高密度单架栽培下日本‘CF Momotaro York’和荷兰‘奋进’番茄形态特征的差异

K. Maeda, M. Johkan, S. Tsukagoshi, T. Maruo
{"title":"高密度单架栽培下日本‘CF Momotaro York’和荷兰‘奋进’番茄形态特征的差异","authors":"K. Maeda, M. Johkan, S. Tsukagoshi, T. Maruo","doi":"10.2525/ecb.58.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dutch tomato cultivars have been bred with an emphasis on yield (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009) on the premise of long-term and high-wire system (hereinafter referred to as Dutch cultivation system). Many studies have compared the characteristics of Japanese and Dutch cultivars in order to clarify the factors of high yield (Matsuda et al., 2011a; 2011b; 2013; Kakita et al., 2015). The main reasons for the high yield of Dutch cultivars are low light extinction coefficient and high photosynthesis rate, resulting in high light utilization efficiency (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009). On the other hand, Japanese tomato cultivars have been bred with an emphasis on quality rather than yield (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009), and the selection environments for tomato cultivars differ greatly between Japan and the Netherlands. Japanese cultivars have been selected in open fields subjected to water stress, whereas Dutch cultivars have been selected in a hydroponic condition. In addition, the cultivation method mainly focuses on relatively short plant heights, such as picking meristem in 6 to 8 stages and performed twice a year, or continuous pinching cultivation. In recent years, low-node and high planting density system has attracted attention as a distinctive Japanese cultivation system for stable production of highquality tomatoes (Johkan et al., 2013;2014; Kinoshita et al., 2014; Tewolde et al., 2016). Therefore, in order to clarify the varietal characteristics of Japan and the Netherlands, it is necessary to compare those cultivars in the context of the cultivation methods in Japan and the Netherlands. In this experiment, we focused on morphological characteristics of both Japanese and Dutch cultivars. The morphological difference between Japanese and Dutch cultivars in Dutch cultivation system has been already discussed in detail (Higashide, 2018). However, there is limited information on the morphological characteristics of both cultivars in low-node and high density planting system for high-quality fruit production. In low-node and high-density planting system, the light condition in the community tends to deteriorate due to a decrease in the amount of light transmitted to lower areas caused by the 4― 5 times higher planting density compared with that in the Dutch cultivation system. As a solution to this problem, there are some reports of improvement in the training method and supplemental light within the community (Lu et al., 2012a; 2012b; Johkan et al., 2013), but these were performed using only Japanese tomato cultivars. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the differences of Japanese and Dutch cultivars by focusing on the morphological characteristics and search for suitable morphological features for the Japanese-style cultivation. In order to evaluate the difference in morphological characteristics, we use ‘CF Momotaro York’ as Japanese cultivar, and ‘Endeavour’ as Dutch cultivar. These cultivars are cultivated widely in their respective country.","PeriodicalId":85505,"journal":{"name":"Seibutsu kankyo chosetsu. [Environment control in biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences of Morphological Characteristics between Japanese Tomato ‘CF Momotaro York’ and Dutch Tomato ‘Endeavour’ with Single-truss Tomato Plants Grown at High Density\",\"authors\":\"K. Maeda, M. Johkan, S. Tsukagoshi, T. Maruo\",\"doi\":\"10.2525/ecb.58.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dutch tomato cultivars have been bred with an emphasis on yield (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009) on the premise of long-term and high-wire system (hereinafter referred to as Dutch cultivation system). Many studies have compared the characteristics of Japanese and Dutch cultivars in order to clarify the factors of high yield (Matsuda et al., 2011a; 2011b; 2013; Kakita et al., 2015). The main reasons for the high yield of Dutch cultivars are low light extinction coefficient and high photosynthesis rate, resulting in high light utilization efficiency (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009). On the other hand, Japanese tomato cultivars have been bred with an emphasis on quality rather than yield (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009), and the selection environments for tomato cultivars differ greatly between Japan and the Netherlands. Japanese cultivars have been selected in open fields subjected to water stress, whereas Dutch cultivars have been selected in a hydroponic condition. In addition, the cultivation method mainly focuses on relatively short plant heights, such as picking meristem in 6 to 8 stages and performed twice a year, or continuous pinching cultivation. In recent years, low-node and high planting density system has attracted attention as a distinctive Japanese cultivation system for stable production of highquality tomatoes (Johkan et al., 2013;2014; Kinoshita et al., 2014; Tewolde et al., 2016). Therefore, in order to clarify the varietal characteristics of Japan and the Netherlands, it is necessary to compare those cultivars in the context of the cultivation methods in Japan and the Netherlands. In this experiment, we focused on morphological characteristics of both Japanese and Dutch cultivars. The morphological difference between Japanese and Dutch cultivars in Dutch cultivation system has been already discussed in detail (Higashide, 2018). However, there is limited information on the morphological characteristics of both cultivars in low-node and high density planting system for high-quality fruit production. In low-node and high-density planting system, the light condition in the community tends to deteriorate due to a decrease in the amount of light transmitted to lower areas caused by the 4― 5 times higher planting density compared with that in the Dutch cultivation system. As a solution to this problem, there are some reports of improvement in the training method and supplemental light within the community (Lu et al., 2012a; 2012b; Johkan et al., 2013), but these were performed using only Japanese tomato cultivars. