欧盟反虚假信息政策的产生和演变:数字技术监管中的企业家精神和政治机会主义

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2022-11-26 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2022.2150842
Veronika Datzer, L. Lonardo
{"title":"欧盟反虚假信息政策的产生和演变:数字技术监管中的企业家精神和政治机会主义","authors":"Veronika Datzer, L. Lonardo","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2022.2150842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Disinformation, the deliberate spread of false or misleading information, is a worrisome threat for the EU, as its uses in recent events such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 reveal. This article explores policy-formulation in the EU. It asks whether it is possible to explain the choice of the European Commission and of the European External Action Service (EEAS) to regulate disinformation in terms of political opportunism: using process tracing analysis supported by interviews with EU officials, this article finds that the European Commission sought to create an opportunity to regulate this matter because it considered it particularly salient, and that, contrary to what the literature on political opportunism might suggest, both the EEAS and the Commission can be considered the political entrepreneur in this domain, because the engagements against disinformation were led by an external threat perception.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"45 1","pages":"751 - 766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genesis and evolution of EU anti disinformation policy: entrepreneurship and political opportunism in the regulation of digital technology\",\"authors\":\"Veronika Datzer, L. Lonardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07036337.2022.2150842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Disinformation, the deliberate spread of false or misleading information, is a worrisome threat for the EU, as its uses in recent events such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 reveal. This article explores policy-formulation in the EU. It asks whether it is possible to explain the choice of the European Commission and of the European External Action Service (EEAS) to regulate disinformation in terms of political opportunism: using process tracing analysis supported by interviews with EU officials, this article finds that the European Commission sought to create an opportunity to regulate this matter because it considered it particularly salient, and that, contrary to what the literature on political opportunism might suggest, both the EEAS and the Commission can be considered the political entrepreneur in this domain, because the engagements against disinformation were led by an external threat perception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"751 - 766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2150842\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2150842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

虚假信息,即故意传播虚假或误导性信息,对欧盟来说是一个令人担忧的威胁,正如它在最近的事件中所使用的那样,例如俄罗斯在2022年入侵乌克兰。本文探讨了欧盟的政策制定。它询问是否有可能解释欧盟委员会和欧洲对外行动处(EEAS)在政治机会主义方面对虚假信息进行监管的选择:通过对欧盟官员的访谈,本文发现欧盟委员会试图创造一个机会来规范这一问题,因为它认为这一问题特别突出,而且,与政治机会主义的文献可能暗示的相反,EEAS和委员会都可以被认为是这一领域的政治企业家,因为反对虚假信息的参与是由外部威胁感知主导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genesis and evolution of EU anti disinformation policy: entrepreneurship and political opportunism in the regulation of digital technology
ABSTRACT Disinformation, the deliberate spread of false or misleading information, is a worrisome threat for the EU, as its uses in recent events such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 reveal. This article explores policy-formulation in the EU. It asks whether it is possible to explain the choice of the European Commission and of the European External Action Service (EEAS) to regulate disinformation in terms of political opportunism: using process tracing analysis supported by interviews with EU officials, this article finds that the European Commission sought to create an opportunity to regulate this matter because it considered it particularly salient, and that, contrary to what the literature on political opportunism might suggest, both the EEAS and the Commission can be considered the political entrepreneur in this domain, because the engagements against disinformation were led by an external threat perception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
External shocks, policy spillovers, and veto players: (post)exceptionalist common agricultural policy and the case of the 2023-2027 reform The Roma and the double-movement of Social Europe Democracy and European Union: beyond the dichotomy The quiet politics of migration supranationalization – Commission entrepreneurship and the intra-Corporate Transferee Directive The COVID-19 pandemic and institutional change in the EU’s financial assistance regime: the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1