新西兰的肉类板,市场和屠宰季节:一个意想不到的后果的20世纪劳工史

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Labour History Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI:10.5263/labourhistory.114.0093
Bruce Curtis
{"title":"新西兰的肉类板,市场和屠宰季节:一个意想不到的后果的20世纪劳工史","authors":"Bruce Curtis","doi":"10.5263/labourhistory.114.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From its beginnings (in 1923), the New Zealand Meat Producers' Board, a statutory agency representing the collective interests of farmers, unintentionally and indirectly empowered meatworkers and their unions. This empowerment was instituted despite farmers and the Board being inherently hostile towards labour organisation. Through the Board, farmers exercised a self-interested collective control in local and international product markets that also benefited meatworkers in localised labour markets. The Board used its statutory powers to limit the scale and scope of meat companies and, by limiting their powers in the product markets of central concern to farmers, made these companies commensurately weak in labour markets. This analysis owes much to the insights of Fligstein and Fernandez (1988) regarding weak employers. Farmers' unintended empowerment of meatworkers as militant unionists was a remarkable irony given the often bitter antagonism between the two groups over industrial relations in New Zealand.","PeriodicalId":44167,"journal":{"name":"Labour History","volume":"1 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Zealand's meat board, markets and the killing season: A twentieth-century labour history of unintended consequences\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Curtis\",\"doi\":\"10.5263/labourhistory.114.0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From its beginnings (in 1923), the New Zealand Meat Producers' Board, a statutory agency representing the collective interests of farmers, unintentionally and indirectly empowered meatworkers and their unions. This empowerment was instituted despite farmers and the Board being inherently hostile towards labour organisation. Through the Board, farmers exercised a self-interested collective control in local and international product markets that also benefited meatworkers in localised labour markets. The Board used its statutory powers to limit the scale and scope of meat companies and, by limiting their powers in the product markets of central concern to farmers, made these companies commensurately weak in labour markets. This analysis owes much to the insights of Fligstein and Fernandez (1988) regarding weak employers. Farmers' unintended empowerment of meatworkers as militant unionists was a remarkable irony given the often bitter antagonism between the two groups over industrial relations in New Zealand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5263/labourhistory.114.0093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5263/labourhistory.114.0093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新西兰肉类生产者委员会是一个代表农民集体利益的法定机构,从1923年开始,它就无意中间接地赋予了肉类工人及其工会权力。尽管农民和委员会对劳工组织天生怀有敌意,但还是制定了这项授权。通过该委员会,农民对当地和国际产品市场实行了利己的集体控制,这也使当地劳动力市场的肉类工人受益。委员会利用其法定权力限制肉类公司的规模和范围,并通过限制它们在农民关心的产品市场上的权力,使这些公司在劳动力市场上相对薄弱。这一分析很大程度上归功于Fligstein和Fernandez(1988)关于弱势雇主的见解。农民无意中授权肉类工人成为激进的工会会员,这是一个显著的讽刺,因为这两个群体在新西兰的劳资关系上经常存在激烈的对立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Zealand's meat board, markets and the killing season: A twentieth-century labour history of unintended consequences
From its beginnings (in 1923), the New Zealand Meat Producers' Board, a statutory agency representing the collective interests of farmers, unintentionally and indirectly empowered meatworkers and their unions. This empowerment was instituted despite farmers and the Board being inherently hostile towards labour organisation. Through the Board, farmers exercised a self-interested collective control in local and international product markets that also benefited meatworkers in localised labour markets. The Board used its statutory powers to limit the scale and scope of meat companies and, by limiting their powers in the product markets of central concern to farmers, made these companies commensurately weak in labour markets. This analysis owes much to the insights of Fligstein and Fernandez (1988) regarding weak employers. Farmers' unintended empowerment of meatworkers as militant unionists was a remarkable irony given the often bitter antagonism between the two groups over industrial relations in New Zealand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour History
Labour History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The Fragility of Governmentality and Domination: The State, Carceral Labour and “(In)docile Resistance” in the Late Ottoman Empire “At Work, in Hospital, or in Gaol”: Women in British Guiana’s Jails, 1838–1917 Peter John Love (1947–2023) The Unreliable Witness: Clarence Dakin, ASIO, and Espionage British Colonialism and Prison Labour in Inter-War Palestine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1