贝叶斯模型的潜在结构的个体差异在数值大小-一致性效应

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-24 DOI:10.1080/20445911.2022.2136186
Thomas J. Faulkenberry, K. Bowman
{"title":"贝叶斯模型的潜在结构的个体差异在数值大小-一致性效应","authors":"Thomas J. Faulkenberry, K. Bowman","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2022.2136186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When people choose the physically larger of two numerals, they are often slower when relative physical size is incongruent with numerical magnitude. This size-congruity effect not only informs our understanding of mental representations of number, but also serves as an index for numerical ability in individuals. In this paper, we apply methods of Haaf and Rouder (2017) to examine the size-congruity effect through the lens of individual differences. We develop and compare hierarchical Bayesian mixed models with varying levels of constraint on the individual size-congruity effects. In three data sets, the winning model was one in which the size-congruity effect was constrained to be positive. This indicates that, at least in the context of a physical comparison task with Arabic numerals, everyone exhibits a positive size-congruity effect. We discuss these results in the context of measurement fidelity and theory-building in numerical cognition.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"217 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian modelling of the latent structure of individual differences in the numerical size-congruity effect\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Faulkenberry, K. Bowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20445911.2022.2136186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT When people choose the physically larger of two numerals, they are often slower when relative physical size is incongruent with numerical magnitude. This size-congruity effect not only informs our understanding of mental representations of number, but also serves as an index for numerical ability in individuals. In this paper, we apply methods of Haaf and Rouder (2017) to examine the size-congruity effect through the lens of individual differences. We develop and compare hierarchical Bayesian mixed models with varying levels of constraint on the individual size-congruity effects. In three data sets, the winning model was one in which the size-congruity effect was constrained to be positive. This indicates that, at least in the context of a physical comparison task with Arabic numerals, everyone exhibits a positive size-congruity effect. We discuss these results in the context of measurement fidelity and theory-building in numerical cognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"217 - 232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2136186\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2136186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要当人们选择两个数字中较大的一个时,当相对物理大小与数字大小不一致时,他们的速度往往较慢。这种大小一致性效应不仅为我们理解数字的心理表征提供了信息,而且也是个体数字能力的一个指标。在本文中,我们应用Haaf和Rouder(2017)的方法,通过个体差异的视角来检验尺寸一致性效应。我们开发并比较了对个体大小一致性效应具有不同约束水平的分层贝叶斯混合模型。在三个数据集中,获胜模型的大小一致性效应被约束为正。这表明,至少在阿拉伯数字的物理比较任务中,每个人都表现出积极的大小一致性效应。我们在数值认知中的测量保真度和理论构建的背景下讨论这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bayesian modelling of the latent structure of individual differences in the numerical size-congruity effect
ABSTRACT When people choose the physically larger of two numerals, they are often slower when relative physical size is incongruent with numerical magnitude. This size-congruity effect not only informs our understanding of mental representations of number, but also serves as an index for numerical ability in individuals. In this paper, we apply methods of Haaf and Rouder (2017) to examine the size-congruity effect through the lens of individual differences. We develop and compare hierarchical Bayesian mixed models with varying levels of constraint on the individual size-congruity effects. In three data sets, the winning model was one in which the size-congruity effect was constrained to be positive. This indicates that, at least in the context of a physical comparison task with Arabic numerals, everyone exhibits a positive size-congruity effect. We discuss these results in the context of measurement fidelity and theory-building in numerical cognition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Journal of Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Eye-movement methodology reveals a shift in attention from threat to neutral stimuli with self-reported symptoms of social anxiety across children, adolescents and adults Individual differences and counterfactual thinking Distinct patterns of emotional processing in ADHD and anxiety. Evidence from an eye-movement Go/No-Go task Why I am not a Turing machine Self and mother referential processing in phonological false memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1