2022年门源6.9级地震前后垂直形变及前兆分析

IF 2.8 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geodesy and Geodynamics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.geog.2023.03.005
Sixin Zhang, Peng Jia, Bowen Hou, Ming Hao
{"title":"2022年门源6.9级地震前后垂直形变及前兆分析","authors":"Sixin Zhang,&nbsp;Peng Jia,&nbsp;Bowen Hou,&nbsp;Ming Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.geog.2023.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzed the vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan <em>M</em>s6.9 earthquake in Qinghai Province, China, using leveling profiles across faults measured from Minle County in Gansu Province to Menyuan County in Qinghai Province. Our results suggest the following: (1) The amplitude of regional vertical differential motion near the Sunna-Qilian and Lenglongling faults within the Qilian Shan increased before the 2022 Menyuan earthquake. It was accompanied by the emergence of high gradient deformation zones. Deformation at the Tongziba cross-fault leveling site near the Sunan-Qilian fault was considerable. In contrast, deformation at the Daliang cross-fault leveling site near the stepover region (adjacent to the epicenter) between the Lenglongling and Tuolaishan faults was minor. After 2018, vertical deformation at the Tongziba site notably accelerated, while that at the Daliang site was insignificant. (2) After the 2022 Menyuan earthquake, 140–150 mm of subsidence deformation occurred near the Daliang site, while the Tongziba site did not experience significant deformation. (3) Vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan earthquake conforms with the elastic-rebound theory, and the evolution of pre-earthquake deformation was consistent with the strike-slip fault deformation pattern at different seismogenic stages, i.e., the relative motion near the locked fault in the late seismogenic stage gradually weakened. The characteristics of strain accumulation and release derived from the vertical deformation before and after the Menyuan <em>M</em><sub>S</sub>6.9 earthquake help understand the deformation process of earthquake preparation and earthquake precursors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46398,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","volume":"14 6","pages":"Pages 582-588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498472300037X/pdfft?md5=d62523c1580499065e85dc7d30b5ca0c&pid=1-s2.0-S167498472300037X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake and analysis of earthquake precursors\",\"authors\":\"Sixin Zhang,&nbsp;Peng Jia,&nbsp;Bowen Hou,&nbsp;Ming Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geog.2023.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study analyzed the vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan <em>M</em>s6.9 earthquake in Qinghai Province, China, using leveling profiles across faults measured from Minle County in Gansu Province to Menyuan County in Qinghai Province. Our results suggest the following: (1) The amplitude of regional vertical differential motion near the Sunna-Qilian and Lenglongling faults within the Qilian Shan increased before the 2022 Menyuan earthquake. It was accompanied by the emergence of high gradient deformation zones. Deformation at the Tongziba cross-fault leveling site near the Sunan-Qilian fault was considerable. In contrast, deformation at the Daliang cross-fault leveling site near the stepover region (adjacent to the epicenter) between the Lenglongling and Tuolaishan faults was minor. After 2018, vertical deformation at the Tongziba site notably accelerated, while that at the Daliang site was insignificant. (2) After the 2022 Menyuan earthquake, 140–150 mm of subsidence deformation occurred near the Daliang site, while the Tongziba site did not experience significant deformation. (3) Vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan earthquake conforms with the elastic-rebound theory, and the evolution of pre-earthquake deformation was consistent with the strike-slip fault deformation pattern at different seismogenic stages, i.e., the relative motion near the locked fault in the late seismogenic stage gradually weakened. The characteristics of strain accumulation and release derived from the vertical deformation before and after the Menyuan <em>M</em><sub>S</sub>6.9 earthquake help understand the deformation process of earthquake preparation and earthquake precursors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geodesy and Geodynamics\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 582-588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498472300037X/pdfft?md5=d62523c1580499065e85dc7d30b5ca0c&pid=1-s2.0-S167498472300037X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geodesy and Geodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498472300037X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498472300037X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用从甘肃民乐县到青海门源县的断层测深剖面,分析了2022年青海门源6.9级地震前后的垂直形变。