G. Rutherford, Lieo Jiun Tan, O. Aboumarzouk, J. de Souza, R. Khan, B. Somani, T. Amer
{"title":"膀胱内庆大霉素治疗复发性尿路感染:近二十年的系统综述","authors":"G. Rutherford, Lieo Jiun Tan, O. Aboumarzouk, J. de Souza, R. Khan, B. Somani, T. Amer","doi":"10.1177/20514158221138845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) have a significant effect on a patient’s quality of life and frequent use of antibiotics increases multi-drug resistance. Previous research on intravesical antibiotics suggests that this has a local effect on bacteria with reduced systemic absorption and associated side effects. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of intravesical gentamicin treatment. Systematic review of all English published articles from January 2001 to October 2021 according to the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. A total of 139 studies were identified, 20 full-text articles were screened and 6 subsequently included totalling 166 patients. All studies reported a decrease in the mean number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a significant reduction ( p = 0.0025 and p < 0.004) in two studies. When the number of breakthrough UTIs on prophylactic gentamicin installations was assessed, 65% ( n = 86/133) remained UTI free. Throughout treatment, 99% of serum gentamicin levels were <0.3 ng/dL, and reported instances of increased creatinine were low (2%). A decrease in the growth of multi-drug-resistant bacteria was reported in two papers ( p = 0.065 and p = 0.04). Intravesical gentamicin seems to be an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic rUTIs. The evidence suggests it also reduces UTIs caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria with no systemic absorption and minimal renal toxicity. 2a","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravesical gentamicin treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections: A systematic review over the last two decades\",\"authors\":\"G. Rutherford, Lieo Jiun Tan, O. Aboumarzouk, J. de Souza, R. Khan, B. Somani, T. Amer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20514158221138845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) have a significant effect on a patient’s quality of life and frequent use of antibiotics increases multi-drug resistance. Previous research on intravesical antibiotics suggests that this has a local effect on bacteria with reduced systemic absorption and associated side effects. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of intravesical gentamicin treatment. Systematic review of all English published articles from January 2001 to October 2021 according to the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. A total of 139 studies were identified, 20 full-text articles were screened and 6 subsequently included totalling 166 patients. All studies reported a decrease in the mean number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a significant reduction ( p = 0.0025 and p < 0.004) in two studies. When the number of breakthrough UTIs on prophylactic gentamicin installations was assessed, 65% ( n = 86/133) remained UTI free. Throughout treatment, 99% of serum gentamicin levels were <0.3 ng/dL, and reported instances of increased creatinine were low (2%). A decrease in the growth of multi-drug-resistant bacteria was reported in two papers ( p = 0.065 and p = 0.04). Intravesical gentamicin seems to be an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic rUTIs. The evidence suggests it also reduces UTIs caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria with no systemic absorption and minimal renal toxicity. 2a\",\"PeriodicalId\":15471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221138845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221138845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intravesical gentamicin treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections: A systematic review over the last two decades
Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) have a significant effect on a patient’s quality of life and frequent use of antibiotics increases multi-drug resistance. Previous research on intravesical antibiotics suggests that this has a local effect on bacteria with reduced systemic absorption and associated side effects. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of intravesical gentamicin treatment. Systematic review of all English published articles from January 2001 to October 2021 according to the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. A total of 139 studies were identified, 20 full-text articles were screened and 6 subsequently included totalling 166 patients. All studies reported a decrease in the mean number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a significant reduction ( p = 0.0025 and p < 0.004) in two studies. When the number of breakthrough UTIs on prophylactic gentamicin installations was assessed, 65% ( n = 86/133) remained UTI free. Throughout treatment, 99% of serum gentamicin levels were <0.3 ng/dL, and reported instances of increased creatinine were low (2%). A decrease in the growth of multi-drug-resistant bacteria was reported in two papers ( p = 0.065 and p = 0.04). Intravesical gentamicin seems to be an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic rUTIs. The evidence suggests it also reduces UTIs caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria with no systemic absorption and minimal renal toxicity. 2a