Geschichtswissenschaft之间、民間傳說‚语言学. "中德文学主流社会学(1895 / 1930)

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR Pub Date : 2021-11-09 DOI:10.1515/iasl-2021-0021
M. Benz
{"title":"Geschichtswissenschaft之间、民間傳說‚语言学. \"中德文学主流社会学(1895 / 1930)","authors":"M. Benz","doi":"10.1515/iasl-2021-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract According to widespread prejudice, it was only about 1900 that the influence of society on literature became an important scholarly issue. On the contrary, it will be demonstrated that, since the beginnings of its literary history, the literature of the Middle Ages has been discussed within its social context. At the same time, it will be shown in this article that between 1895 and 1930 some exceptional figures, in particular, Paul Kluckhohn and Edward Schröder, though representing the intellectual atmosphere of their time, nonetheless contributed to the development of a method of correlating medieval society and literature that until today remains of more than historical interest.","PeriodicalId":42506,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR","volume":"46 1","pages":"378 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zwischen Geschichtswissenschaft, Volkskunde und ‚Philologie‘. Zur Protosoziologie der mittelhochdeutschen Literatur (1895–1930)\",\"authors\":\"M. Benz\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iasl-2021-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract According to widespread prejudice, it was only about 1900 that the influence of society on literature became an important scholarly issue. On the contrary, it will be demonstrated that, since the beginnings of its literary history, the literature of the Middle Ages has been discussed within its social context. At the same time, it will be shown in this article that between 1895 and 1930 some exceptional figures, in particular, Paul Kluckhohn and Edward Schröder, though representing the intellectual atmosphere of their time, nonetheless contributed to the development of a method of correlating medieval society and literature that until today remains of more than historical interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"378 - 392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iasl-2021-0021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iasl-2021-0021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据普遍的偏见,直到1900年左右,社会对文学的影响才成为一个重要的学术问题。相反,它将证明,自其文学史的开始,中世纪文学一直在其社会背景下进行讨论。与此同时,本文将显示,在1895年至1930年之间,一些杰出的人物,特别是保罗·克鲁克霍恩和爱德华Schröder,虽然代表了他们那个时代的知识氛围,但仍然为将中世纪社会与文学联系起来的方法的发展做出了贡献,直到今天,这种方法仍然不仅仅具有历史意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zwischen Geschichtswissenschaft, Volkskunde und ‚Philologie‘. Zur Protosoziologie der mittelhochdeutschen Literatur (1895–1930)
Abstract According to widespread prejudice, it was only about 1900 that the influence of society on literature became an important scholarly issue. On the contrary, it will be demonstrated that, since the beginnings of its literary history, the literature of the Middle Ages has been discussed within its social context. At the same time, it will be shown in this article that between 1895 and 1930 some exceptional figures, in particular, Paul Kluckhohn and Edward Schröder, though representing the intellectual atmosphere of their time, nonetheless contributed to the development of a method of correlating medieval society and literature that until today remains of more than historical interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Ökonomien des Selbst Political and Unpolitical Germany: Max Weber and Thomas Mann Literatur im Ministerium des Innern. „Ich habe keine Lust, mich Heiligabend mit diesen Spießern rumzuärgern!“ Mit Druckerzeugnissen Druck erzeugen ‒
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1