康沃尔语的正字法作为一种多中心的尝试而复兴

IF 0.4 4区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Problems & Language Planning Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1075/lplp.00056.dav
Merryn Davies-Deacon
{"title":"康沃尔语的正字法作为一种多中心的尝试而复兴","authors":"Merryn Davies-Deacon","doi":"10.1075/lplp.00056.dav","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n After over twenty years of debate over Cornish orthographies, recognition by the UK government according to the\n European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in 2003 led to the creation of what was initially intended as a “single\n written form” for use in official contexts. However, the inevitable impossibility of finding a compromise that pleased opposing\n groups of speakers with differing ideologies meant that the eventual Standard Written Form (SWF) was\n pluricentric, comprising two “main forms”. While these were initially stated to be of equal status, this has been hard to maintain\n since the SWF’s implementation: with more speakers using Middle Cornish forms, the Late Cornish forms are less visible and\n commonly believed to be subsidiary. Drawing on such perceptions, along with learning materials and other resources, this paper\n examines the status of the SWF today and offers some reflections on this unsuccessful attempt at pluricentricity in a minoritised\n language.","PeriodicalId":44345,"journal":{"name":"Language Problems & Language Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The orthography of revived Cornish as an attempt at pluricentricity\",\"authors\":\"Merryn Davies-Deacon\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lplp.00056.dav\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n After over twenty years of debate over Cornish orthographies, recognition by the UK government according to the\\n European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in 2003 led to the creation of what was initially intended as a “single\\n written form” for use in official contexts. However, the inevitable impossibility of finding a compromise that pleased opposing\\n groups of speakers with differing ideologies meant that the eventual Standard Written Form (SWF) was\\n pluricentric, comprising two “main forms”. While these were initially stated to be of equal status, this has been hard to maintain\\n since the SWF’s implementation: with more speakers using Middle Cornish forms, the Late Cornish forms are less visible and\\n commonly believed to be subsidiary. Drawing on such perceptions, along with learning materials and other resources, this paper\\n examines the status of the SWF today and offers some reflections on this unsuccessful attempt at pluricentricity in a minoritised\\n language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00056.dav\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Problems & Language Planning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00056.dav","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对康沃尔语正字法进行了20多年的争论之后,2003年,英国政府根据《欧洲地区或少数民族语言宪章》对康沃尔语的承认,创造了一种最初旨在用于官方语境的“单一书面形式”。然而,不可避免地不可能找到一种折中办法,使具有不同意识形态的对立群体满意,这意味着最终的标准书面形式(SWF)是多中心的,包括两种“主要形式”。虽然这些最初被认为是平等的,但自从SWF实施以来,这种情况很难维持:随着越来越多的人使用中康沃尔语形式,晚期康沃尔语形式就不那么明显了,通常被认为是附属的。基于这些观点,结合学习材料和其他资源,本文考察了主权财富基金今天的状况,并对这种以少数民族语言实现多中心化的失败尝试提出了一些反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The orthography of revived Cornish as an attempt at pluricentricity
After over twenty years of debate over Cornish orthographies, recognition by the UK government according to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in 2003 led to the creation of what was initially intended as a “single written form” for use in official contexts. However, the inevitable impossibility of finding a compromise that pleased opposing groups of speakers with differing ideologies meant that the eventual Standard Written Form (SWF) was pluricentric, comprising two “main forms”. While these were initially stated to be of equal status, this has been hard to maintain since the SWF’s implementation: with more speakers using Middle Cornish forms, the Late Cornish forms are less visible and commonly believed to be subsidiary. Drawing on such perceptions, along with learning materials and other resources, this paper examines the status of the SWF today and offers some reflections on this unsuccessful attempt at pluricentricity in a minoritised language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Language Problems and Language Planning is published in cooperation with the Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems. This international multi-lingual journal publishes articles primarily on political, sociological, and economic aspects of language and language use. It is especially concerned with relationships between and among language communities, particularly in international contexts, and in the adaptation, manipulation, and standardization of language for international use.
期刊最新文献
Review of Salomone (2022): The rise of English: Global politics and the power of language Review of Wright & Higgins (2021): Diversifying Family Language Policy Review of Faingold (2020): Language Rights and the Law in the European Union Translation policies in times of a pandemic Review of Barandovská-Frank (2020): Interlingvistiko. Enkonduko en la sciencon pri planlingvoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1