{"title":"引入争论:政党作为制度的批判视角","authors":"J. Hejny, Adam Hilton","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Scholars working in the analytic traditions of Historical Institutionalism (HI) and American Political Development (APD) have increasingly turned their attention to the role of political parties in shaping politics across time and space. However, despite recent advances, historically-minded social scientists continue to juxtapose institutions and contentious forms of politics. We argue that such a dichotomy is unwarranted. Specifically, we assert that because of their place and function in the modern democratic polity, political parties are fundamentally and inextricably contentious institutions.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"102 1","pages":"161 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing contention in: a critical perspective on political parties as institutions\",\"authors\":\"J. Hejny, Adam Hilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Scholars working in the analytic traditions of Historical Institutionalism (HI) and American Political Development (APD) have increasingly turned their attention to the role of political parties in shaping politics across time and space. However, despite recent advances, historically-minded social scientists continue to juxtapose institutions and contentious forms of politics. We argue that such a dichotomy is unwarranted. Specifically, we assert that because of their place and function in the modern democratic polity, political parties are fundamentally and inextricably contentious institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bringing contention in: a critical perspective on political parties as institutions
Abstract Scholars working in the analytic traditions of Historical Institutionalism (HI) and American Political Development (APD) have increasingly turned their attention to the role of political parties in shaping politics across time and space. However, despite recent advances, historically-minded social scientists continue to juxtapose institutions and contentious forms of politics. We argue that such a dichotomy is unwarranted. Specifically, we assert that because of their place and function in the modern democratic polity, political parties are fundamentally and inextricably contentious institutions.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.