类风湿性关节炎的四种血清学标志物分析:与患者关节外表现和亲属关节痛的关系

Flávia R. Nass , Thelma L. Skare , Isabela Goeldner , Renato Nisihara , Iara T. Messias‐Reason , Shirley R.R. Utiyama
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎的四种血清学标志物分析:与患者关节外表现和亲属关节痛的关系","authors":"Flávia R. Nass ,&nbsp;Thelma L. Skare ,&nbsp;Isabela Goeldner ,&nbsp;Renato Nisihara ,&nbsp;Iara T. Messias‐Reason ,&nbsp;Shirley R.R. Utiyama","doi":"10.1016/j.rbr.2015.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the frequency of four serum biomarkers in RA patients and their relatives and identify possible associations with clinical findings of the disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a transversal analytical study. Anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP), anti‐mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti‐MCV) and IgA‐rheumatoid factor (RF) were determined by ELISA and IgM‐RF by latex agglutination in 210 RA patients, 198 relatives and 92 healthy controls from Southern Brazil. Clinical and demographic data were obtained through charts review and questionnaires.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A higher positivity for all antibodies was observed in RA patients when compared to relatives and controls (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). IgA‐RF was more frequent in relatives compared to controls (14.6% vs. 5.4%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.98; 95%<span>CI</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.11‐7.98) whereas anti‐CCP was the most common biomarker among RA patients (75.6%). Concomitant positivity for the four biomarkers was more common in patients (46.2%, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). Relatives and controls were mostly positive for just one biomarker (20.2%, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001 and 15.2%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.016, respectively). No association was observed between the number of positive biomarkers and age of disease onset, functional class or tobacco exposure. In seronegative patients predominate absence of extra articular manifestations (EAMs) (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01; OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.25; CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.16‐10.66). Arthralgia was present in positive relatives, regardless the type of biomarker.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A higher number of biomarkers was present in RA patients with EAMs. Positivity of biomarkers was related to arthralgia in relatives. These findings reinforce the link between distinct biomarkers and the pathophysiologic mechanisms of AR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2015.11.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análise de quatro marcadores sorológicos na artrite reumatoide: associação com manifestações extra‐articulares no paciente e artralgia em familiares\",\"authors\":\"Flávia R. Nass ,&nbsp;Thelma L. Skare ,&nbsp;Isabela Goeldner ,&nbsp;Renato Nisihara ,&nbsp;Iara T. Messias‐Reason ,&nbsp;Shirley R.R. Utiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbr.2015.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the frequency of four serum biomarkers in RA patients and their relatives and identify possible associations with clinical findings of the disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a transversal analytical study. Anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP), anti‐mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti‐MCV) and IgA‐rheumatoid factor (RF) were determined by ELISA and IgM‐RF by latex agglutination in 210 RA patients, 198 relatives and 92 healthy controls from Southern Brazil. Clinical and demographic data were obtained through charts review and questionnaires.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A higher positivity for all antibodies was observed in RA patients when compared to relatives and controls (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). IgA‐RF was more frequent in relatives compared to controls (14.6% vs. 5.4%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.98; 95%<span>CI</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.11‐7.98) whereas anti‐CCP was the most common biomarker among RA patients (75.6%). Concomitant positivity for the four biomarkers was more common in patients (46.2%, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). Relatives and controls were mostly positive for just one biomarker (20.2%, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001 and 15.2%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.016, respectively). No association was observed between the number of positive biomarkers and age of disease onset, functional class or tobacco exposure. In seronegative patients predominate absence of extra articular manifestations (EAMs) (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01; OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.25; CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.16‐10.66). Arthralgia was present in positive relatives, regardless the type of biomarker.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A higher number of biomarkers was present in RA patients with EAMs. Positivity of biomarkers was related to arthralgia in relatives. These findings reinforce the link between distinct biomarkers and the pathophysiologic mechanisms of AR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2015.11.002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416000310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的评估四种血清生物标志物在RA患者及其亲属中的频率,并确定其与RA临床表现的可能关联。方法采用横向分析研究。采用ELISA和胶乳凝集法检测了210例RA患者、198例亲属和92例健康对照者的抗环瓜氨酸肽(Anti - CCP)、抗突变瓜氨酸蛋白(Anti - MCV)和IgA -类风湿因子(RF)水平。临床和人口统计数据通过图表审查和问卷调查获得。结果RA患者所有抗体的阳性率均高于亲属和对照组(p <0.0001)。与对照组相比,IgA‐RF在亲属中更常见(14.6% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.03, OR = 2.98;95%CI = 1.11‐7.98),而抗CCP是RA患者中最常见的生物标志物(75.6%)。这四种生物标志物的同时阳性在患者中更为常见(46.2%,p <0.0001)。亲属和对照组大多只有一种生物标志物呈阳性(20.2%,p <0.0001和15.2%,p = 0.016)。未观察到阳性生物标志物的数量与发病年龄、功能类别或烟草暴露之间的关联。血清阴性患者以无关节外表现(EAMs)为主(p = 0.01;或= 3.25;ci = 1.16‐10.66)。无论生物标志物类型如何,阳性亲属均存在关节痛。结论eam组RA患者存在较多的生物标志物。生物标志物阳性与亲属关节痛有关。这些发现加强了不同生物标志物与AR病理生理机制之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Análise de quatro marcadores sorológicos na artrite reumatoide: associação com manifestações extra‐articulares no paciente e artralgia em familiares