结果表明:(1)2022年门源地震前,祁连山内孙纳—祁连断裂和冷龙岭断裂附近区域垂直差动幅度增大。伴随着高梯度变形带的出现。苏南-祁连断裂带附近的桐子坝断裂带变形较大。而在冷龙岭和沱莱山断裂之间靠近震源的陡坡区(靠近震中)的大梁跨断层平地处,变形较小。2018年以后,铜子坝站点的垂直变形明显加速,而大梁站点的垂直变形不明显。(2) 2022年门源地震后,大梁场址附近发生了140 ~ 150 mm的沉降变形,而铜子坝场址没有发生明显的沉降变形。(3) 2022年门源地震前后垂向变形符合弹性—回弹理论,震前变形演化与不同孕震阶段走滑断层变形模式一致,即孕震晚期闭锁断层附近相对运动逐渐减弱。门源MS6.9地震前后垂直形变的应变积累与释放特征有助于了解地震准备和前兆的形变过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake and analysis of earthquake precursors

This study analyzed the vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake in Qinghai Province, China, using leveling profiles across faults measured from Minle County in Gansu Province to Menyuan County in Qinghai Province. Our results suggest the following: (1) The amplitude of regional vertical differential motion near the Sunna-Qilian and Lenglongling faults within the Qilian Shan increased before the 2022 Menyuan earthquake. It was accompanied by the emergence of high gradient deformation zones. Deformation at the Tongziba cross-fault leveling site near the Sunan-Qilian fault was considerable. In contrast, deformation at the Daliang cross-fault leveling site near the stepover region (adjacent to the epicenter) between the Lenglongling and Tuolaishan faults was minor. After 2018, vertical deformation at the Tongziba site notably accelerated, while that at the Daliang site was insignificant. (2) After the 2022 Menyuan earthquake, 140–150 mm of subsidence deformation occurred near the Daliang site, while the Tongziba site did not experience significant deformation. (3) Vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan earthquake conforms with the elastic-rebound theory, and the evolution of pre-earthquake deformation was consistent with the strike-slip fault deformation pattern at different seismogenic stages, i.e., the relative motion near the locked fault in the late seismogenic stage gradually weakened. The characteristics of strain accumulation and release derived from the vertical deformation before and after the Menyuan MS6.9 earthquake help understand the deformation process of earthquake preparation and earthquake precursors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Geodesy and Geodynamics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
566
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Geodesy and Geodynamics launched in October, 2010, and is a bimonthly publication. It is sponsored jointly by Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Science Press, and another six agencies. It is an international journal with a Chinese heart. Geodesy and Geodynamics is committed to the publication of quality scientific papers in English in the fields of geodesy and geodynamics from authors around the world. Its aim is to promote a combination between Geodesy and Geodynamics, deepen the application of Geodesy in the field of Geoscience and quicken worldwide fellows'' understanding on scientific research activity in China. It mainly publishes newest research achievements in the field of Geodesy, Geodynamics, Science of Disaster and so on. Aims and Scope: new theories and methods of geodesy; new results of monitoring and studying crustal movement and deformation by using geodetic theories and methods; new ways and achievements in earthquake-prediction investigation by using geodetic theories and methods; new results of crustal movement and deformation studies by using other geologic, hydrological, and geophysical theories and methods; new results of satellite gravity measurements; new development and results of space-to-ground observation technology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Present-day movement characteristics of the Qinghai Nanshan fault and its surrounding area from GPS observation Probing signals of atmospheric gravity waves excited by the July 29, 2021 MW8.2 Alaska earthquake Inversion method of deflection of the vertical based on SWOT wide-swath altimeter data Assessment of the performance of the TOPGNSS and ANN-MB antennas for ionospheric measurements using low-cost u-blox GNSS receivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1