登革热地方性对自动血液分析仪识别疟疾的影响——Beckman-Coulter LH750:一项基于医院的横断面研究

Reshma G. Kini, Nidhi Manoj, A. Amin, C. Moras, N. Marla
{"title":"登革热地方性对自动血液分析仪识别疟疾的影响——Beckman-Coulter LH750:一项基于医院的横断面研究","authors":"Reshma G. Kini, Nidhi Manoj, A. Amin, C. Moras, N. Marla","doi":"10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_29_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Automated hematology analyzers have been used to develop indices and algorithms for diagnosing malaria. We believe that the practical utility of such indices depends on the infection profile in the community since the type of infection determines the hematological parameters and consequently their power to discriminate malaria. Our region is endemic for malaria and dengue. Our aim was to verify the utility of the published malaria factor (MF) in our setting. Materials and Methods: Anticoagulated blood from clinically suspected cases of malaria and dengue were analyzed. The standard deviation and mean (M) values of all the leukocytes were obtained and the MF was calculated. Results: The MF showed a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 55.1% in identifying malaria at a cutoff of 4.2 when the control group (CG) included dengue-positive (DP) patients and a sensitivity and specificity of 93.4% and 65.2% when the CG did not include DP cases. Using another set of parameters, we developed a Malaria Discriminant Index which showed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.4% and 73.9% in identifying malaria in the absence of dengue at a cutoff of 1.19 and a sensitivity and specificity of 85.5% and 61.7% at a cut off of 1.26 when dengue patients were included in the CG. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the need to verify the utility of indices/factors developed in regions not having similar endemic profiles before utilizing them in the clinical setting as other infections can influence the discriminant capacity.","PeriodicalId":19108,"journal":{"name":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of dengue endemicity on malaria identification by automated hematology analyzer – Beckman Coulter LH750: A hospital-based cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Reshma G. Kini, Nidhi Manoj, A. Amin, C. Moras, N. Marla\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_29_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Automated hematology analyzers have been used to develop indices and algorithms for diagnosing malaria. We believe that the practical utility of such indices depends on the infection profile in the community since the type of infection determines the hematological parameters and consequently their power to discriminate malaria. Our region is endemic for malaria and dengue. Our aim was to verify the utility of the published malaria factor (MF) in our setting. Materials and Methods: Anticoagulated blood from clinically suspected cases of malaria and dengue were analyzed. The standard deviation and mean (M) values of all the leukocytes were obtained and the MF was calculated. Results: The MF showed a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 55.1% in identifying malaria at a cutoff of 4.2 when the control group (CG) included dengue-positive (DP) patients and a sensitivity and specificity of 93.4% and 65.2% when the CG did not include DP cases. Using another set of parameters, we developed a Malaria Discriminant Index which showed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.4% and 73.9% in identifying malaria in the absence of dengue at a cutoff of 1.19 and a sensitivity and specificity of 85.5% and 61.7% at a cut off of 1.26 when dengue patients were included in the CG. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the need to verify the utility of indices/factors developed in regions not having similar endemic profiles before utilizing them in the clinical setting as other infections can influence the discriminant capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_29_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_29_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自动血液分析仪已被用于开发诊断疟疾的指标和算法。我们认为,这些指数的实际效用取决于社区中的感染情况,因为感染类型决定了血液学参数,从而决定了它们辨别疟疾的能力。我们地区是疟疾和登革热的地方病。我们的目的是验证已发表的疟疾因子(MF)在我们的环境中的效用。材料与方法:对临床疑似疟疾和登革热患者的抗凝血液进行分析。获得所有白细胞的标准偏差和平均值(M),并计算MF。结果:当对照组(CG)包括登革热阳性(DP)患者时,MF在识别疟疾方面的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和55.1%,当对照组不包括DP病例时,MF的敏感性和特异度分别为93.4%和65.2%。使用另一组参数,我们开发了一个疟疾判别指数,该指数在没有登革热的情况下识别疟疾的敏感性和特异性分别为94.4%和73.9%,在将登革热患者纳入CG的情况下,在1.26的情况下的敏感性和特异性分别为85.5%和61.7%。结论:本研究强调,在临床应用之前,需要验证在没有相似地方病特征的地区开发的指标/因素的效用,因为其他感染会影响判别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of dengue endemicity on malaria identification by automated hematology analyzer – Beckman Coulter LH750: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
Aim: Automated hematology analyzers have been used to develop indices and algorithms for diagnosing malaria. We believe that the practical utility of such indices depends on the infection profile in the community since the type of infection determines the hematological parameters and consequently their power to discriminate malaria. Our region is endemic for malaria and dengue. Our aim was to verify the utility of the published malaria factor (MF) in our setting. Materials and Methods: Anticoagulated blood from clinically suspected cases of malaria and dengue were analyzed. The standard deviation and mean (M) values of all the leukocytes were obtained and the MF was calculated. Results: The MF showed a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 55.1% in identifying malaria at a cutoff of 4.2 when the control group (CG) included dengue-positive (DP) patients and a sensitivity and specificity of 93.4% and 65.2% when the CG did not include DP cases. Using another set of parameters, we developed a Malaria Discriminant Index which showed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.4% and 73.9% in identifying malaria in the absence of dengue at a cutoff of 1.19 and a sensitivity and specificity of 85.5% and 61.7% at a cut off of 1.26 when dengue patients were included in the CG. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the need to verify the utility of indices/factors developed in regions not having similar endemic profiles before utilizing them in the clinical setting as other infections can influence the discriminant capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical profile of term neonates requiring intervention for hyperbilirubinemia Evaluation of serum magnesium levels among type 2 diabetes individuals of a South Indian town Knowledge of E-Shram card among the rural population of Kurnool district in Andhra Pradesh: A cross-sectional study Human papilloma virus-related oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: An assessment of histomorphological features Influence of dengue endemicity on malaria identification by automated hematology analyzer – Beckman Coulter LH750: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1