{"title":"不同硬膜外输液方式(连续或间歇)分娩镇痛方法的比较","authors":"Spanopoulos Konstantinos, Anagnostou Georgios, P. K. Ioiannis, Papagiannopoulou Ofilia, Zografidou Polixeni, Tsiotsiou Maria, Gogali Despoina, Pinas Dimitrios, Grenda Georgia, Grigoriou Ioulia, Goutziomitrou Evangelia","doi":"10.22514/sv.2021.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The use of a local anesthetic solution with opioids as a continuous epidural infusion administration during labor is controversial. It is considered to prolong the second stage of labor and to increase the total delivered dose of anesthetic, without improving the analgesia in comparison with the usage of the same solution in intermittent bolus doses, periodically. This study is designed to compare these two techniques. Materials and methods: In this study, 60 parturient women were included. Labor analgesia started with a single bolus dose of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.1% administered epidurally in both groups. Group A was, subsequently, given epidurally Ropivacaine 0.15% with Fentanyl 2 μgr/mL in continuous infusion with a rate of 10 mL/h throughout labor, while Group B was given the same dose per hour but in two bolus doses of 5 mL administered every 30 min. In both groups, we had the possibility of additional bolus doses of 5 mL of the same solution with a lock out interval of 20 min. The total dosage received, the duration of the 2nd stage of labor, the method of delivery (assisted or not, Cesarean section), the motor activity (using the Bromage scale) and the pain intensity (using the VAS 1–10, every 20 min) were evaluated. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration of labor (one way ANOVA), in the Bromage score and in the method of delivery between the two groups (x2 test). No differences were also observed in the recordings of pain intensity between the two groups (two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements), but in some specific instances Group A presented higher VAS score, although the total dosage of local anesthetic received was greater in this group compared to group B (180 mL vs. 162 mL, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The use of intermittent epidural bolus doses compared to a continuous infusion technique is associated with lower total consumption and periodically better pain management.","PeriodicalId":49522,"journal":{"name":"Signa Vitae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two different methods for labor analgesia depending on the mode of epidural infusion administration (continuous or intermittent)\",\"authors\":\"Spanopoulos Konstantinos, Anagnostou Georgios, P. K. Ioiannis, Papagiannopoulou Ofilia, Zografidou Polixeni, Tsiotsiou Maria, Gogali Despoina, Pinas Dimitrios, Grenda Georgia, Grigoriou Ioulia, Goutziomitrou Evangelia\",\"doi\":\"10.22514/sv.2021.167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The use of a local anesthetic solution with opioids as a continuous epidural infusion administration during labor is controversial. It is considered to prolong the second stage of labor and to increase the total delivered dose of anesthetic, without improving the analgesia in comparison with the usage of the same solution in intermittent bolus doses, periodically. This study is designed to compare these two techniques. Materials and methods: In this study, 60 parturient women were included. Labor analgesia started with a single bolus dose of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.1% administered epidurally in both groups. Group A was, subsequently, given epidurally Ropivacaine 0.15% with Fentanyl 2 μgr/mL in continuous infusion with a rate of 10 mL/h throughout labor, while Group B was given the same dose per hour but in two bolus doses of 5 mL administered every 30 min. In both groups, we had the possibility of additional bolus doses of 5 mL of the same solution with a lock out interval of 20 min. The total dosage received, the duration of the 2nd stage of labor, the method of delivery (assisted or not, Cesarean section), the motor activity (using the Bromage scale) and the pain intensity (using the VAS 1–10, every 20 min) were evaluated. