膀胱内庆大霉素治疗复发性尿路感染:近二十年的系统综述

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1177/20514158221138845
G. Rutherford, Lieo Jiun Tan, O. Aboumarzouk, J. de Souza, R. Khan, B. Somani, T. Amer
{"title":"膀胱内庆大霉素治疗复发性尿路感染:近二十年的系统综述","authors":"G. Rutherford, Lieo Jiun Tan, O. Aboumarzouk, J. de Souza, R. Khan, B. Somani, T. Amer","doi":"10.1177/20514158221138845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) have a significant effect on a patient’s quality of life and frequent use of antibiotics increases multi-drug resistance. Previous research on intravesical antibiotics suggests that this has a local effect on bacteria with reduced systemic absorption and associated side effects. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of intravesical gentamicin treatment. Systematic review of all English published articles from January 2001 to October 2021 according to the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. A total of 139 studies were identified, 20 full-text articles were screened and 6 subsequently included totalling 166 patients. All studies reported a decrease in the mean number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a significant reduction ( p = 0.0025 and p < 0.004) in two studies. When the number of breakthrough UTIs on prophylactic gentamicin installations was assessed, 65% ( n = 86/133) remained UTI free. Throughout treatment, 99% of serum gentamicin levels were <0.3 ng/dL, and reported instances of increased creatinine were low (2%). A decrease in the growth of multi-drug-resistant bacteria was reported in two papers ( p = 0.065 and p = 0.04). Intravesical gentamicin seems to be an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic rUTIs. The evidence suggests it also reduces UTIs caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria with no systemic absorption and minimal renal toxicity. 2a","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravesical gentamicin treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections: A systematic review over the last two decades\",\"authors\":\"G. Rutherford, Lieo Jiun Tan, O. Aboumarzouk, J. de Souza, R. Khan, B. Somani, T. Amer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20514158221138845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) have a significant effect on a patient’s quality of life and frequent use of antibiotics increases multi-drug resistance. Previous research on intravesical antibiotics suggests that this has a local effect on bacteria with reduced systemic absorption and associated side effects. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of intravesical gentamicin treatment. Systematic review of all English published articles from January 2001 to October 2021 according to the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. A total of 139 studies were identified, 20 full-text articles were screened and 6 subsequently included totalling 166 patients. All studies reported a decrease in the mean number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a significant reduction ( p = 0.0025 and p < 0.004) in two studies. When the number of breakthrough UTIs on prophylactic gentamicin installations was assessed, 65% ( n = 86/133) remained UTI free. Throughout treatment, 99% of serum gentamicin levels were <0.3 ng/dL, and reported instances of increased creatinine were low (2%). A decrease in the growth of multi-drug-resistant bacteria was reported in two papers ( p = 0.065 and p = 0.04). Intravesical gentamicin seems to be an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic rUTIs. The evidence suggests it also reduces UTIs caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria with no systemic absorption and minimal renal toxicity. 2a\",\"PeriodicalId\":15471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221138845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221138845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复发性尿路感染(rUTIs)对患者的生活质量有显著影响,频繁使用抗生素会增加多药耐药性。以前对膀胱内抗生素的研究表明,这对细菌有局部作用,减少全身吸收和相关的副作用。我们对膀胱内庆大霉素治疗的有效性和不良反应进行了系统评价。对2001年1月至2021年10月期间发表的所有英文文章进行系统评价,根据Cochrane和首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)标准。共纳入139项研究,筛选了20篇全文文章,随后纳入了6篇,共纳入166名患者。所有研究均报告尿路感染(uti)的平均数量减少,其中两项研究显著减少(p = 0.0025和p < 0.004)。当评估预防性庆大霉素安装的突破UTI数量时,65% (n = 86/133)仍然没有UTI。在整个治疗过程中,99%的血清庆大霉素水平<0.3 ng/dL,报告的肌酐升高的病例很低(2%)。两篇论文报道了多重耐药菌的生长减少(p = 0.065和p = 0.04)。膀胱内庆大霉素似乎是治疗有症状rUTIs患者的有效方法。有证据表明,它还可以减少由多重耐药细菌引起的尿路感染,而且没有全身吸收,肾脏毒性很小。2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravesical gentamicin treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections: A systematic review over the last two decades
Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) have a significant effect on a patient’s quality of life and frequent use of antibiotics increases multi-drug resistance. Previous research on intravesical antibiotics suggests that this has a local effect on bacteria with reduced systemic absorption and associated side effects. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of intravesical gentamicin treatment. Systematic review of all English published articles from January 2001 to October 2021 according to the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. A total of 139 studies were identified, 20 full-text articles were screened and 6 subsequently included totalling 166 patients. All studies reported a decrease in the mean number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a significant reduction ( p = 0.0025 and p < 0.004) in two studies. When the number of breakthrough UTIs on prophylactic gentamicin installations was assessed, 65% ( n = 86/133) remained UTI free. Throughout treatment, 99% of serum gentamicin levels were <0.3 ng/dL, and reported instances of increased creatinine were low (2%). A decrease in the growth of multi-drug-resistant bacteria was reported in two papers ( p = 0.065 and p = 0.04). Intravesical gentamicin seems to be an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic rUTIs. The evidence suggests it also reduces UTIs caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria with no systemic absorption and minimal renal toxicity. 2a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1