历史生物地理学和保护生物学中的地方病:概念和含义

Q3 Environmental Science Biogeographia Pub Date : 2017-11-14 DOI:10.21426/B632136433
S. Fattorini
{"title":"历史生物地理学和保护生物学中的地方病:概念和含义","authors":"S. Fattorini","doi":"10.21426/B632136433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Fattorini, Simone | Abstract: Endemism is often misinterpreted as referring to narrow distributions (range restriction). In fact, a taxon is said to be endemic to an area if it lives there and nowhere else. The expression “endemic area” is used to identify the geographical area to which a taxon is native, whereas “area of endemism” indicates an area characterized by the overlapping distributions of two or more taxa. Among the methods used to identify areas of endemism, the optimality criterion seems to be more efficient than Parsimony Analysis of Endemism (PAE), although PAE may be useful to disclose hierarchical relationships among areas of endemism. PAE remains the best explored method and may represent a useful benchmark for testing other approaches. Recently proposed approaches, such as the analysis of nested areas of endemism, networks and neighborjoining, are promising, but need to be more widely tested. All these methods attempt to identify biogeographically homogeneous sets of areas characterized by shared species, without any attempt to evaluate their relative importance for conservation purposes. Analyses based on weighted endemism methods identify areas of endemism according to specie distributional rarity and phylogenetic position, being thus appropriate for conservation purposes. The proportion of endemic species to the total number of species living a given area is the most frequently used measure to rank areas according to their relative endemism. However, proportions obscure differences in raw numbers that can be important in conservation biology. Because the number of (endemic) species tends to increase with area, some authors proposed to model the endemics-area relationship and to consider the areas displaced above the fitting curve (i.e. those having a positive residual) as hotspots. However, the use of residuals may lead to areas being identified as hotspots for almost every size class of richness. Thus, it is important to evaluate the ability of the hotspots recovered by these procedures to really conserve total (endemic) species diversity.","PeriodicalId":37001,"journal":{"name":"Biogeographia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21426/B632136433","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endemism in historical biogeography and conservation biology: concepts and implications\",\"authors\":\"S. Fattorini\",\"doi\":\"10.21426/B632136433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Fattorini, Simone | Abstract: Endemism is often misinterpreted as referring to narrow distributions (range restriction). In fact, a taxon is said to be endemic to an area if it lives there and nowhere else. The expression “endemic area” is used to identify the geographical area to which a taxon is native, whereas “area of endemism” indicates an area characterized by the overlapping distributions of two or more taxa. Among the methods used to identify areas of endemism, the optimality criterion seems to be more efficient than Parsimony Analysis of Endemism (PAE), although PAE may be useful to disclose hierarchical relationships among areas of endemism. PAE remains the best explored method and may represent a useful benchmark for testing other approaches. Recently proposed approaches, such as the analysis of nested areas of endemism, networks and neighborjoining, are promising, but need to be more widely tested. All these methods attempt to identify biogeographically homogeneous sets of areas characterized by shared species, without any attempt to evaluate their relative importance for conservation purposes. Analyses based on weighted endemism methods identify areas of endemism according to specie distributional rarity and phylogenetic position, being thus appropriate for conservation purposes. The proportion of endemic species to the total number of species living a given area is the most frequently used measure to rank areas according to their relative endemism. However, proportions obscure differences in raw numbers that can be important in conservation biology. Because the number of (endemic) species tends to increase with area, some authors proposed to model the endemics-area relationship and to consider the areas displaced above the fitting curve (i.e. those having a positive residual) as hotspots. However, the use of residuals may lead to areas being identified as hotspots for almost every size class of richness. Thus, it is important to evaluate the ability of the hotspots recovered by these procedures to really conserve total (endemic) species diversity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biogeographia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21426/B632136433\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biogeographia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21426/B632136433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeographia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21426/B632136433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

作者:Fattorini,Simone |摘要:地方主义经常被误解为指狭窄的分布(范围限制)。事实上,如果一个分类单元生活在某个地区,而不在其他地方,那么它就被认为是该地区的特有种。“特有区”一词用于确定一个分类单元所属的地理区域,而“特有地区”则表示以两个或多个分类单元重叠分布为特征的区域。在用于识别地方性区域的方法中,最优性标准似乎比地方性分析(PAE)更有效,尽管PAE可能有助于揭示地方性区域之间的层次关系。PAE仍然是探索得最好的方法,可能是测试其他方法的有用基准。最近提出的方法,如对地方性嵌套区域、网络和邻居连接的分析,是有希望的,但需要进行更广泛的测试。所有这些方法都试图确定以共有物种为特征的生物地理上同质的区域,而没有试图评估它们对保护目的的相对重要性。基于加权特有性方法的分析根据物种分布稀有性和系统发育位置确定了特有性区域,因此适合于保护目的。特有物种占生活在特定地区的物种总数的比例是根据相对特有性对地区进行排名的最常用指标。然而,比例掩盖了原始数字的差异,这在保护生物学中可能很重要。由于(特有)物种的数量往往随着面积的增加而增加,一些作者建议对特有物种与面积的关系进行建模,并将位移超过拟合曲线的区域(即具有正残差的区域)视为热点。然而,残差的使用可能会导致几乎每种规模的丰富度都将区域确定为热点。因此,重要的是评估通过这些程序恢复的热点地区真正保护总(特有)物种多样性的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endemism in historical biogeography and conservation biology: concepts and implications
Author(s): Fattorini, Simone | Abstract: Endemism is often misinterpreted as referring to narrow distributions (range restriction). In fact, a taxon is said to be endemic to an area if it lives there and nowhere else. The expression “endemic area” is used to identify the geographical area to which a taxon is native, whereas “area of endemism” indicates an area characterized by the overlapping distributions of two or more taxa. Among the methods used to identify areas of endemism, the optimality criterion seems to be more efficient than Parsimony Analysis of Endemism (PAE), although PAE may be useful to disclose hierarchical relationships among areas of endemism. PAE remains the best explored method and may represent a useful benchmark for testing other approaches. Recently proposed approaches, such as the analysis of nested areas of endemism, networks and neighborjoining, are promising, but need to be more widely tested. All these methods attempt to identify biogeographically homogeneous sets of areas characterized by shared species, without any attempt to evaluate their relative importance for conservation purposes. Analyses based on weighted endemism methods identify areas of endemism according to specie distributional rarity and phylogenetic position, being thus appropriate for conservation purposes. The proportion of endemic species to the total number of species living a given area is the most frequently used measure to rank areas according to their relative endemism. However, proportions obscure differences in raw numbers that can be important in conservation biology. Because the number of (endemic) species tends to increase with area, some authors proposed to model the endemics-area relationship and to consider the areas displaced above the fitting curve (i.e. those having a positive residual) as hotspots. However, the use of residuals may lead to areas being identified as hotspots for almost every size class of richness. Thus, it is important to evaluate the ability of the hotspots recovered by these procedures to really conserve total (endemic) species diversity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biogeographia
Biogeographia Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Areas of endemism conservation hot spots of Paraguay: A study using a multiscale and diverse taxa approach Diversity of Platyhelminthes Proseriata in Western Mediterranean sandy beaches: a database of species occurrences and traits On the occurrence of Phallocryptus spinosus (Milne-Edwards, 1840) in Sicily (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) The new Checklist of the Italian Fauna: Odonata The diversity of Protura (Arthropoda, Hexapoda) in the Mediterranean area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1