社会驱动型风险投资公司的结构维度:资本市场中的社会创新

Raymond J. Jones, Manjula S. Salimath
{"title":"社会驱动型风险投资公司的结构维度:资本市场中的社会创新","authors":"Raymond J. Jones, Manjula S. Salimath","doi":"10.1108/neje-07-2020-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposePrivate equity and venture capital (VC) firms in the capital markets sector invest capital with the primary goal of delivering economic value. However, some firms in the capital markets sector have started to shift this focus to create (i.e. invest in) social value. More specifically, traditional VC firms are starting socially oriented funds, while other firms have emerged to focus solely on investments in social enterprises. These VC firms are contributing to an interesting paradox – performance metrics are not measured by profit alone but also by social innovation. From an architectural perspective, the authors examine the implications of internal design, i.e. how specific strategic and structural factors influence the financial performance of VC firms with a social orientation to determine if these firms really can “do well and do good.”Design/methodology/approachSocial orientation was determined by content analysis of mission statements of the VC firms. Firm strategies, structures and performance were sourced from secondary data. A moderated mediation model was used to test relationships.FindingsResults suggest that (1) socially responsible VC firms adopt distinct foci of social investing that directs their strategic orientation and (2) these various foci have vastly differing effects on the firm's overall performance, strategic decisions made and the architecture of their structural design.Originality/valueThis study is among the first to explore socially responsible VC architectural dimensions, with implications for firm design based on blended measures of success.","PeriodicalId":32839,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Entrepreneurship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Architectural dimensions of socially driven venture capital firms: social innovation in the capital markets\",\"authors\":\"Raymond J. Jones, Manjula S. Salimath\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/neje-07-2020-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposePrivate equity and venture capital (VC) firms in the capital markets sector invest capital with the primary goal of delivering economic value. However, some firms in the capital markets sector have started to shift this focus to create (i.e. invest in) social value. More specifically, traditional VC firms are starting socially oriented funds, while other firms have emerged to focus solely on investments in social enterprises. These VC firms are contributing to an interesting paradox – performance metrics are not measured by profit alone but also by social innovation. From an architectural perspective, the authors examine the implications of internal design, i.e. how specific strategic and structural factors influence the financial performance of VC firms with a social orientation to determine if these firms really can “do well and do good.”Design/methodology/approachSocial orientation was determined by content analysis of mission statements of the VC firms. Firm strategies, structures and performance were sourced from secondary data. A moderated mediation model was used to test relationships.FindingsResults suggest that (1) socially responsible VC firms adopt distinct foci of social investing that directs their strategic orientation and (2) these various foci have vastly differing effects on the firm's overall performance, strategic decisions made and the architecture of their structural design.Originality/valueThis study is among the first to explore socially responsible VC architectural dimensions, with implications for firm design based on blended measures of success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/neje-07-2020-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/neje-07-2020-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

私募股权和风险投资(VC)公司在资本市场部门投资资本的主要目标是提供经济价值。然而,资本市场部门的一些公司已经开始将这一重点转向创造(即投资)社会价值。更具体地说,传统的风险投资公司正在启动面向社会的基金,而其他公司已经出现,只专注于投资社会企业。这些风投公司正在促成一个有趣的悖论——绩效指标不仅由利润衡量,还由社会创新衡量。从架构的角度来看,作者研究了内部设计的含义,即特定的战略和结构因素如何影响具有社会取向的风险投资公司的财务绩效,以确定这些公司是否真的可以“做得好,做得好”。设计/方法/途径社会取向是由VC公司使命宣言的内容分析决定的。公司战略、结构和业绩来源于二手数据。采用有调节的中介模型检验关系。研究结果表明:(1)社会责任风险投资公司采用不同的社会投资焦点来指导其战略方向;(2)这些不同的焦点对公司的整体绩效、战略决策和结构设计的架构有很大不同的影响。原创性/价值这项研究是第一批探索社会责任风险投资架构维度的研究之一,它对基于成功的混合衡量标准的公司设计具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Architectural dimensions of socially driven venture capital firms: social innovation in the capital markets
PurposePrivate equity and venture capital (VC) firms in the capital markets sector invest capital with the primary goal of delivering economic value. However, some firms in the capital markets sector have started to shift this focus to create (i.e. invest in) social value. More specifically, traditional VC firms are starting socially oriented funds, while other firms have emerged to focus solely on investments in social enterprises. These VC firms are contributing to an interesting paradox – performance metrics are not measured by profit alone but also by social innovation. From an architectural perspective, the authors examine the implications of internal design, i.e. how specific strategic and structural factors influence the financial performance of VC firms with a social orientation to determine if these firms really can “do well and do good.”Design/methodology/approachSocial orientation was determined by content analysis of mission statements of the VC firms. Firm strategies, structures and performance were sourced from secondary data. A moderated mediation model was used to test relationships.FindingsResults suggest that (1) socially responsible VC firms adopt distinct foci of social investing that directs their strategic orientation and (2) these various foci have vastly differing effects on the firm's overall performance, strategic decisions made and the architecture of their structural design.Originality/valueThis study is among the first to explore socially responsible VC architectural dimensions, with implications for firm design based on blended measures of success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Entrepreneurship
New England Journal of Entrepreneurship Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enterprising spirit rejuvenated: entrepreneurship education in shaping company employees' career commitment and turnover intentions Exploring the motivating factors for opportunity recognition among social entrepreneurs: a qualitative study Effects of gender equality and social costs of failure on early-stage entrepreneurship activity Personal traits and formalization of entrepreneurial ventures: insights from a developing country Transitional entrepreneurship: unleashing entrepreneurial potential across numerous challenging contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1