{"title":"以Hexagon欺诈和政府内部审计师为中介变量的印尼地方政府财务报表欺诈防范分析","authors":"Fitria Magdalena Suprapto, Dian Agustia","doi":"10.1080/08039410.2023.2232365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to examine the six components of hexagon fraud which include: financial pressure, change of leadership, whistleblowing system, auditor opinion, education of head government and procurement system to fraudulent financial statements that occur in local government in Indonesia. In addition, this study also places the APIP (Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus) as a moderating variable. This study uses data from 1,419 financial statements in local government in Indonesia during the 2018–2020 period. The sampling technique is purposive sampling with the judgment sampling method. The research hypothesis was tested using Ordinary Least Squares regression. The results of the study show that only financial pressure and auditor opinion have a significant effect on fraudulent financial statements in local governments in Indonesia. In addition, evidence was found that APIP moderated the relationship between financial pressure and auditor opinion with fraudulent financial statements. This shows that APIP plays a role in mitigating fraudulent financial statements. This research is the first to test the hexagon theory to the financial statements environment in local government in Indonesia which contributes to integrating the role of APIP as a form of preventing financial statement fraud.","PeriodicalId":45207,"journal":{"name":"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","volume":"50 1","pages":"513 - 537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Statements Prevention Using Hexagon’s Fraud and Government Internal Auditor as Moderating Variable in Local Government in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Fitria Magdalena Suprapto, Dian Agustia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08039410.2023.2232365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study aims to examine the six components of hexagon fraud which include: financial pressure, change of leadership, whistleblowing system, auditor opinion, education of head government and procurement system to fraudulent financial statements that occur in local government in Indonesia. In addition, this study also places the APIP (Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus) as a moderating variable. This study uses data from 1,419 financial statements in local government in Indonesia during the 2018–2020 period. The sampling technique is purposive sampling with the judgment sampling method. The research hypothesis was tested using Ordinary Least Squares regression. The results of the study show that only financial pressure and auditor opinion have a significant effect on fraudulent financial statements in local governments in Indonesia. In addition, evidence was found that APIP moderated the relationship between financial pressure and auditor opinion with fraudulent financial statements. This shows that APIP plays a role in mitigating fraudulent financial statements. This research is the first to test the hexagon theory to the financial statements environment in local government in Indonesia which contributes to integrating the role of APIP as a form of preventing financial statement fraud.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"513 - 537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2023.2232365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2023.2232365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Statements Prevention Using Hexagon’s Fraud and Government Internal Auditor as Moderating Variable in Local Government in Indonesia
Abstract This study aims to examine the six components of hexagon fraud which include: financial pressure, change of leadership, whistleblowing system, auditor opinion, education of head government and procurement system to fraudulent financial statements that occur in local government in Indonesia. In addition, this study also places the APIP (Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus) as a moderating variable. This study uses data from 1,419 financial statements in local government in Indonesia during the 2018–2020 period. The sampling technique is purposive sampling with the judgment sampling method. The research hypothesis was tested using Ordinary Least Squares regression. The results of the study show that only financial pressure and auditor opinion have a significant effect on fraudulent financial statements in local governments in Indonesia. In addition, evidence was found that APIP moderated the relationship between financial pressure and auditor opinion with fraudulent financial statements. This shows that APIP plays a role in mitigating fraudulent financial statements. This research is the first to test the hexagon theory to the financial statements environment in local government in Indonesia which contributes to integrating the role of APIP as a form of preventing financial statement fraud.
期刊介绍:
Forum for Development Studies was established in 1974, and soon became the leading Norwegian journal for development research. While this position has been consolidated, Forum has gradually become an international journal, with its main constituency in the Nordic countries. The journal is owned by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and the Norwegian Association for Development Research. Forum aims to be a platform for development research broadly defined – including the social sciences, economics, history and law. All articles are double-blind peer-reviewed. In order to maintain the journal as a meeting place for different disciplines, we encourage authors to communicate across disciplinary boundaries. Contributions that limit the use of exclusive terminology and frame the questions explored in ways that are accessible to the whole range of the Journal''s readership will be given priority.