Q3 Social Sciences Sociologija i Prostor Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI:10.5673/sip.60.3.7
{"title":"Kako studenti i studentice biraju studije? Kvalitativno istraživanje motivacijskih, rodnih i kontekstualnih čimbenika odabira","authors":"","doi":"10.5673/sip.60.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the paper was to investigate, using the qualitative method, how students understand their own process of choosing a study course at the higher education level. This study was grounded in the Eccles et al.’s situated expectancy-value theory. The research questions were the following: 1) What do students recognize as the main reasons for their own course choice decision?, 2) How do they perceive the role of important others in their decision to choose a course?, and 3) How do they understand the relationship between gender stereotypes about studies and occupations, and their own course choice? A semi-structured interview was conducted with 44 first-year university students (22 young men and 22 young women). The thematic analysis of the interviews showed that motivational beliefs, important others and gender stereotypes played different roles in the choice of a study course. Subjective values, especially interest, perceived usefulness and cost of effort are recognized as important motivational influences. Parents, teachers, and especially friends influenced course choices with their advice, information and support. The analysis of gender dimension showed the prevalence of a perception that gender stereotypes did not influence one’s own study course choice. However, when the influence of gender stereotypes was recognized, it was in line with the expectations: students of gender-typical courses stated that they avoided gender non-stereotyped professional choices, while a female student of mechanical engineering described the importance of rejecting stereotypes for her decision to study a typically male course. Practical implications aiming at expanding the spectrum of possible course choices include providing additional information for pupils about study courses and raising their awareness about the influence of gender stereotypes on educational choices.","PeriodicalId":39267,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija i Prostor","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija i Prostor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.60.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是调查,使用定性的方法,学生如何理解自己在高等教育阶段选择学习课程的过程。本研究以埃克尔斯等人的情境期望值理论为基础。研究问题如下:1)学生们认为自己选择课程的主要原因是什么?2)在他们选择课程的决定中,他们如何看待重要的其他人的作用?3)他们如何理解关于学习和职业的性别刻板印象与他们自己的课程选择之间的关系?对44名大学一年级学生(22名年轻男性和22名年轻女性)进行了半结构化访谈。访谈的主题分析表明,动机信念、重要他人和性别刻板印象在学习课程的选择中发挥了不同的作用。主观价值,特别是兴趣、感知有用性和努力成本被认为是重要的动机影响因素。父母、老师,尤其是朋友通过他们的建议、信息和支持影响了课程的选择。性别维度的分析显示,普遍认为性别刻板印象不影响自己的学习课程选择。然而,当认识到性别刻板印象的影响时,它符合预期:性别典型课程的学生表示,他们避免了性别非刻板印象的专业选择,而机械工程专业的一名女学生描述了拒绝刻板印象对她决定学习典型的男性课程的重要性。旨在扩大可能的课程选择范围的实际影响包括为学生提供关于学习课程的额外信息,并提高他们对性别陈规定型观念对教育选择的影响的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kako studenti i studentice biraju studije? Kvalitativno istraživanje motivacijskih, rodnih i kontekstualnih čimbenika odabira
The goal of the paper was to investigate, using the qualitative method, how students understand their own process of choosing a study course at the higher education level. This study was grounded in the Eccles et al.’s situated expectancy-value theory. The research questions were the following: 1) What do students recognize as the main reasons for their own course choice decision?, 2) How do they perceive the role of important others in their decision to choose a course?, and 3) How do they understand the relationship between gender stereotypes about studies and occupations, and their own course choice? A semi-structured interview was conducted with 44 first-year university students (22 young men and 22 young women). The thematic analysis of the interviews showed that motivational beliefs, important others and gender stereotypes played different roles in the choice of a study course. Subjective values, especially interest, perceived usefulness and cost of effort are recognized as important motivational influences. Parents, teachers, and especially friends influenced course choices with their advice, information and support. The analysis of gender dimension showed the prevalence of a perception that gender stereotypes did not influence one’s own study course choice. However, when the influence of gender stereotypes was recognized, it was in line with the expectations: students of gender-typical courses stated that they avoided gender non-stereotyped professional choices, while a female student of mechanical engineering described the importance of rejecting stereotypes for her decision to study a typically male course. Practical implications aiming at expanding the spectrum of possible course choices include providing additional information for pupils about study courses and raising their awareness about the influence of gender stereotypes on educational choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologija i Prostor
Sociologija i Prostor Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
When Worlds Collide: Sociality Between Physical and Cyberspace during the COVID-19 Pandemic Doprinos civilnog društva kvaliteti života osoba u starijoj životnoj dobi u gradu Zagrebu „Lijepo je doći tu na par dana, ali je živjeti teško…“ – razvojni potencijali i prepreke ruralnih naselja Gorskoga kotara i sjevernodalmatinskih otoka iz perspektive stanovnika Networking Through Persistence: Case Study on the Position and Development of the Clubture Network Slobodno vrijeme i međukulturna osjetljivost studenata učiteljskih studija
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1