COVID资本主义下的动物目击和引用:超越自由感伤主义

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-02 DOI:10.1353/fem.2021.0027
Sushmita Chatterjee, K. Asher
{"title":"COVID资本主义下的动物目击和引用:超越自由感伤主义","authors":"Sushmita Chatterjee, K. Asher","doi":"10.1353/fem.2021.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONVERSATIONS, NEWS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS about COVID are saturated with stories about animals: accounts of \"wild\" animals emerging and seen in cities around the world, an increase in the number of bird watchers, an astronomical rise in webcam views of wildlife, videos of zoo animals walking through their exhibition halls or through art museums and galleries. Animals are also getting adopted and fostered at an unprecedented rate, and pets appear on virtual meetings as never before. Since the World Health Organization's (who) official announcement of the coronavirus pandemic in March 2020, news reports related to meat are differently but equally prevalent: the disappearance of chicken and other meat from grocery shelves;the rapid spread of the virus and death among workers in meat-packing industries;the closure of slaughterhouses leading to hogs, cows, and other animals raised for food being \"euthanized\";and claims about covid emerging from the meat of exotic animals sold in Asian \"wet\" markets. Coverage of \"wild\" animals in urban areas and temporary reduction in carbon emissions lead to speculations on whether these are signs of hope for a healthier planet (among the sickness of covid) and for a potential reversal of the environmental damage of global warming and climate change.1 More time with pets and connections with nonhuman kin enabled by greater leisure time or forced isolation are seen as possibilities that we can suture the sense of alienation (with each other and the natural world) that modernity engenders.2 Stories about animals in slaughterhouses and in farms, fields, and factories raised as part of the industrial production of food do not occupy the same representational space in news or popular accounts;even less do citings about the scarcity of meat in stores and work and death in meat processing plants occur alongside narratives of animal sightings. Numerous reports warn us about the rising incidence of zoonotic diseases, seen for instance in sars and Ebola, and our growing vulnerability in the face of animal-to-human virus transmissions.7 Global demand for meat has increased 260 percent in the last fifty years, and illegal wildlife trade has increased exponentially.8 Unfettered capitalism has led to covid, and the links between the two are steadfast and explicit.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"599 - 626"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animal Sightings and Citings under COVID Capitalism: Beyond Liberal Sentimentalism\",\"authors\":\"Sushmita Chatterjee, K. Asher\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fem.2021.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONVERSATIONS, NEWS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS about COVID are saturated with stories about animals: accounts of \\\"wild\\\" animals emerging and seen in cities around the world, an increase in the number of bird watchers, an astronomical rise in webcam views of wildlife, videos of zoo animals walking through their exhibition halls or through art museums and galleries. Animals are also getting adopted and fostered at an unprecedented rate, and pets appear on virtual meetings as never before. Since the World Health Organization's (who) official announcement of the coronavirus pandemic in March 2020, news reports related to meat are differently but equally prevalent: the disappearance of chicken and other meat from grocery shelves;the rapid spread of the virus and death among workers in meat-packing industries;the closure of slaughterhouses leading to hogs, cows, and other animals raised for food being \\\"euthanized\\\";and claims about covid emerging from the meat of exotic animals sold in Asian \\\"wet\\\" markets. Coverage of \\\"wild\\\" animals in urban areas and temporary reduction in carbon emissions lead to speculations on whether these are signs of hope for a healthier planet (among the sickness of covid) and for a potential reversal of the environmental damage of global warming and climate change.1 More time with pets and connections with nonhuman kin enabled by greater leisure time or forced isolation are seen as possibilities that we can suture the sense of alienation (with each other and the natural world) that modernity engenders.2 Stories about animals in slaughterhouses