Objectives

To evaluate the frequency of four serum biomarkers in RA patients and their relatives and identify possible associations with clinical findings of the disease.

Methods

This was a transversal analytical study. Anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP), anti‐mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti‐MCV) and IgA‐rheumatoid factor (RF) were determined by ELISA and IgM‐RF by latex agglutination in 210 RA patients, 198 relatives and 92 healthy controls from Southern Brazil. Clinical and demographic data were obtained through charts review and questionnaires.

Results

A higher positivity for all antibodies was observed in RA patients when compared to relatives and controls (p < 0.0001). IgA‐RF was more frequent in relatives compared to controls (14.6% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.03, OR = 2.98; 95%CI = 1.11‐7.98) whereas anti‐CCP was the most common biomarker among RA patients (75.6%). Concomitant positivity for the four biomarkers was more common in patients (46.2%, p < 0.0001). Relatives and controls were mostly positive for just one biomarker (20.2%, p < 0.0001 and 15.2%, p = 0.016, respectively). No association was observed between the number of positive biomarkers and age of disease onset, functional class or tobacco exposure. In seronegative patients predominate absence of extra articular manifestations (EAMs) (p = 0.01; OR = 3.25; CI = 1.16‐10.66). Arthralgia was present in positive relatives, regardless the type of biomarker.

Conclusions

A higher number of biomarkers was present in RA patients with EAMs. Positivity of biomarkers was related to arthralgia in relatives. These findings reinforce the link between distinct biomarkers and the pathophysiologic mechanisms of AR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.82
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: RBR nasceu da necessidade de se criar um órgão oficial da SBR que pudesse divulgar a produção científica dos reumatologistas brasileiros. O primeiro número foi publicado em setembro de 1957. A partir do volume 18 (1978), passou a seis números, com periodicidade atual. A RBR, em sua trajetória, tem sido objeto de constantes mudanças, sempre visando ao seu aprimoramento e revitalização, tanto em sua apresentação como em seu conteúdo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome nefrótica como a primeira manifestação da esclerodermia sistêmica juvenil Presença de corpos riziformes em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil: relato de caso e revisão de literatura Redução da ativação e do recrutamento de linfócito CD3 com o uso de anticorpo anti‐TNF‐alfa: avaliação da resposta clínica e cintilográfica com 99mTc‐OKT3 em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil Doença de Lyme e artrite idiopática juvenil – Relato de caso clínico pediátrico Anormalidades esofágicas na esclerodermia localizada juvenil: associação com outras manifestações extracutâneas?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1