开放存取存储库在技术领域的地位:来自OpenDOAR的见解

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Discovery and Delivery Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1108/idd-11-2022-0119
J. Wani, Taseef Ayub Sofi, Ishrat Ayub Sofi, S. A. Ganaie
{"title":"开放存取存储库在技术领域的地位:来自OpenDOAR的见解","authors":"J. Wani, Taseef Ayub Sofi, Ishrat Ayub Sofi, S. A. Ganaie","doi":"10.1108/idd-11-2022-0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nOpen-access repositories (OARs) are essential for openly disseminating intellectual knowledge on the internet and providing free access to it. The current study aims to evaluate the growth and development of OARs in the field of technology by investigating several characteristics such as coverage, OA policies, software type, content type, yearly growth, repository type and geographic contribution.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe directory of OARs acts as the source for data harvesting, which provides a quality-assured list of OARs across the globe.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study found that 125 nations contributed a total of 4,045 repositories in the field of research, with the USA leading the list with the most repositories. Maximum repositories were operated by institutions having multidisciplinary approaches. The DSpace and Eprints were the preferred software types for repositories. The preferred upload content by contributors was “research articles” and “electronic thesis and dissertations”.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study is limited to the subject area technology as listed in OpenDOAR; therefore, the results may differ in other subject areas.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe work can benefit researchers across disciplines and, interested researchers can take this study as a base for evaluating online repositories. Moreover, policymakers and repository managers could also get benefitted from this study.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study is the first of its kind, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to investigate the repositories of subject technology in the open-access platform.\n","PeriodicalId":43488,"journal":{"name":"Information Discovery and Delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The status of open access repositories in the field of technology: insights from OpenDOAR\",\"authors\":\"J. Wani, Taseef Ayub Sofi, Ishrat Ayub Sofi, S. A. Ganaie\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/idd-11-2022-0119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nOpen-access repositories (OARs) are essential for openly disseminating intellectual knowledge on the internet and providing free access to it. The current study aims to evaluate the growth and development of OARs in the field of technology by investigating several characteristics such as coverage, OA policies, software type, content type, yearly growth, repository type and geographic contribution.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe directory of OARs acts as the source for data harvesting, which provides a quality-assured list of OARs across the globe.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study found that 125 nations contributed a total of 4,045 repositories in the field of research, with the USA leading the list with the most repositories. Maximum repositories were operated by institutions having multidisciplinary approaches. The DSpace and Eprints were the preferred software types for repositories. The preferred upload content by contributors was “research articles” and “electronic thesis and dissertations”.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe study is limited to the subject area technology as listed in OpenDOAR; therefore, the results may differ in other subject areas.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe work can benefit researchers across disciplines and, interested researchers can take this study as a base for evaluating online repositories. Moreover, policymakers and repository managers could also get benefitted from this study.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe study is the first of its kind, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to investigate the repositories of subject technology in the open-access platform.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Discovery and Delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Discovery and Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/idd-11-2022-0119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Discovery and Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/idd-11-2022-0119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开放存取知识库(OARs)对于在互联网上公开传播知识并提供免费访问至关重要。本研究的目的是评估OARs在技术领域的成长和发展,通过调查几个特征,如覆盖范围、OA政策、软件类型、内容类型、年增长率、存储库类型和地理贡献。设计/方法/方法划桨目录作为数据收集的来源,它提供了一个有质量保证的全球划桨列表。研究发现,125个国家共提供了4045个研究领域的知识库,其中美国以最多的知识库位居榜首。最大的储存库由采用多学科方法的机构操作。DSpace和Eprints是存储库的首选软件类型。投稿者首选上传的内容是“研究文章”和“电子论文”。研究限制/影响本研究仅限于OpenDOAR中列出的主题领域技术;因此,结果可能在其他学科领域有所不同。实际意义这项工作可以使跨学科的研究人员受益,感兴趣的研究人员可以将这项研究作为评估在线知识库的基础。此外,政策制定者和储存库管理人员也可以从这项研究中受益。据作者所知,这项研究是第一次调查开放获取平台中的主题技术存储库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The status of open access repositories in the field of technology: insights from OpenDOAR
Purpose Open-access repositories (OARs) are essential for openly disseminating intellectual knowledge on the internet and providing free access to it. The current study aims to evaluate the growth and development of OARs in the field of technology by investigating several characteristics such as coverage, OA policies, software type, content type, yearly growth, repository type and geographic contribution. Design/methodology/approach The directory of OARs acts as the source for data harvesting, which provides a quality-assured list of OARs across the globe. Findings The study found that 125 nations contributed a total of 4,045 repositories in the field of research, with the USA leading the list with the most repositories. Maximum repositories were operated by institutions having multidisciplinary approaches. The DSpace and Eprints were the preferred software types for repositories. The preferred upload content by contributors was “research articles” and “electronic thesis and dissertations”. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to the subject area technology as listed in OpenDOAR; therefore, the results may differ in other subject areas. Practical implications The work can benefit researchers across disciplines and, interested researchers can take this study as a base for evaluating online repositories. Moreover, policymakers and repository managers could also get benefitted from this study. Originality/value The study is the first of its kind, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to investigate the repositories of subject technology in the open-access platform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Discovery and Delivery
Information Discovery and Delivery INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Information Discovery and Delivery covers information discovery and access for digital information researchers. This includes educators, knowledge professionals in education and cultural organisations, knowledge managers in media, health care and government, as well as librarians. The journal publishes research and practice which explores the digital information supply chain ie transport, flows, tracking, exchange and sharing, including within and between libraries. It is also interested in digital information capture, packaging and storage by ‘collectors’ of all kinds. Information is widely defined, including but not limited to: Records, Documents, Learning objects, Visual and sound files, Data and metadata and , User-generated content.
期刊最新文献
Visualizing the evolution of touchscreen research by scientometric analysis Analyzing user sentiments toward selected content management software: a sentiment analysis of viewer’s comments on YouTube Usability testing of a website through different devices: a task-based approach in a public university setting in Bangladesh Exploring Information Systems (IS) curricula: a semantic analysis approach Examines the value of cloud computing adoption as a proxy for IT flexibility and effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1