评估系统使用探地雷达和螺旋钻测量来确定阿拉斯加中部三个露天地点的活动区域

IF 1.5 1区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1080/00934690.2023.2248572
Briana N. Doering, K. Hladek, M. Herron, Joshua D. Reuther, Julie Esdale, Charles E. Holmes, Gerad M. Smith
{"title":"评估系统使用探地雷达和螺旋钻测量来确定阿拉斯加中部三个露天地点的活动区域","authors":"Briana N. Doering, K. Hladek, M. Herron, Joshua D. Reuther, Julie Esdale, Charles E. Holmes, Gerad M. Smith","doi":"10.1080/00934690.2023.2248572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores various testing techniques’ ability to identify activity areas across deeply stratified, open air archaeological sites. To determine the efficacy of different site testing techniques, a systematic ground penetrating radar and auger survey was completed at three sites in central Alaska: Swan Point, Bachner, and Niidhaayh Na’. The results show that both ground penetrating radar and auger survey can indicate subsurface geology, important for sites without exposed vertical deposits. Additionally, systematic auger surveys can be used to identify activity areas at large sites and in components up to 4 m below surface prior to full-scale excavation. This can help archaeologists identify earlier archaeological components and target specific areas that are directly related to their research questions while preserving the rest of the site for future investigations. Compared to traditional shovel testing, auger surveys provide a consistent, efficient, and rigorous method for assessing buried cultural remains.","PeriodicalId":47452,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":"48 1","pages":"518 - 533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Systematic Use of Ground Penetrating Radar and Auger Surveys to Determine Activity Areas at Three Open Air Sites in Central Alaska\",\"authors\":\"Briana N. Doering, K. Hladek, M. Herron, Joshua D. Reuther, Julie Esdale, Charles E. Holmes, Gerad M. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00934690.2023.2248572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explores various testing techniques’ ability to identify activity areas across deeply stratified, open air archaeological sites. To determine the efficacy of different site testing techniques, a systematic ground penetrating radar and auger survey was completed at three sites in central Alaska: Swan Point, Bachner, and Niidhaayh Na’. The results show that both ground penetrating radar and auger survey can indicate subsurface geology, important for sites without exposed vertical deposits. Additionally, systematic auger surveys can be used to identify activity areas at large sites and in components up to 4 m below surface prior to full-scale excavation. This can help archaeologists identify earlier archaeological components and target specific areas that are directly related to their research questions while preserving the rest of the site for future investigations. Compared to traditional shovel testing, auger surveys provide a consistent, efficient, and rigorous method for assessing buried cultural remains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"518 - 533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2023.2248572\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2023.2248572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究探讨了各种测试技术在深层分层露天考古遗址中识别活动区域的能力。为了确定不同地点测试技术的有效性,在阿拉斯加中部的三个地点:Swan Point、Bachner和Niidhaayh Na '完成了系统的探地雷达和螺旋钻调查。结果表明,探地雷达和螺旋钻测量都可以指示地下地质,这对没有暴露的垂直矿床的地点很重要。此外,在全面挖掘之前,系统的螺旋钻测量可用于确定大型场地和地表以下4米的部件的活动区域。这可以帮助考古学家识别早期的考古成分,并针对与他们的研究问题直接相关的特定区域,同时保留遗址的其余部分以供未来调查。与传统的铲式测试相比,螺旋钻调查提供了一种一致、高效、严格的方法来评估埋藏的文化遗迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Systematic Use of Ground Penetrating Radar and Auger Surveys to Determine Activity Areas at Three Open Air Sites in Central Alaska
ABSTRACT This study explores various testing techniques’ ability to identify activity areas across deeply stratified, open air archaeological sites. To determine the efficacy of different site testing techniques, a systematic ground penetrating radar and auger survey was completed at three sites in central Alaska: Swan Point, Bachner, and Niidhaayh Na’. The results show that both ground penetrating radar and auger survey can indicate subsurface geology, important for sites without exposed vertical deposits. Additionally, systematic auger surveys can be used to identify activity areas at large sites and in components up to 4 m below surface prior to full-scale excavation. This can help archaeologists identify earlier archaeological components and target specific areas that are directly related to their research questions while preserving the rest of the site for future investigations. Compared to traditional shovel testing, auger surveys provide a consistent, efficient, and rigorous method for assessing buried cultural remains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Field Archaeology is an international, refereed journal serving the interests of archaeologists, anthropologists, historians, scientists, and others concerned with the recovery and interpretation of archaeological data. Its scope is worldwide and is not confined to any particular time period. Contributions in English are welcomed from all countries.
期刊最新文献
Reproducibility and Archaeological Practice in the Journal of Field Archaeology The High-Resolution Archaeology of Shared Courtyards at Old Dongola (14th-16th Century a.d., Sudan): an Intensive Approach to Domestic Open Spaces. Geolocation of Old Photographs and Rephotography in the Field: Contribution to a New Understanding of the al-ʿŪla Oasis in the Early 20th Century a.d. Metal Detecting in the Wake of 16th Century a.d. Spanish Expeditions Detection of Hunting Pits using Airborne Laser Scanning and Deep Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1