跨学科周围神经创伤护理的患者观点

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1177/22925503231184265
Aidan Pye, Suzy Stanton, Sean Bristol, Kristine M Chapman, Michael J Berger
{"title":"跨学科周围神经创伤护理的患者观点","authors":"Aidan Pye, Suzy Stanton, Sean Bristol, Kristine M Chapman, Michael J Berger","doi":"10.1177/22925503231184265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a complex, debilitating condition that is increasingly being treated in interdisciplinary clinics. Patients see peripheral nerve surgeons, neurologists, physiatrists, and electrodiagnostic technicians in a single encounter. No studies have evaluated patient experience within this unique interdisciplinary care model. This study aims to assess patients' perceptions of the effectiveness of delivery of care and health care information in an interdisciplinary PNI clinic. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted using a 23-question survey that was by a lived-experience partner (an individual who had a brachial plexus injury) in research who helped design the survey. Participants attended an interdisciplinary clinic for PNI 1-2 days prior to taking the survey. The survey included 5-point Likert scales for measuring patient understanding and qualitative questions that were categorized into themes, using conventional content analysis. <b>Results:</b> Of the 20 participants, 65% were male, 35% were female and the mean age was 42.6 ± 17.8. Median scores of 4 were obtained for the patient understanding of the testing purposes, test results, nerve recovery after PNI, and surgical decision-making (full understanding = 5). On improving the clinical experience, 58% indicated no improvements were necessary, while 17% indicated the clinic felt rushed or overwhelming. When asked about positive aspects of their clinical experience, 64% appreciated the team approach to care, 27% valued the informative nature of the clinic, and 27% appreciated the progress they felt when providers at the clinic performed nerve testing. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results demonstrate that patients with PNI have overall positive perceptions of the delivery of care and information in an interdisciplinary PNI clinic. These results provide new insight into how interdisciplinary care may be beneficial to PNI patients based on the perceived effectiveness of knowledge translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perspectives on Interdisciplinary Peripheral Nerve Trauma Care.\",\"authors\":\"Aidan Pye, Suzy Stanton, Sean Bristol, Kristine M Chapman, Michael J Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22925503231184265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a complex, debilitating condition that is increasingly being treated in interdisciplinary clinics. Patients see peripheral nerve surgeons, neurologists, physiatrists, and electrodiagnostic technicians in a single encounter. No studies have evaluated patient experience within this unique interdisciplinary care model. This study aims to assess patients' perceptions of the effectiveness of delivery of care and health care information in an interdisciplinary PNI clinic. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted using a 23-question survey that was by a lived-experience partner (an individual who had a brachial plexus injury) in research who helped design the survey. Participants attended an interdisciplinary clinic for PNI 1-2 days prior to taking the survey. The survey included 5-point Likert scales for measuring patient understanding and qualitative questions that were categorized into themes, using conventional content analysis. <b>Results:</b> Of the 20 participants, 65% were male, 35% were female and the mean age was 42.6 ± 17.8. Median scores of 4 were obtained for the patient understanding of the testing purposes, test results, nerve recovery after PNI, and surgical decision-making (full understanding = 5). On improving the clinical experience, 58% indicated no improvements were necessary, while 17% indicated the clinic felt rushed or overwhelming. When asked about positive aspects of their clinical experience, 64% appreciated the team approach to care, 27% valued the informative nature of the clinic, and 27% appreciated the progress they felt when providers at the clinic performed nerve testing. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results demonstrate that patients with PNI have overall positive perceptions of the delivery of care and information in an interdisciplinary PNI clinic. These results provide new insight into how interdisciplinary care may be beneficial to PNI patients based on the perceived effectiveness of knowledge translation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"78-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770745/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231184265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231184265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:周围神经损伤(PNI)是一种复杂的,使人衰弱的疾病,越来越多地被跨学科诊所治疗。患者可以在一次会面中看到周围神经外科医生、神经科医生、物理医生和电诊断技术人员。没有研究在这种独特的跨学科护理模式中评估患者体验。本研究旨在评估患者对跨学科PNI诊所提供护理和卫生保健信息的有效性的看法。方法:采用横断面混合方法研究,采用23个问题的调查,由一位帮助设计调查的有实际经验的研究伙伴(有臂丛损伤的个体)进行调查。参与者在调查前1-2天参加了PNI的跨学科诊所。该调查包括5点李克特量表,用于测量患者的理解和定性问题,这些问题被分类为主题,使用传统的内容分析。结果:20例患者中,男性占65%,女性占35%,平均年龄42.6±17.8岁。患者对检测目的、检测结果、PNI术后神经恢复和手术决策的理解中位数为4分(完全理解= 5分)。在改善临床体验方面,58%的人表示没有必要改善,而17%的人表示诊所感到匆忙或不堪重负。当被问及他们临床经验的积极方面时,64%的人赞赏团队护理方法,27%的人重视诊所的信息性,27%的人赞赏诊所提供者进行神经测试时他们感受到的进步。结论:结果表明,PNI患者对跨学科PNI诊所提供的护理和信息总体上持积极态度。这些结果为跨学科护理如何基于知识转化的感知有效性对PNI患者有益提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Perspectives on Interdisciplinary Peripheral Nerve Trauma Care.

Introduction: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a complex, debilitating condition that is increasingly being treated in interdisciplinary clinics. Patients see peripheral nerve surgeons, neurologists, physiatrists, and electrodiagnostic technicians in a single encounter. No studies have evaluated patient experience within this unique interdisciplinary care model. This study aims to assess patients' perceptions of the effectiveness of delivery of care and health care information in an interdisciplinary PNI clinic. Methods: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted using a 23-question survey that was by a lived-experience partner (an individual who had a brachial plexus injury) in research who helped design the survey. Participants attended an interdisciplinary clinic for PNI 1-2 days prior to taking the survey. The survey included 5-point Likert scales for measuring patient understanding and qualitative questions that were categorized into themes, using conventional content analysis. Results: Of the 20 participants, 65% were male, 35% were female and the mean age was 42.6 ± 17.8. Median scores of 4 were obtained for the patient understanding of the testing purposes, test results, nerve recovery after PNI, and surgical decision-making (full understanding = 5). On improving the clinical experience, 58% indicated no improvements were necessary, while 17% indicated the clinic felt rushed or overwhelming. When asked about positive aspects of their clinical experience, 64% appreciated the team approach to care, 27% valued the informative nature of the clinic, and 27% appreciated the progress they felt when providers at the clinic performed nerve testing. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that patients with PNI have overall positive perceptions of the delivery of care and information in an interdisciplinary PNI clinic. These results provide new insight into how interdisciplinary care may be beneficial to PNI patients based on the perceived effectiveness of knowledge translation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
A 5-Year Analysis of Saudi Arabian Applications to Plastic Surgery Residency Training in Canada. Rectovaginal Fistula Repair Following Vaginoplasty in Transgender Females: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques. Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada. Safety of Cefazolin Perioperative Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients With Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Chart Review. Long-Term Opioid Use After Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: Incidence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1