商业和政治关系对供应商选择决策的影响:以尼日利亚公共部门为例

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2018-10-27 DOI:10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859
E. E. Essien, A. Konstantopoulou, Ioannis Konstopoulos, George Lodorfos
{"title":"商业和政治关系对供应商选择决策的影响:以尼日利亚公共部门为例","authors":"E. E. Essien, A. Konstantopoulou, Ioannis Konstopoulos, George Lodorfos","doi":"10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extant relevant literature suggests that nonmarket elements such as social ties are important strategic options that may help organisations enhance their competitiveness relative to other competitors when bidding for important supply jobs. However, our current understanding of their effects on organisational outcomes, especially in public supplier selection decisions in emerging economies, is far from complete. Using a sample of 342 experienced senior management team (SMT) members and senior level staff in 40 public sector organisations in Nigeria, this study examined the relative importance of business and political ties as sources of advantage and strategic intelligence for prospective vendors and contractors during strategic supplier selection decisions. Our findings show that both business and political ties are significant predictors of supplier selection outcomes, and their relative importance in the selection outcome is indistinguishable and key to strategic decision making. Overall, our result suggests that both business and political ties can be utilised as sources of important resources by supplier firms.","PeriodicalId":35015,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","volume":"13 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of business and political ties on supplier selection decisions: the case of the Nigerian public sector\",\"authors\":\"E. E. Essien, A. Konstantopoulou, Ioannis Konstopoulos, George Lodorfos\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extant relevant literature suggests that nonmarket elements such as social ties are important strategic options that may help organisations enhance their competitiveness relative to other competitors when bidding for important supply jobs. However, our current understanding of their effects on organisational outcomes, especially in public supplier selection decisions in emerging economies, is far from complete. Using a sample of 342 experienced senior management team (SMT) members and senior level staff in 40 public sector organisations in Nigeria, this study examined the relative importance of business and political ties as sources of advantage and strategic intelligence for prospective vendors and contractors during strategic supplier selection decisions. Our findings show that both business and political ties are significant predictors of supplier selection outcomes, and their relative importance in the selection outcome is indistinguishable and key to strategic decision making. Overall, our result suggests that both business and political ties can be utilised as sources of important resources by supplier firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现存的相关文献表明,社会关系等非市场因素是重要的战略选择,可以帮助组织在竞标重要的供应工作时提高相对于其他竞争者的竞争力。然而,我们目前对它们对组织结果的影响的理解,特别是在新兴经济体的公共供应商选择决策中,还远远不够完整。本研究以尼日利亚40个公共部门组织的342名经验丰富的高级管理团队(SMT)成员和高级员工为样本,考察了在战略供应商选择决策过程中,商业和政治关系作为优势和战略情报来源的相对重要性。我们的研究结果表明,商业和政治关系都是供应商选择结果的重要预测因素,它们在选择结果中的相对重要性是不可区分的,并且是战略决策的关键。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,商业和政治关系都可以作为供应商企业重要资源的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of business and political ties on supplier selection decisions: the case of the Nigerian public sector
Extant relevant literature suggests that nonmarket elements such as social ties are important strategic options that may help organisations enhance their competitiveness relative to other competitors when bidding for important supply jobs. However, our current understanding of their effects on organisational outcomes, especially in public supplier selection decisions in emerging economies, is far from complete. Using a sample of 342 experienced senior management team (SMT) members and senior level staff in 40 public sector organisations in Nigeria, this study examined the relative importance of business and political ties as sources of advantage and strategic intelligence for prospective vendors and contractors during strategic supplier selection decisions. Our findings show that both business and political ties are significant predictors of supplier selection outcomes, and their relative importance in the selection outcome is indistinguishable and key to strategic decision making. Overall, our result suggests that both business and political ties can be utilised as sources of important resources by supplier firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The IJFIP has been established as a peer reviewed, international authoritative reference in the field. It publishes high calibre academic articles dealing with knowledge creation, diffusion and utilisation in innovation policy. The journal thus covers all types of Strategic Intelligence (SI). SI is defined as the set of actions that search, process, diffuse and protect information in order to make it available to the right person at the right time in order to make the right decision. Examples of SI in the domain of innovation include Foresight, Forecasting, Delphi studies, Technology Assessment, Benchmarking, R&D evaluation and Technology Roadmapping.
期刊最新文献
Actual strategic directions for the development of Russian fuel and energy companies to ensure the country's economic security Strategic foresight for competitive advantage: A future-oriented business and competitive analysis techniques selection model Size does matter: South Africa's automotive industry during and post the COVID-19 pandemic Futures of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, including Computer Science (STEM/CS) Education: What will the crossroad with Liberal Arts look like Forecasting New Product Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1