“在一个没有尽头的阶梯上挣扎”:神正论及其给黑人解放神学带来的失败

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION BLACK THEOLOGY Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652
Jamall A. Calloway
{"title":"“在一个没有尽头的阶梯上挣扎”:神正论及其给黑人解放神学带来的失败","authors":"Jamall A. Calloway","doi":"10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There has been much criticism – and an overall unfortunate dismissal – of William R. Jones' Is God A White Racist?: A Preamble to Black Theology (1973) in the literature of Black liberation theology. What is undertheorized, however, is the constructive possibilities of Jones' work. Analyzing the theological debate between Jones and James H. Cone provides us with the necessary material in order to construct a Black theology that commences with the assumptions of Jones' theodicy. I argue that theodicy is a useful “controlling category” for Black liberation theology, but only – and here I am following Kant – as a result of how its collapses rational arguments for believing in God/liberation. And it is precisely this failure that makes it profoundly useful as an avenue into understanding the contours of “Black faith” that undergirds Black liberation theology.","PeriodicalId":42729,"journal":{"name":"BLACK THEOLOGY","volume":"18 1","pages":"223 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“To Struggle Up a Never-Ending Stair”: Theodicy and the Failure It Gifts to Black Liberation Theology\",\"authors\":\"Jamall A. Calloway\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT There has been much criticism – and an overall unfortunate dismissal – of William R. Jones' Is God A White Racist?: A Preamble to Black Theology (1973) in the literature of Black liberation theology. What is undertheorized, however, is the constructive possibilities of Jones' work. Analyzing the theological debate between Jones and James H. Cone provides us with the necessary material in order to construct a Black theology that commences with the assumptions of Jones' theodicy. I argue that theodicy is a useful “controlling category” for Black liberation theology, but only – and here I am following Kant – as a result of how its collapses rational arguments for believing in God/liberation. And it is precisely this failure that makes it profoundly useful as an avenue into understanding the contours of “Black faith” that undergirds Black liberation theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"223 - 245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

对威廉·r·琼斯的《上帝是白人种族主义者吗?》《黑人神学的序曲》(1973)是黑人解放神学文献中的一部。然而,琼斯工作的建设性可能性却没有被理论化。分析琼斯和詹姆斯·h·科恩之间的神学辩论为我们提供了必要的材料,以便构建一种以琼斯的神正论假设为起点的黑人神学。我认为神正论是黑人解放神学的一个有用的“控制范畴”,但这只是——我在这里追随康德——它如何瓦解了相信上帝/解放的理性论证的结果。正是这种失败使得它成为理解黑人解放神学基础上的“黑人信仰”轮廓的重要途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“To Struggle Up a Never-Ending Stair”: Theodicy and the Failure It Gifts to Black Liberation Theology
ABSTRACT There has been much criticism – and an overall unfortunate dismissal – of William R. Jones' Is God A White Racist?: A Preamble to Black Theology (1973) in the literature of Black liberation theology. What is undertheorized, however, is the constructive possibilities of Jones' work. Analyzing the theological debate between Jones and James H. Cone provides us with the necessary material in order to construct a Black theology that commences with the assumptions of Jones' theodicy. I argue that theodicy is a useful “controlling category” for Black liberation theology, but only – and here I am following Kant – as a result of how its collapses rational arguments for believing in God/liberation. And it is precisely this failure that makes it profoundly useful as an avenue into understanding the contours of “Black faith” that undergirds Black liberation theology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BLACK THEOLOGY
BLACK THEOLOGY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Terror and Triumph: The Nature of Black Religion Terror and Triumph: The Nature of Black Religion 20th Anniversary Edition, by Anthony B. Pinn, Minneapolis, Fortress Press, 2022, 338 pp., $29.00 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-5064-7473-1 Sisters in the “Hostile Environment”: A Womanist Theological Analysis of Brexit Faith In Unions: Racism and Religious Exclusion in the Faith Workers Branch of Unite the Union 2017–2020 Faith In Unions: Racism and Religious Exclusion in the Faith Workers Branch of Unite the Union 2017–2020 , by David Isiorho, Eugene, OR, Resource Publications, 2022, 116 pp., £15 (Paperback). ISBN 978-1-5326-9916-0 Workers as Human Beings: Recognising the imago Dei in the Neoliberal Workplace Black scholars matter: visions, struggles, and hopes in Africana Biblical studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1