介入心脏病学中的晶状体剂量评估

A. Zagorska, V. Gelev, I. Jeleva, N. Stoyanov, D. Ivanova
{"title":"介入心脏病学中的晶状体剂量评估","authors":"A. Zagorska, V. Gelev, I. Jeleva, N. Stoyanov, D. Ivanova","doi":"10.3897/bgcardio.28.e89578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical professionals performing fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures in cardiology are exposed to a risk of radiation induced cataract, especially if the eye lens dose exceeds the annual dose limit of 20 mSv. Aim: The aim of the current study is to measure the eye lens exposure in three interventional cardiology departments, to analyze the relationship between patient dose and eye lens dose and to study the effectiveness of lead goggles without side protection. Material and methods: Measurements were performed in three departments with participation of 4 interventional cardiologists and 6 nurses. The exposure of the eye lens was measured with EYE-DTM (Radcard) passive dosimeters. Results: For nurses the annual eye lens dose varied from 1.6 mSv to 4.3 mSv. For the interventional cardiologists the results were between 3.2 mSv and 31.4 mSv. The dose reduction factor of the studied safety goggles without side protection is 1 and 1.1. Conclusions: There is a risk of exceeding the annual exposure limit of 20 mSv among interventional cardiologists The eye lens exposure depends on the workload and the clinical complexity of the procedures, as well as on the use of radiation protection devices. Due to the specifics of the procedures, the use of goggles with side protection is recommended. The eye lens dose for nurses is lower than the annual limit, which can be explained with the larger distance between the patient and the nurses and partial shielding by the main operator. Lead glasses without side shielding are not recommended because the exposure occurs from the side.","PeriodicalId":33976,"journal":{"name":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye lens dose assessment in interventional cardiology\",\"authors\":\"A. Zagorska, V. Gelev, I. Jeleva, N. Stoyanov, D. Ivanova\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/bgcardio.28.e89578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Medical professionals performing fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures in cardiology are exposed to a risk of radiation induced cataract, especially if the eye lens dose exceeds the annual dose limit of 20 mSv. Aim: The aim of the current study is to measure the eye lens exposure in three interventional cardiology departments, to analyze the relationship between patient dose and eye lens dose and to study the effectiveness of lead goggles without side protection. Material and methods: Measurements were performed in three departments with participation of 4 interventional cardiologists and 6 nurses. The exposure of the eye lens was measured with EYE-DTM (Radcard) passive dosimeters. Results: For nurses the annual eye lens dose varied from 1.6 mSv to 4.3 mSv. For the interventional cardiologists the results were between 3.2 mSv and 31.4 mSv. The dose reduction factor of the studied safety goggles without side protection is 1 and 1.1. Conclusions: There is a risk of exceeding the annual exposure limit of 20 mSv among interventional cardiologists The eye lens exposure depends on the workload and the clinical complexity of the procedures, as well as on the use of radiation protection devices. Due to the specifics of the procedures, the use of goggles with side protection is recommended. The eye lens dose for nurses is lower than the annual limit, which can be explained with the larger distance between the patient and the nurses and partial shielding by the main operator. Lead glasses without side shielding are not recommended because the exposure occurs from the side.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"B''lgarska kardiologiia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"B''lgarska kardiologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/bgcardio.28.e89578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/bgcardio.28.e89578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在心脏病学中进行透视引导介入手术的医疗专业人员面临着辐射诱发白内障的风险,特别是当眼晶状体剂量超过20毫西弗的年剂量限制时。目的:本研究的目的是测量三个介入心内科的眼晶状体暴露情况,分析患者剂量与眼晶状体剂量的关系,研究无侧护铅护目镜的有效性。材料和方法:在3个科室进行测量,4名介入心脏科医师和6名护士参与。采用eye - dtm (Radcard)被动剂量计测定眼球晶状体暴露。结果:护理人员晶状体年剂量为1.6 ~ 4.3毫西弗。对于介入心脏病专家,结果在3.2毫西弗到31.4毫西弗之间。所研究的无侧护护目镜的剂量减小系数分别为1和1.1。结论:介入心脏病专家存在超过20毫西弗的年暴露限值的风险。眼晶状体暴露取决于工作量和临床手术的复杂性,以及辐射防护装置的使用。由于手术的特殊性,建议使用带侧面保护的护目镜。护理人员的晶状体剂量低于年度限定剂量,这可能与患者与护理人员的距离较大以及主要操作人员的部分遮挡有关。不建议使用没有侧面屏蔽的铅玻璃,因为暴露是从侧面发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eye lens dose assessment in interventional cardiology
Introduction: Medical professionals performing fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures in cardiology are exposed to a risk of radiation induced cataract, especially if the eye lens dose exceeds the annual dose limit of 20 mSv. Aim: The aim of the current study is to measure the eye lens exposure in three interventional cardiology departments, to analyze the relationship between patient dose and eye lens dose and to study the effectiveness of lead goggles without side protection. Material and methods: Measurements were performed in three departments with participation of 4 interventional cardiologists and 6 nurses. The exposure of the eye lens was measured with EYE-DTM (Radcard) passive dosimeters. Results: For nurses the annual eye lens dose varied from 1.6 mSv to 4.3 mSv. For the interventional cardiologists the results were between 3.2 mSv and 31.4 mSv. The dose reduction factor of the studied safety goggles without side protection is 1 and 1.1. Conclusions: There is a risk of exceeding the annual exposure limit of 20 mSv among interventional cardiologists The eye lens exposure depends on the workload and the clinical complexity of the procedures, as well as on the use of radiation protection devices. Due to the specifics of the procedures, the use of goggles with side protection is recommended. The eye lens dose for nurses is lower than the annual limit, which can be explained with the larger distance between the patient and the nurses and partial shielding by the main operator. Lead glasses without side shielding are not recommended because the exposure occurs from the side.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contemporary approach to st elevation myocardial infarction in very young Long term effect of renal denervation on 24 hour abpm blood pressure variability and blood pressure load parameters Blood pressure and hypertension in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with long duration Cardiac myxoma – two clinical cases with a different presentation Opportunistic screening for hypertension in the general population in Bulgaria: international society of hypertension may measurement month campaign
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1