近亲婚姻的先天性感音神经性听力损失——耳蜗长度是否不同

IF 0.1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING West African Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.4103/wajr.wajr_40_17
R. Aggarwal, Kavitha Yellur, U. Joish, R. George, H. Swami, Sabarigirish Kanjully
{"title":"近亲婚姻的先天性感音神经性听力损失——耳蜗长度是否不同","authors":"R. Aggarwal, Kavitha Yellur, U. Joish, R. George, H. Swami, Sabarigirish Kanjully","doi":"10.4103/wajr.wajr_40_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: There is an increased prevalence of congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) among children born out of consanguineous wedlocks, and congenital deafness is associated with increased prevalence of structural inner-ear malformations. This study is done to evaluate whether consanguinity affects the cochlear length, which in turn will influence the type of cochlear implant and depth of electrode insertion during surgery in these patients. Methods: Children presenting with congenital SNHL and born out of consanguineous marriages (Group A) were compared with children presenting with SNHL and born out of nonconsanguineous marriages (Group B). Patients in both groups were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging as a routine pretreatment workup. A high-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolution imaging of the inner ears was performed. Curved multiplanar reconstruction module was used to deconvolute the membranous cochlea and measure its length. The cochlear lengths among both the groups were compared using analysis of variance test. Results: A total of seven patients were included in both Groups A and B each. The mean length of membranous cochlea in Group A was 22.6 mm and Group B was 22.5 mm. There was no statistically significant variation in the cochlear lengths of both the groups. Conclusion: Consanguinity is unlikely to produce any significant variation in the length of the cochlea.","PeriodicalId":29875,"journal":{"name":"West African Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Congenital sensorineural hearing loss in consanguineous marriages – Does the cochlear length vary\",\"authors\":\"R. Aggarwal, Kavitha Yellur, U. Joish, R. George, H. Swami, Sabarigirish Kanjully\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/wajr.wajr_40_17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: There is an increased prevalence of congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) among children born out of consanguineous wedlocks, and congenital deafness is associated with increased prevalence of structural inner-ear malformations. This study is done to evaluate whether consanguinity affects the cochlear length, which in turn will influence the type of cochlear implant and depth of electrode insertion during surgery in these patients. Methods: Children presenting with congenital SNHL and born out of consanguineous marriages (Group A) were compared with children presenting with SNHL and born out of nonconsanguineous marriages (Group B). Patients in both groups were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging as a routine pretreatment workup. A high-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolution imaging of the inner ears was performed. Curved multiplanar reconstruction module was used to deconvolute the membranous cochlea and measure its length. The cochlear lengths among both the groups were compared using analysis of variance test. Results: A total of seven patients were included in both Groups A and B each. The mean length of membranous cochlea in Group A was 22.6 mm and Group B was 22.5 mm. There was no statistically significant variation in the cochlear lengths of both the groups. Conclusion: Consanguinity is unlikely to produce any significant variation in the length of the cochlea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West African Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West African Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/wajr.wajr_40_17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West African Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wajr.wajr_40_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先天性感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)在近亲婚姻出生的儿童中患病率增加,先天性耳聋与结构性内耳畸形的患病率增加有关。本研究旨在评估亲属关系是否会影响人工耳蜗长度,进而影响这些患者手术中人工耳蜗的类型和电极插入深度。方法:将近亲婚姻出生的先天性SNHL患儿(A组)与非近亲婚姻出生的先天性SNHL患儿(B组)进行比较。两组患者均采用磁共振成像作为常规预处理工作。利用不同的内耳翻转角度演化成像进行了高分辨率三维t2加权采样完善和应用优化对比度。采用曲面多平面重构模块对耳膜进行反卷积并测量耳膜长度。采用方差分析检验比较两组患者的耳蜗长度。结果:A组和B组各7例。A组耳膜平均长度22.6 mm, B组耳膜平均长度22.5 mm。两组耳蜗长度无统计学差异。结论:血缘关系对耳蜗长度的影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Congenital sensorineural hearing loss in consanguineous marriages – Does the cochlear length vary
Objective: There is an increased prevalence of congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) among children born out of consanguineous wedlocks, and congenital deafness is associated with increased prevalence of structural inner-ear malformations. This study is done to evaluate whether consanguinity affects the cochlear length, which in turn will influence the type of cochlear implant and depth of electrode insertion during surgery in these patients. Methods: Children presenting with congenital SNHL and born out of consanguineous marriages (Group A) were compared with children presenting with SNHL and born out of nonconsanguineous marriages (Group B). Patients in both groups were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging as a routine pretreatment workup. A high-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolution imaging of the inner ears was performed. Curved multiplanar reconstruction module was used to deconvolute the membranous cochlea and measure its length. The cochlear lengths among both the groups were compared using analysis of variance test. Results: A total of seven patients were included in both Groups A and B each. The mean length of membranous cochlea in Group A was 22.6 mm and Group B was 22.5 mm. There was no statistically significant variation in the cochlear lengths of both the groups. Conclusion: Consanguinity is unlikely to produce any significant variation in the length of the cochlea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
West African Journal of Radiology
West African Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inner ear computed tomography findings among children with audiometry proven sensorineural hearing loss in a special needs school in South-West, Nigeria Validity of sonographic prediction of birth weight: A study of three algorithms in a cohort of healthy pregnant women of Yoruba descent in a suburb of Lagos state, Southwest Nigeria Multiparametric differentiation of intracranial central nervous system lymphoma and high-grade glioma using diffusion-, perfusion-, susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and spectroscopy Cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma: Unusual presentation in a 3-year-old girl with classical imaging features Contrast radiographic anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract of white-bellied pangolin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1