{"title":"《马尔菲公爵夫人》中的危险对话","authors":"John Gillies","doi":"10.4000/sillagescritiques.6709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proposition of this essay is that conversation exists as a theme in its own right in The Duchess of Malfi. It is clear that Webster borrowed from The Civil Conversation (1586), as Steffano Guazzo’s book was known in English translation. As in Guazzo, honest conversation, in Webster's play, has a civil rather than courtly character, and as such the conversation theme corresponds with an antithesis that has been noted by John L. Selzer between merit and degree. But the conversation of Webster’s meritorious characters is entangled with dishonesty in ways that Guazzo would not have countenanced. The result is a moral ambiguity which is difficult to square with virtue ethics, and which calls for a reading in terms of the totalitarian contexts of the revenge play and the Tacitean history play then gaining ascendancy in Jacobean England. Ironically the Duchess is restored to her honesty by conversing with her murderer at the climax of the play.","PeriodicalId":56234,"journal":{"name":"Sillages Critiques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dangerous Conversations in The Duchess of Malfi\",\"authors\":\"John Gillies\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/sillagescritiques.6709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The proposition of this essay is that conversation exists as a theme in its own right in The Duchess of Malfi. It is clear that Webster borrowed from The Civil Conversation (1586), as Steffano Guazzo’s book was known in English translation. As in Guazzo, honest conversation, in Webster's play, has a civil rather than courtly character, and as such the conversation theme corresponds with an antithesis that has been noted by John L. Selzer between merit and degree. But the conversation of Webster’s meritorious characters is entangled with dishonesty in ways that Guazzo would not have countenanced. The result is a moral ambiguity which is difficult to square with virtue ethics, and which calls for a reading in terms of the totalitarian contexts of the revenge play and the Tacitean history play then gaining ascendancy in Jacobean England. Ironically the Duchess is restored to her honesty by conversing with her murderer at the climax of the play.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sillages Critiques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sillages Critiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/sillagescritiques.6709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sillages Critiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/sillagescritiques.6709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章的命题是,在《马尔菲公爵夫人》中,对话本身就是一个主题。很明显,韦伯斯特借用了Steffano Guazzo这本书的英译本《公民对话》(1586)。正如在《瓜佐》中一样,韦伯斯特的戏剧中,诚实的谈话具有一种文明而不是宫廷的特征,因此,谈话的主题与约翰·l·塞尔泽(John L. Selzer)所指出的功绩与学位之间的对立相对应。但是,韦伯斯特书中有功绩的人物的对话与不诚实的行为纠缠在一起,这是瓜佐不会赞同的。其结果是道德上的模棱两可,难以与美德伦理相一致,这就需要在复仇剧和塔西特历史剧的极权主义背景下进行解读,然后在詹姆斯比一世时期的英格兰占据主导地位。具有讽刺意味的是,公爵夫人通过与谋杀她的人交谈,在戏剧的高潮部分恢复了她的诚实。
The proposition of this essay is that conversation exists as a theme in its own right in The Duchess of Malfi. It is clear that Webster borrowed from The Civil Conversation (1586), as Steffano Guazzo’s book was known in English translation. As in Guazzo, honest conversation, in Webster's play, has a civil rather than courtly character, and as such the conversation theme corresponds with an antithesis that has been noted by John L. Selzer between merit and degree. But the conversation of Webster’s meritorious characters is entangled with dishonesty in ways that Guazzo would not have countenanced. The result is a moral ambiguity which is difficult to square with virtue ethics, and which calls for a reading in terms of the totalitarian contexts of the revenge play and the Tacitean history play then gaining ascendancy in Jacobean England. Ironically the Duchess is restored to her honesty by conversing with her murderer at the climax of the play.