{"title":"Sierpinski四面体商空间上若干动力系统的比较","authors":"N. Aslan, M. Saltan, B. Demir","doi":"10.31801/cfsuasmas.1126635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, it is aimed to construct two different dynamical systems on the Sierpinski tetrahedron. To this end, we consider the dynamical systems on a quotient space of $\\{ 0,1,2,3 \\}^{\\mathbb{N}}$ by using the code representations of the points on the Sierpinski tetrahedron. Finally, we compare the periodic points to investigate topological conjugacy of these dynamical systems and we conclude that they are not topologically equivalent.","PeriodicalId":44692,"journal":{"name":"Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara-Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of some dynamical systems on the quotient space of the Sierpinski tetrahedron\",\"authors\":\"N. Aslan, M. Saltan, B. Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.31801/cfsuasmas.1126635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, it is aimed to construct two different dynamical systems on the Sierpinski tetrahedron. To this end, we consider the dynamical systems on a quotient space of $\\\\{ 0,1,2,3 \\\\}^{\\\\mathbb{N}}$ by using the code representations of the points on the Sierpinski tetrahedron. Finally, we compare the periodic points to investigate topological conjugacy of these dynamical systems and we conclude that they are not topologically equivalent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara-Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara-Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31801/cfsuasmas.1126635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara-Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31801/cfsuasmas.1126635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of some dynamical systems on the quotient space of the Sierpinski tetrahedron
In this paper, it is aimed to construct two different dynamical systems on the Sierpinski tetrahedron. To this end, we consider the dynamical systems on a quotient space of $\{ 0,1,2,3 \}^{\mathbb{N}}$ by using the code representations of the points on the Sierpinski tetrahedron. Finally, we compare the periodic points to investigate topological conjugacy of these dynamical systems and we conclude that they are not topologically equivalent.