机器人辅助肾部分切除术的建议和最佳方法:巴西专家的共识

E. Faria, M. Moschovas, C. Vaz, A. Pompeo, A. Santos, A. Stievano, A. Berger, A. Carneiro, A. Dourado, J. R. Colombo, C. Passerotti, C. Andreoni, Clovis Fraga, G. Guglielmetti, G. Lemos, Gustavo Guimarães, L. Nogueira, M. Rocha, P. Melo, Paulo B O Arantes, P. Romanelli, R. Tourinho, R. Nishimoto, R. Machado, R. Reis, Rodrigo Frota, R. Guida, Victor T. Dubeux, R. Gualberto, M. Tobias-Machado
{"title":"机器人辅助肾部分切除术的建议和最佳方法:巴西专家的共识","authors":"E. Faria, M. Moschovas, C. Vaz, A. Pompeo, A. Santos, A. Stievano, A. Berger, A. Carneiro, A. Dourado, J. R. Colombo, C. Passerotti, C. Andreoni, Clovis Fraga, G. Guglielmetti, G. Lemos, Gustavo Guimarães, L. Nogueira, M. Rocha, P. Melo, Paulo B O Arantes, P. Romanelli, R. Tourinho, R. Nishimoto, R. Machado, R. Reis, Rodrigo Frota, R. Guida, Victor T. Dubeux, R. Gualberto, M. Tobias-Machado","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2023.1119494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is established as the gold standard approach to treating small renal masses. However, numerous technical challenges and concepts related to this approach are still under discussion and are not consensus among surgeons from different centers. We performed an online questionnaire with multiple topics about RAPN and selected high-volume surgeons from referral centers in Brazil to achieve a consensus. Methods We implemented an online consensus of 29 experts selected based on surgical expertise and competence in analyzing the published literature. Based on the collected literature and current Guidelines (NCCN, AUA, and EAU) we created a questionnaire with 131 questions and administered it to all participants. The statements and the Delphi technique design were combined in a single round of questions. The answers were reviewed, 70% of concordance was considered a consensus, and a final manuscript with recommendations was developed. Results We divided our results into 25 subtopics that included all questions and discussions of the questionnaire, including preoperative settings, surgical technique, pathological analysis, technology use, and challenging cases. Some areas had limited data in the literature, and these potential limitations were addressed and discussed on each topic. Conclusion RAPN is the standard surgical treatment for renal masses in the centers of robotic surgery. Among the important topics of this study, we recommend always performing the first RAPN cases with proctors’ assistance, conducting preoperative planning using good-quality imaging exams, minimizing the amount of renal parenchyma removed, and achieving appropriate hemostatic suture while reducing renal parenchyma ischemia.","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations and optimal approaches to robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: A consensus of Brazilian experts\",\"authors\":\"E. Faria, M. Moschovas, C. Vaz, A. Pompeo, A. Santos, A. Stievano, A. Berger, A. Carneiro, A. Dourado, J. R. Colombo, C. Passerotti, C. Andreoni, Clovis Fraga, G. Guglielmetti, G. Lemos, Gustavo Guimarães, L. Nogueira, M. Rocha, P. Melo, Paulo B O Arantes, P. Romanelli, R. Tourinho, R. Nishimoto, R. Machado, R. Reis, Rodrigo Frota, R. Guida, Victor T. Dubeux, R. Gualberto, M. Tobias-Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fruro.2023.1119494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is established as the gold standard approach to treating small renal masses. However, numerous technical challenges and concepts related to this approach are still under discussion and are not consensus among surgeons from different centers. We performed an online questionnaire with multiple topics about RAPN and selected high-volume surgeons from referral centers in Brazil to achieve a consensus. Methods We implemented an online consensus of 29 experts selected based on surgical expertise and competence in analyzing the published literature. Based on the collected literature and current Guidelines (NCCN, AUA, and EAU) we created a questionnaire with 131 questions and administered it to all participants. The statements and the Delphi technique design were combined in a single round of questions. The answers were reviewed, 