and in farms, fields, and factories raised as part of the industrial production of food do not occupy the same representational space in news or popular accounts;even less do citings about the scarcity of meat in stores and work and death in meat processing plants occur alongside narratives of animal sightings. Numerous reports warn us about the rising incidence of zoonotic diseases, seen for instance in sars and Ebola, and our growing vulnerability in the face of animal-to-human virus transmissions.7 Global demand for meat has increased 260 percent in the last fifty years, and illegal wildlife trade has increased exponentially.8 Unfettered capitalism has led to covid, and the links between the two are steadfast and explicit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"599 - 626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2021.0027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2021.0027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于COVID的对话、新闻和社交媒体账户充斥着关于动物的故事:关于世界各地城市出现和看到的“野生”动物的报道,观鸟者数量的增加,野生动物的网络摄像头视图的天文数字增长,动物园动物走过展厅或艺术博物馆和画廊的视频。动物也以前所未有的速度被收养和抚养,宠物也以前所未有的方式出现在虚拟会议上。自世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于2020年3月正式宣布冠状病毒大流行以来,与肉类有关的新闻报道有所不同,但同样普遍:食品杂货店货架上的鸡肉和其他肉类消失;病毒迅速传播,肉类包装行业工人死亡;屠宰场关闭,导致猪、牛和其他食用动物被“安乐死”;亚洲“湿”市场上出售的外来动物的肉出现了有关新冠病毒的说法。城市地区“野生”动物的覆盖范围和碳排放的暂时减少,引发了人们的猜测:这些是否预示着(在新冠肺炎疫情中)地球将变得更健康,以及全球变暖和气候变化对环境造成的破坏可能得到逆转更多的时间与宠物在一起,更多的时间与非人类亲属在一起,这些都是由于更多的闲暇时间或被迫的隔离而得以实现的,这些都被视为我们可以缝合现代性所产生的(与彼此以及与自然世界的)疏离感的可能性关于屠宰场、农场、田野和工厂里的动物的故事,作为食品工业生产的一部分,在新闻或大众报道中没有占据相同的代表性空间;关于商店里肉类短缺、肉类加工厂的工作和死亡的引用,更少出现在动物目击的叙述中。许多报告警告我们,人畜共患疾病(例如sars和埃博拉)的发病率正在上升,我们在动物向人类传播病毒方面越来越脆弱在过去的50年里,全球对肉类的需求增长了260%,非法野生动物贸易呈指数级增长不受约束的资本主义导致了新冠疫情,两者之间的联系是坚定而明确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Animal Sightings and Citings under COVID Capitalism: Beyond Liberal Sentimentalism
CONVERSATIONS, NEWS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS about COVID are saturated with stories about animals: accounts of "wild" animals emerging and seen in cities around the world, an increase in the number of bird watchers, an astronomical rise in webcam views of wildlife, videos of zoo animals walking through their exhibition halls or through art museums and galleries. Animals are also getting adopted and fostered at an unprecedented rate, and pets appear on virtual meetings as never before. Since the World Health Organization's (who) official announcement of the coronavirus pandemic in March 2020, news reports related to meat are differently but equally prevalent: the disappearance of chicken and other meat from grocery shelves;the rapid spread of the virus and death among workers in meat-packing industries;the closure of slaughterhouses leading to hogs, cows, and other animals raised for food being "euthanized";and claims about covid emerging from the meat of exotic animals sold in Asian "wet" markets. Coverage of "wild" animals in urban areas and temporary reduction in carbon emissions lead to speculations on whether these are signs of hope for a healthier planet (among the sickness of covid) and for a potential reversal of the environmental damage of global warming and climate change.1 More time with pets and connections with nonhuman kin enabled by greater leisure time or forced isolation are seen as possibilities that we can suture the sense of alienation (with each other and the natural world) that modernity engenders.2 Stories about animals in slaughterhouses and in farms, fields, and factories raised as part of the industrial production of food do not occupy the same representational space in news or popular accounts;even less do citings about the scarcity of meat in stores and work and death in meat processing plants occur alongside narratives of animal sightings. Numerous reports warn us about the rising incidence of zoonotic diseases, seen for instance in sars and Ebola, and our growing vulnerability in the face of animal-to-human virus transmissions.7 Global demand for meat has increased 260 percent in the last fifty years, and illegal wildlife trade has increased exponentially.8 Unfettered capitalism has led to covid, and the links between the two are steadfast and explicit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Pleasures of the Hunt / We Must Be Creatures: Toward an Ecofeminist Hunting Ethic What Hungers Call Us Home? Engaging Autotheory Through Food Legal Landscapes Post-Roe: Shifts in Antiabortion Violence and Implications of the face Act Oasis by Necessity: The Post-Dobbs Landscape in Central Illinois "Brutality and its aftermath": Autotheoretical Engagements with Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1