安全度量模型的综合比较

IF 1.1 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Applied Security Research Pub Date : 2022-02-10 DOI:10.1080/19361610.2021.1981089
M. Khaleghi, M. Aref, M. Rasti
{"title":"安全度量模型的综合比较","authors":"M. Khaleghi, M. Aref, M. Rasti","doi":"10.1080/19361610.2021.1981089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Security measurement models (SMMs) and their corresponding derived metrics form the main pillars of a systematic security measurement. Providing a desirable SMM is very challenging and has been investigated over the past two decades, so that numerous SMMs have been proposed and several surveys on SMMs have been performed. However, to the best of our knowledge, neither a systematic taxonomy nor a comprehensive comparison has yet been proposed for SMMs. This paper focuses on the comprehensive comparison of SMMs relying on a feature-based approach. The plurality and diversity of the compared SMMs enable us to deduce all the open issues.","PeriodicalId":44585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Security Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"333 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Comparison of Security Measurement Models\",\"authors\":\"M. Khaleghi, M. Aref, M. Rasti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19361610.2021.1981089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Security measurement models (SMMs) and their corresponding derived metrics form the main pillars of a systematic security measurement. Providing a desirable SMM is very challenging and has been investigated over the past two decades, so that numerous SMMs have been proposed and several surveys on SMMs have been performed. However, to the best of our knowledge, neither a systematic taxonomy nor a comprehensive comparison has yet been proposed for SMMs. This paper focuses on the comprehensive comparison of SMMs relying on a feature-based approach. The plurality and diversity of the compared SMMs enable us to deduce all the open issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Security Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"333 - 401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Security Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1981089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Security Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1981089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要安全度量模型及其相应的派生度量构成了系统安全度量的主要支柱。提供理想的SMM是非常具有挑战性的,并且在过去二十年中已经进行了研究,因此已经提出了许多SMM,并对SMM进行了几次调查。然而,据我们所知,既没有系统的分类法,也没有对SMM进行全面的比较。本文侧重于基于特征的方法对SMM进行综合比较。所比较的SMM的多样性和多样性使我们能够推断出所有悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive Comparison of Security Measurement Models
Abstract Security measurement models (SMMs) and their corresponding derived metrics form the main pillars of a systematic security measurement. Providing a desirable SMM is very challenging and has been investigated over the past two decades, so that numerous SMMs have been proposed and several surveys on SMMs have been performed. However, to the best of our knowledge, neither a systematic taxonomy nor a comprehensive comparison has yet been proposed for SMMs. This paper focuses on the comprehensive comparison of SMMs relying on a feature-based approach. The plurality and diversity of the compared SMMs enable us to deduce all the open issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Security Research
Journal of Applied Security Research CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Campus Security and Crime Prevention: A View from a Police Chief with a Ph.D. in Criminology Privacy, Data Protection and Cyber Crimes: Mapping Perceptions of Pakistani Users Theoretical and Experimental Framework for Estimating Cyber Victimization Risk in a Hybrid Physical-Virtual World Cybersecurity Risk Management Scenarios for Teaching Information Security Management The Rise of #Cartels: Exploring the Organizational Operations and Messaging of Public Perception on Twitter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1