内分泌学家在糖尿病患者护理中使用患者报告的结果测量:一项定性研究

IF 1 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes epidemiology and management Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2023.100159
B.K. Nielsen , M.D. Terkildsen , A.L. Jensen , M.Z. Pedersen , M.R. Hollesen , K. Lomborg
{"title":"内分泌学家在糖尿病患者护理中使用患者报告的结果测量:一项定性研究","authors":"B.K. Nielsen ,&nbsp;M.D. Terkildsen ,&nbsp;A.L. Jensen ,&nbsp;M.Z. Pedersen ,&nbsp;M.R. Hollesen ,&nbsp;K. Lomborg","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>DiabetesFlex Care is a patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based telehealth service for adults with type 1 diabetes, intended to enable patient perspectives in consultations. The study aimed to explore endocrinologists' experiences of using PRO to support dialog in diabetes consultations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thematic analysis was conducted on data from participant observations and semi-structured interviews with 13 endocrinologists engaging in DiabetesFlex consultations at a Danish hospital-based diabetes clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two themes were extracted: 'Perceiving PRO as ambiguous information' and 'Integrating PRO in the care for people with diabetes'. Endocrinologists perceived PRO as situational information with variable quality and validity, depending on patient competencies and commitment. Therefore, endocrinologists used different approaches to integrate PRO in their efforts to improve care for the individual patient. The study also showed that patients’ PRO-responses were rarely discussed among endocrinologists.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Endocrinologists experienced both potentials and challenges in using PRO to support diabetes consultations. To optimize DiabetesFlex Care and similar PRO-based diabetes consultations, a culture should be built up where clinicians share experiences to improve the quality and solve PRO-related problems in consultations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endocrinologists’ use of patient-reported outcome measures in the care of people with diabetes: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"B.K. Nielsen ,&nbsp;M.D. Terkildsen ,&nbsp;A.L. Jensen ,&nbsp;M.Z. Pedersen ,&nbsp;M.R. Hollesen ,&nbsp;K. Lomborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>DiabetesFlex Care is a patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based telehealth service for adults with type 1 diabetes, intended to enable patient perspectives in consultations. The study aimed to explore endocrinologists' experiences of using PRO to support dialog in diabetes consultations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thematic analysis was conducted on data from participant observations and semi-structured interviews with 13 endocrinologists engaging in DiabetesFlex consultations at a Danish hospital-based diabetes clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two themes were extracted: 'Perceiving PRO as ambiguous information' and 'Integrating PRO in the care for people with diabetes'. Endocrinologists perceived PRO as situational information with variable quality and validity, depending on patient competencies and commitment. Therefore, endocrinologists used different approaches to integrate PRO in their efforts to improve care for the individual patient. The study also showed that patients’ PRO-responses were rarely discussed among endocrinologists.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Endocrinologists experienced both potentials and challenges in using PRO to support diabetes consultations. To optimize DiabetesFlex Care and similar PRO-based diabetes consultations, a culture should be built up where clinicians share experiences to improve the quality and solve PRO-related problems in consultations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

diabetesflex Care是一项针对1型糖尿病成人的基于患者报告结果(PRO)的远程医疗服务,旨在使患者能够在咨询中获得观点。本研究旨在探讨内分泌学家在糖尿病会诊中使用PRO支持对话的经验。方法对在丹麦一家医院糖尿病门诊参与DiabetesFlex会诊的13名内分泌学家进行参与者观察和半结构化访谈的数据进行主题分析。结果提取了两个主题:“将PRO视为模糊信息”和“将PRO融入糖尿病患者护理”。内分泌学家认为PRO是一种情境信息,根据患者的能力和承诺,具有可变的质量和有效性。因此,内分泌学家使用不同的方法来整合PRO,以改善对个体患者的护理。研究还表明,内分泌学家很少讨论患者的pro反应。结论内分泌科医师使用PRO支持糖尿病会诊既有潜力,也有挑战。为了优化DiabetesFlex Care和类似的基于pro的糖尿病咨询,应该建立一种临床医生分享经验的文化,以提高咨询质量并解决与pro相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endocrinologists’ use of patient-reported outcome measures in the care of people with diabetes: A qualitative study

Aims

DiabetesFlex Care is a patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based telehealth service for adults with type 1 diabetes, intended to enable patient perspectives in consultations. The study aimed to explore endocrinologists' experiences of using PRO to support dialog in diabetes consultations.

Methods

Thematic analysis was conducted on data from participant observations and semi-structured interviews with 13 endocrinologists engaging in DiabetesFlex consultations at a Danish hospital-based diabetes clinic.

Results

Two themes were extracted: 'Perceiving PRO as ambiguous information' and 'Integrating PRO in the care for people with diabetes'. Endocrinologists perceived PRO as situational information with variable quality and validity, depending on patient competencies and commitment. Therefore, endocrinologists used different approaches to integrate PRO in their efforts to improve care for the individual patient. The study also showed that patients’ PRO-responses were rarely discussed among endocrinologists.

Conclusion

Endocrinologists experienced both potentials and challenges in using PRO to support diabetes consultations. To optimize DiabetesFlex Care and similar PRO-based diabetes consultations, a culture should be built up where clinicians share experiences to improve the quality and solve PRO-related problems in consultations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes epidemiology and management
Diabetes epidemiology and management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 days
期刊最新文献
Innovative immunotherapies and emerging treatments in type 1 diabetes management Autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes: Prevalence and clinical profiles Reply to increase in diabetic deaths during COVID-19 pandemic. Some comments High prevalence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, and identification of associated factors, in high-risk adults in Vietnam: A cross-sectional study editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1