的有利出院几率相关[OR=1.073,95%CI:(1.033,1.114)每+100名患者,P<0.001]。严重的儿科创伤量也与更短的住院时间(-0.21天每+100例患者,P=0.035)和ICU LOS(-0.16天每+1000例患者,P=0.011)相关。儿科创伤和TBI量均与较低的并发症发生率[重大儿科创伤:OR=0.956,(0.921,0.992)每+100名患者,P=0.018;严重儿科TBI:OR=0.824,(0.728,0.933)每+1000名患者,P=0.002],特别是ARDS[重大儿科外伤:OR=0.85 1,儿童严重创伤体积与更有利的出院相关。一般的儿科创伤经历也与较低的并发症发生率相关,尤其是ARDS。机构的成人创伤和创伤性脑损伤经历对严重的儿科创伤性脑损伤结果没有显著影响。17
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generalizability of pediatric major trauma experience to severe pediatric traumatic brain injury at level 1 and 2 trauma centers
Background: To examine the volume-outcome relationship in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) using a retrospective analysis and to determine whether volume as a measure of broader trauma experience may generalize to favor improved pediatric TBI outcomes. Methods: We isolated all pediatric admissions for severe TBI (GCS admission score 3–8) to Pediatric ACS Level I and II Trauma Centers in the 2012–2015 National Trauma Data Bank. Using multivariate regression analysis, we examined the impact of four distinct volume variables—pediatric severe TBI, pediatric major trauma, adult severe TBI, and adult major trauma—on severe pediatric TBI short-term outcomes. Each volume measure was analyzed continuously as a primary independent variable. Our primary outcome variable was hospital discharge disposition. We adjusted for patient demographics, hospital characteristics, trauma severity metrics, and field-to-hospital time. Results: A total of 5,425 severe pediatric TBI patients were included in the final study population. Following multivariate analysis, only higher pediatric major trauma volume was associated with higher odds of favorable discharge [OR =1.073, 95% CI: (1.033, 1.114) per +100 patients, P<0.001]. Major pediatric trauma volume was also associated with shorter hospital ( ‒ 0.21 days per +100 patients, P=0.035) and ICU LOS ( ‒ 0.16 days per +100 patients, P=0.011). Both pediatric trauma and TBI volume were correlated with lower complication rates [Major Pediatric Trauma: OR =0.956, (0.921, 0.992) per +100 patients, P=0.018; Severe Pediatric TBI: OR =0.824, (0.728, 0.933) per +100 patients, P=0.002], particularly ARDS [Major Pediatric Trauma: OR =0.851, (0.783, 0.924) per +100 patients, P<0.001, Severe Pediatric TBI: OR =0.505, (0.372, 0.684) per +100 patients, P<0.001]. Conclusions: Among four different volume metrics, pediatric major trauma volume was correlated with more favorable discharge. General pediatric trauma experience was also associated with lower complication rates, particularly ARDS. An institution’s adult trauma and TBI experience did not significantly influence severe pediatric TBI outcomes. 17
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal management of mobile cabin hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from Shanghai, China A case series of Slow continuous ultrafiltration for COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus with palivizumab in an adult liver transplant recipient: a case report Pituitary apoplexy mimicking stroke and myocardial infarction: a case report Diagnosis, management and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1