70% of concordance was considered a consensus, and a final manuscript with recommendations was developed. Results We divided our results into 25 subtopics that included all questions and discussions of the questionnaire, including preoperative settings, surgical technique, pathological analysis, technology use, and challenging cases. Some areas had limited data in the literature, and these potential limitations were addressed and discussed on each topic. Conclusion RAPN is the standard surgical treatment for renal masses in the centers of robotic surgery. Among the important topics of this study, we recommend always performing the first RAPN cases with proctors’ assistance, conducting preoperative planning using good-quality imaging exams, minimizing the amount of renal parenchyma removed, and achieving appropriate hemostatic suture while reducing renal parenchyma ischemia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1119494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1119494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的建立机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN)作为治疗小肾脏肿块的金标准方法。然而,与这种方法相关的许多技术挑战和概念仍在讨论中,来自不同中心的外科医生之间尚未达成共识。我们进行了一项关于RAPN的多个主题的在线问卷调查,并从巴西的转诊中心选择了大量外科医生,以达成共识。方法根据外科专业知识和分析已发表文献的能力,我们在网上达成了29名专家的共识。根据收集的文献和现行指南(NCCN、AUA和EAU),我们制作了一份包含131个问题的问卷,并对所有参与者进行了管理。这些陈述和Delphi技术设计结合在一轮问题中。对答案进行了审查,70%的一致性被认为是共识,并制定了带有建议的最终手稿。结果我们将结果分为25个子主题,包括问卷的所有问题和讨论,包括术前设置、手术技术、病理分析、技术使用和具有挑战性的病例。一些领域的文献数据有限,这些潜在的局限性在每个主题上都得到了解决和讨论。结论RAPN是在机器人手术中心治疗肾脏肿块的标准手术方法。在本研究的重要主题中,我们建议始终在监考医生的协助下进行第一例RAPN病例,使用高质量的成像检查进行术前计划,最大限度地减少肾实质的切除量,并在减少肾实质缺血的同时实现适当的止血缝合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations and optimal approaches to robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: A consensus of Brazilian experts
Objective Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is established as the gold standard approach to treating small renal masses. However, numerous technical challenges and concepts related to this approach are still under discussion and are not consensus among surgeons from different centers. We performed an online questionnaire with multiple topics about RAPN and selected high-volume surgeons from referral centers in Brazil to achieve a consensus. Methods We implemented an online consensus of 29 experts selected based on surgical expertise and competence in analyzing the published literature. Based on the collected literature and current Guidelines (NCCN, AUA, and EAU) we created a questionnaire with 131 questions and administered it to all participants. The statements and the Delphi technique design were combined in a single round of questions. The answers were reviewed, 70% of concordance was considered a consensus, and a final manuscript with recommendations was developed. Results We divided our results into 25 subtopics that included all questions and discussions of the questionnaire, including preoperative settings, surgical technique, pathological analysis, technology use, and challenging cases. Some areas had limited data in the literature, and these potential limitations were addressed and discussed on each topic. Conclusion RAPN is the standard surgical treatment for renal masses in the centers of robotic surgery. Among the important topics of this study, we recommend always performing the first RAPN cases with proctors’ assistance, conducting preoperative planning using good-quality imaging exams, minimizing the amount of renal parenchyma removed, and achieving appropriate hemostatic suture while reducing renal parenchyma ischemia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reducing time from presentation to surgical intervention for testicular torsion: implementation of a quality improvement protocol Clinical and environmental considerations for neonatal, office-based circumcisions compared with operative circumcisions Case report: Para-testicular spindle cell lipoma suspected of well-differentiated liposarcoma Lights and shadows on local recurrence after renal surgery: when, why and how to manage Long-term follow-up results of prostate capsule-sparing and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with neobladder: a single-center retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1