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration of labor (one way ANOVA), in the Bromage score and in the method of delivery between the two groups (x2 test). No differences were also observed in the recordings of pain intensity between the two groups (two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements), but in some specific instances Group A presented higher VAS score, although the total dosage of local anesthetic received was greater in this group compared to group B (180 mL vs. 162 mL, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The use of intermittent epidural bolus doses compared to a continuous infusion technique is associated with lower total consumption and periodically better pain management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signa Vitae\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signa Vitae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2021.167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signa Vitae","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2021.167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:在分娩过程中使用含阿片类药物的局部麻醉溶液作为硬膜外持续输注是有争议的。它被认为延长第二产程,增加麻醉剂的总剂量,而不改善镇痛与使用相同的溶液间歇大剂量,定期。本研究旨在比较这两种技术。材料与方法:本研究纳入产妇60例。分娩镇痛开始时,两组均在硬膜外给药10ml 0.1%罗哌卡因。A组,随后,由于硬膜外Ropivacaine 0.15%与芬太尼在连续输注2μgr /毫升10毫升/小时的速度在劳动力,而B组被赋予相同的剂量每小时但两丸剂量的5毫升每30分钟。管理两组,我们有额外的5毫升剂量的可能性相同的解决方案与一个锁间隔20分钟。总剂量收到,第二阶段的持续时间的劳动,交付的方法(协助,剖宫产)、运动活动(使用Bromage评分)和疼痛强度(使用VAS 1-10评分,每20分钟一次)进行评估。结果:两组分娩时间(单因素方差分析)、Bromage评分、分娩方式差异均无统计学意义(x2检验)。两组之间的疼痛强度记录也没有差异(重复测量的双向方差分析),但在某些特定情况下,A组的VAS评分更高,尽管该组接受的局麻总剂量大于B组(180 mL对162 mL, p = 0.04)。结论:与连续输注技术相比,间歇硬膜外注射剂量的使用与更低的总消耗和周期性更好的疼痛管理有关。
Comparison of two different methods for labor analgesia depending on the mode of epidural infusion administration (continuous or intermittent)
Introduction: The use of a local anesthetic solution with opioids as a continuous epidural infusion administration during labor is controversial. It is considered to prolong the second stage of labor and to increase the total delivered dose of anesthetic, without improving the analgesia in comparison with the usage of the same solution in intermittent bolus doses, periodically. This study is designed to compare these two techniques. Materials and methods: In this study, 60 parturient women were included. Labor analgesia started with a single bolus dose of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.1% administered epidurally in both groups. Group A was, subsequently, given epidurally Ropivacaine 0.15% with Fentanyl 2 μgr/mL in continuous infusion with a rate of 10 mL/h throughout labor, while Group B was given the same dose per hour but in two bolus doses of 5 mL administered every 30 min. In both groups, we had the possibility of additional bolus doses of 5 mL of the same solution with a lock out interval of 20 min. The total dosage received, the duration of the 2nd stage of labor, the method of delivery (assisted or not, Cesarean section), the motor activity (using the Bromage scale) and the pain intensity (using the VAS 1–10, every 20 min) were evaluated. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration of labor (one way ANOVA), in the Bromage score and in the method of delivery between the two groups (x2 test). No differences were also observed in the recordings of pain intensity between the two groups (two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements), but in some specific instances Group A presented higher VAS score, although the total dosage of local anesthetic received was greater in this group compared to group B (180 mL vs. 162 mL, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The use of intermittent epidural bolus doses compared to a continuous infusion technique is associated with lower total consumption and periodically better pain management.
期刊介绍:
Signa Vitae is a completely open-access,peer-reviewed journal dedicate to deliver the leading edge research in anaesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine to publics. The journal’s intention is to be practice-oriented, so we focus on the clinical practice and fundamental understanding of adult, pediatric and neonatal intensive care, as well as anesthesia and emergency medicine.
Although Signa Vitae is primarily a clinical journal, we welcome submissions of basic science papers if the authors can demonstrate their clinical relevance. The Signa Vitae journal encourages scientists and academicians all around the world to share their original writings in the form of original research, review, mini-review, systematic review, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, commentary, rapid report, news and views, as well as meeting report. Full texts of all published articles, can be downloaded for free from our web site.