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the differences of Japanese and Dutch cultivars by focusing on the morphological characteristics and search for suitable morphological features for the Japanese-style cultivation. In order to evaluate the difference in morphological characteristics, we use ‘CF Momotaro York’ as Japanese cultivar, and ‘Endeavour’ as Dutch cultivar. These cultivars are cultivated widely in their respective country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seibutsu kankyo chosetsu. [Environment control in biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seibutsu kankyo chosetsu. [Environment control in biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.58.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seibutsu kankyo chosetsu. [Environment control in biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.58.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

荷兰番茄品种的培育以产量为重点(Higashide and Huevelink, 2009),以长期高线栽培体系(以下简称荷兰栽培体系)为前提。许多研究比较了日本和荷兰品种的特性,以阐明高产的因素(Matsuda et al., 2011;2011 b;2013;Kakita et al., 2015)。荷兰品种产量高的主要原因是光消系数低,光合速率高,光利用效率高(Higashide and Huevelink, 2009)。另一方面,日本番茄品种的培育强调质量而不是产量(Higashide和Huevelink, 2009),日本和荷兰的番茄品种选择环境差异很大。日本品种选择在受水分胁迫的开阔田地,而荷兰品种选择在水培条件下。此外,栽培方法以株高相对较短为主,如分生组织6 ~ 8期采摘,每年进行两次,或连续掐栽培。近年来,低节点高种植密度系统作为日本特色的优质番茄稳定生产栽培系统备受关注(Johkan et al., 2013;2014;木下等人,2014;Tewolde et al., 2016)。因此,为了明确日本和荷兰的品种特征,有必要在日本和荷兰栽培方法的背景下对这些品种进行比较。在本试验中,我们重点研究了日本和荷兰两个品种的形态特征。荷兰栽培系统中日本和荷兰品种的形态差异已经进行了详细讨论(Higashide, 2018)。然而,关于这两个品种在低节点高密度种植系统中用于优质果实生产的形态特征资料有限。在低节点高密度种植系统中,由于种植密度比荷兰种植系统高4 - 5倍,导致向较低区域透射的光量减少,群落的光照条件趋于恶化。为了解决这一问题,有一些报道在社区内改进了训练方法和补充光照(Lu et al., 2012a;2012 b;Johkan et al., 2013),但这些研究仅使用日本番茄品种进行。因此,本研究的目的是通过形态学特征来阐明日本和荷兰品种的差异,并寻找适合日本式栽培的形态学特征。为了评估形态特征的差异,我们使用“CF Momotaro York”作为日本品种,“奋进”作为荷兰品种。这些品种在各自的国家被广泛种植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences of Morphological Characteristics between Japanese Tomato ‘CF Momotaro York’ and Dutch Tomato ‘Endeavour’ with Single-truss Tomato Plants Grown at High Density
Dutch tomato cultivars have been bred with an emphasis on yield (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009) on the premise of long-term and high-wire system (hereinafter referred to as Dutch cultivation system). Many studies have compared the characteristics of Japanese and Dutch cultivars in order to clarify the factors of high yield (Matsuda et al., 2011a; 2011b; 2013; Kakita et al., 2015). The main reasons for the high yield of Dutch cultivars are low light extinction coefficient and high photosynthesis rate, resulting in high light utilization efficiency (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009). On the other hand, Japanese tomato cultivars have been bred with an emphasis on quality rather than yield (Higashide and Huevelink, 2009), and the selection environments for tomato cultivars differ greatly between Japan and the Netherlands. Japanese cultivars have been selected in open fields subjected to water stress, whereas Dutch cultivars have been selected in a hydroponic condition. In addition, the cultivation method mainly focuses on relatively short plant heights, such as picking meristem in 6 to 8 stages and performed twice a year, or continuous pinching cultivation. In recent years, low-node and high planting density system has attracted attention as a distinctive Japanese cultivation system for stable production of highquality tomatoes (Johkan et al., 2013;2014; Kinoshita et al., 2014; Tewolde et al., 2016). Therefore, in order to clarify the varietal characteristics of Japan and the Netherlands, it is necessary to compare those cultivars in the context of the cultivation methods in Japan and the Netherlands. In this experiment, we focused on morphological characteristics of both Japanese and Dutch cultivars. The morphological difference between Japanese and Dutch cultivars in Dutch cultivation system has been already discussed in detail (Higashide, 2018). However, there is limited information on the morphological characteristics of both cultivars in low-node and high density planting system for high-quality fruit production. In low-node and high-density planting system, the light condition in the community tends to deteriorate due to a decrease in the amount of light transmitted to lower areas caused by the 4― 5 times higher planting density compared with that in the Dutch cultivation system. As a solution to this problem, there are some reports of improvement in the training method and supplemental light within the community (Lu et al., 2012a; 2012b; Johkan et al., 2013), but these were performed using only Japanese tomato cultivars. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the differences of Japanese and Dutch cultivars by focusing on the morphological characteristics and search for suitable morphological features for the Japanese-style cultivation. In order to evaluate the difference in morphological characteristics, we use ‘CF Momotaro York’ as Japanese cultivar, and ‘Endeavour’ as Dutch cultivar. These cultivars are cultivated widely in their respective country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allelopathic Characteristic of a Noxious Weed Leptochloa chinensis Manganese Nutrition and Improved Performance of Soybean Inoculated with Rhizobia and Arbuscular Mycorrhizas in Soil with Moderately Elevated Cadmium Drying Method Affects Sugar Content in the Corm of the Medicinal Plant Pinellia ternata Breit. Effect of Monochromatic Red Light of Different Intensities during Growth on Production Efficiency of Vinblastine in Catharanthus roseus with Ultraviolet A Light Irradiation Evaluation of Leaf Contours of the Leaf Lettuce “Greenwave” Using an Elliptic Fourier Descriptor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1