政府组建与激进右翼:瑞典的例外?

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Government and Opposition Pub Date : 2022-03-02 DOI:10.1017/gov.2022.1
Anders Backlund
{"title":"政府组建与激进右翼:瑞典的例外?","authors":"Anders Backlund","doi":"10.1017/gov.2022.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article tests the claim that government cooperation between mainstream parties and radical right parties can be explained by coalition theory. It does so by analysing three Swedish cases of coalition formation where the radical right Sweden Democrats (SD) have remained excluded despite holding a pivotal position in the parliament. It argues that, with the right analytical tools, this exclusion can be explained by coalition theory: cooperation with the SD has been unattractive in terms of policy, and unnecessary because the mainstream parties have been able to form viable minority governments. This argument requires three things: first, that we consider the two-dimensional nature of Swedish politics; second, that we shift the focus from majority government to viable government; and third, that we acknowledge strategic time horizons that extend well into the future. The findings contribute to our understanding of coalition formation and of how mainstream parties respond strategically to the radical right.","PeriodicalId":47758,"journal":{"name":"Government and Opposition","volume":"58 1","pages":"882 - 898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government Formation and the Radical Right: A Swedish Exception?\",\"authors\":\"Anders Backlund\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/gov.2022.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article tests the claim that government cooperation between mainstream parties and radical right parties can be explained by coalition theory. It does so by analysing three Swedish cases of coalition formation where the radical right Sweden Democrats (SD) have remained excluded despite holding a pivotal position in the parliament. It argues that, with the right analytical tools, this exclusion can be explained by coalition theory: cooperation with the SD has been unattractive in terms of policy, and unnecessary because the mainstream parties have been able to form viable minority governments. This argument requires three things: first, that we consider the two-dimensional nature of Swedish politics; second, that we shift the focus from majority government to viable government; and third, that we acknowledge strategic time horizons that extend well into the future. The findings contribute to our understanding of coalition formation and of how mainstream parties respond strategically to the radical right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Government and Opposition\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"882 - 898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Government and Opposition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government and Opposition","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文检验了主流政党与极右翼政党之间的政府合作可以用联合执政理论来解释的论断。这是通过分析瑞典的三个联合组阁案例得出的结论,在这些案例中,激进右翼的瑞典民主党(SD)尽管在议会中占据关键地位,但仍被排除在外。它认为,使用正确的分析工具,这种排斥可以用联合理论来解释:与民主党的合作在政策方面没有吸引力,而且没有必要,因为主流政党已经能够组建可行的少数党政府。这个论点需要三个条件:首先,我们要考虑瑞典政治的二维本质;第二,我们将重点从多数政府转向可行的政府;第三,我们承认战略的时间跨度可以延伸到未来。这些发现有助于我们理解联合政府的形成,以及主流政党如何在战略上应对激进右翼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Government Formation and the Radical Right: A Swedish Exception?
Abstract This article tests the claim that government cooperation between mainstream parties and radical right parties can be explained by coalition theory. It does so by analysing three Swedish cases of coalition formation where the radical right Sweden Democrats (SD) have remained excluded despite holding a pivotal position in the parliament. It argues that, with the right analytical tools, this exclusion can be explained by coalition theory: cooperation with the SD has been unattractive in terms of policy, and unnecessary because the mainstream parties have been able to form viable minority governments. This argument requires three things: first, that we consider the two-dimensional nature of Swedish politics; second, that we shift the focus from majority government to viable government; and third, that we acknowledge strategic time horizons that extend well into the future. The findings contribute to our understanding of coalition formation and of how mainstream parties respond strategically to the radical right.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Government and Opposition
Government and Opposition POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Government and Opposition has been a leading international journal of comparative politics for over 40 years. Its distinctive voice amongst politics journals has ensured a large, worldwide circulation. Government and Opposition"s interests include: - developments in the theory and practice of democracy, including significant elections the evolution of political parties, and the consequences of new political challenges for governments and oppositions - the governance of the global economy and the implications of interdependence worldwide politics - including the politics of the European Union - major issues of public policy, especially from a comparative perspective theoretical and ethical dimensions of political issues and policy.
期刊最新文献
Party-System Polarization and Individual Perceptions of Party Differences: Two Divergent Effects on Turnout The Anti-Authoritarian Populisms: Ideologies of Democratic Struggle in Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Worldwide GOV volume 59 issue 1 Cover and Back matter GOV volume 59 issue 1 Cover and Front matter Religious Institutions’ Stances towards Autocratization in the Post-Third Wave Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1