回避型和焦虑型配偶之间的关系动荡过程

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2022-03-24 DOI:10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720
Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan, Matt Shin
{"title":"回避型和焦虑型配偶之间的关系动荡过程","authors":"Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan, Matt Shin","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Relational turbulence theory (RTT) articulates processes that explain why spouses evaluate their marriages as chaotic. Specifically, RTT predicts that relational uncertainty biases cognitive appraisals about the marriage and that partner interference with daily routines heightens negative emotions toward the spouse, both of which, culminate in relational turbulence. Our study confirmed these theoretical processes in marriage. However, by integrating attachment theory predictions into RTT to further inform these processes, we demonstrated that RTT’s mechanisms were not the same for all spouses as they were dependent upon individuals’ attachment dimensions. Results of a latent profile analysis with distal outcomes indicated that RTT’s relationship parameters differed among spouses’ attachment styles, and results of conditional process models revealed that spouses who were higher in both attachment avoidance and anxiety experienced the most relational turbulence through theorized processes. Because RTT’s relationship parameters and processes differed by spouses’ attachment, our results speak to the importance of considering the moderation of RTT’s mechanistic pathways with particular emphasis on partners who vary in relationship security and interpersonal vulnerabilities","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":"70 1","pages":"317 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational turbulence processes among avoidant and anxious spouses\",\"authors\":\"Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan, Matt Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Relational turbulence theory (RTT) articulates processes that explain why spouses evaluate their marriages as chaotic. Specifically, RTT predicts that relational uncertainty biases cognitive appraisals about the marriage and that partner interference with daily routines heightens negative emotions toward the spouse, both of which, culminate in relational turbulence. Our study confirmed these theoretical processes in marriage. However, by integrating attachment theory predictions into RTT to further inform these processes, we demonstrated that RTT’s mechanisms were not the same for all spouses as they were dependent upon individuals’ attachment dimensions. Results of a latent profile analysis with distal outcomes indicated that RTT’s relationship parameters differed among spouses’ attachment styles, and results of conditional process models revealed that spouses who were higher in both attachment avoidance and anxiety experienced the most relational turbulence through theorized processes. Because RTT’s relationship parameters and processes differed by spouses’ attachment, our results speak to the importance of considering the moderation of RTT’s mechanistic pathways with particular emphasis on partners who vary in relationship security and interpersonal vulnerabilities\",\"PeriodicalId\":51521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"317 - 343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关系动荡理论(RTT)阐述了解释配偶为什么认为他们的婚姻是混乱的过程。具体而言,RTT预测,关系的不确定性会使对婚姻的认知评估产生偏差,伴侣对日常生活的干扰会加剧对配偶的负面情绪,这两者都会导致关系动荡。我们的研究证实了婚姻中的这些理论过程。然而,通过将依恋理论预测纳入RTT以进一步告知这些过程,我们证明RTT的机制并非对所有配偶都相同,因为它们取决于个人的依恋维度。对远端结果的潜在剖面分析结果表明,RTT的关系参数在配偶的依恋风格之间存在差异,条件过程模型的结果表明,在依恋回避和焦虑方面都较高的配偶通过理论化过程经历了最多的关系动荡。由于RTT的关系参数和过程因配偶的依恋而不同,我们的研究结果表明了考虑RTT机制途径的适度性的重要性,特别强调关系安全性和人际脆弱性不同的伴侣
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relational turbulence processes among avoidant and anxious spouses
ABSTRACT Relational turbulence theory (RTT) articulates processes that explain why spouses evaluate their marriages as chaotic. Specifically, RTT predicts that relational uncertainty biases cognitive appraisals about the marriage and that partner interference with daily routines heightens negative emotions toward the spouse, both of which, culminate in relational turbulence. Our study confirmed these theoretical processes in marriage. However, by integrating attachment theory predictions into RTT to further inform these processes, we demonstrated that RTT’s mechanisms were not the same for all spouses as they were dependent upon individuals’ attachment dimensions. Results of a latent profile analysis with distal outcomes indicated that RTT’s relationship parameters differed among spouses’ attachment styles, and results of conditional process models revealed that spouses who were higher in both attachment avoidance and anxiety experienced the most relational turbulence through theorized processes. Because RTT’s relationship parameters and processes differed by spouses’ attachment, our results speak to the importance of considering the moderation of RTT’s mechanistic pathways with particular emphasis on partners who vary in relationship security and interpersonal vulnerabilities
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY
COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
“Here’s what you can do to stop the spread”: Frames and mobilizing information in CDC’s social media messages during the COVID-19 pandemic The road from Teamsterville: Locating alternate approaches to the ethnography of communication Parsing communication duration and diagnostic question effects in deception detection Effects or use?: Examining the over-time effects of media use and racial resentment Understanding the influence of student expectations of instructor immediate behaviors on AI-based education: the moderating role of social presence of AI instructors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1