{"title":"芬兰内陆湖丁基锡化合物的监测和建模","authors":"H. Ahkola, J. Juntunen, K. Krogerus, T. Huttula","doi":"10.3389/fenvc.2022.1063667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we measured the total concentration of BTCs using grab water sampling, dissolved concentration with passive samplers, and particle-bound fraction with sedimentation traps in a Finnish inland lake. The sampling was conducted from May to September over two study years. In grab water samples the average concentration of MBT at sampling sites varied between 4.8 and 13 ng L−1, DBT 0.9–2.4 ng L−1, and TBT 0.4–0.8 ng L−1 during the first study year and 0.6–1.1 ng L−1, DBT 0.5–2.2 ng L−1 and TBT < LOD-0.7 ng L−1 during the second year. The average BTC concentrations determined with passive samplers varied between 0.08 and 0.53 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.10–0.14 ng L−1 for DBT and 0.05–0.07 ng L−1 for TBT during the first study year and 0.03–0.05 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.02–0.05 ng L−1 for DBT and TBT 0.007–0.013 ng L−1 during the second year. The average BTC concentrations measured in sedimented particles collected with sedimentation traps were between 1.5 and 9.0 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.61–22 ng L−1 for DBT and 0.05–1.8 ng L−1 for TBT during the first study year and 3.0–12 ng L−1 for MBT, 1.7–9.8 ng L−1 for DBT and TBT 0.4–1.2 ng L−1 during the second year. The differences between sampling techniques and the detected BTCs were obvious, e.g., tributyltin (TBT) was detected only in 4%–24% of the grab samples, 50% of the sedimentation traps, and 93% of passive samplers. The BTC concentrations measured with grab and passive sampling suggested hydrological differences between the study years. This was confirmed with flow velocity measurements. However, the annual difference was not observed in BTC concentrations measured in settled particles which suggest that only the dissolved BTC fraction varied. The extreme value analysis suggested that grab sampling and sedimentation trap sampling results contain more extreme peak values than passive sampling. However, all high concentrations are not automatically extreme values but indicates that BTCs are present in surface water in trace concentrations despite not being detected with all sampling techniques.","PeriodicalId":73082,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in environmental chemistry","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring and modelling of butyltin compounds in Finnish inland lake\",\"authors\":\"H. Ahkola, J. Juntunen, K. Krogerus, T. Huttula\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fenvc.2022.1063667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study we measured the total concentration of BTCs using grab water sampling, dissolved concentration with passive samplers, and particle-bound fraction with sedimentation traps in a Finnish inland lake. The sampling was conducted from May to September over two study years. In grab water samples the average concentration of MBT at sampling sites varied between 4.8 and 13 ng L−1, DBT 0.9–2.4 ng L−1, and TBT 0.4–0.8 ng L−1 during the first study year and 0.6–1.1 ng L−1, DBT 0.5–2.2 ng L−1 and TBT < LOD-0.7 ng L−1 during the second year. The average BTC concentrations determined with passive samplers varied between 0.08 and 0.53 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.10–0.14 ng L−1 for DBT and 0.05–0.07 ng L−1 for TBT during the first study year and 0.03–0.05 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.02–0.05 ng L−1 for DBT and TBT 0.007–0.013 ng L−1 during the second year. The average BTC concentrations measured in sedimented particles collected with sedimentation traps were between 1.5 and 9.0 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.61–22 ng L−1 for DBT and 0.05–1.8 ng L−1 for TBT during the first study year and 3.0–12 ng L−1 for MBT, 1.7–9.8 ng L−1 for DBT and TBT 0.4–1.2 ng L−1 during the second year. The differences between sampling techniques and the detected BTCs were obvious, e.g., tributyltin (TBT) was detected only in 4%–24% of the grab samples, 50% of the sedimentation traps, and 93% of passive samplers. The BTC concentrations measured with grab and passive sampling suggested hydrological differences between the study years. This was confirmed with flow velocity measurements. However, the annual difference was not observed in BTC concentrations measured in settled particles which suggest that only the dissolved BTC fraction varied. The extreme value analysis suggested that grab sampling and sedimentation trap sampling results contain more extreme peak values than passive sampling. However, all high concentrations are not automatically extreme values but indicates that BTCs are present in surface water in trace concentrations despite not being detected with all sampling techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in environmental chemistry\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in environmental chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvc.2022.1063667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in environmental chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvc.2022.1063667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这项研究中,我们测量了芬兰内陆湖中btc的总浓度,用被动采样器测量了溶解浓度,用沉淀池测量了颗粒结合分数。在为期两年的研究中,从5月到9月进行了抽样调查。在研究的第一年,各采样点的MBT平均浓度在4.8 ~ 13 ng L−1之间,DBT为0.9 ~ 2.4 ng L−1,TBT为0.4 ~ 0.8 ng L−1,第二年,DBT为0.6 ~ 1.1 ng L−1,DBT为0.5 ~ 2.2 ng L−1,TBT < lod ~ 0.7 ng L−1。在第一年的研究中,被动采样器测定的BTC平均浓度在MBT的0.08 ~ 0.53 ng L−1之间,DBT的0.10 ~ 0.14 ng L−1之间,TBT的0.05 ~ 0.07 ng L−1之间,第二年MBT的0.03 ~ 0.05 ng L−1之间,DBT的0.02 ~ 0.05 ng L−1之间,TBT的0.007 ~ 0.013 ng L−1之间。在第一年的研究中,沉淀池收集的沉积物颗粒中测量到的BTC平均浓度在MBT的1.5 ~ 9.0 ng L−1之间,DBT的0.61 ~ 22 ng L−1和TBT的0.05 ~ 1.8 ng L−1之间,第二年MBT的3.0 ~ 12 ng L−1,DBT的1.7 ~ 9.8 ng L−1和TBT的0.4 ~ 1.2 ng L−1之间。采样技术和检测到的三丁基锡之间的差异是明显的,例如,三丁基锡(TBT)仅在4%-24%的抓取样品中检测到,50%的沉淀陷阱和93%的被动采样器中检测到。抓取和被动采样测量的BTC浓度显示了研究年份之间的水文差异。流速测量证实了这一点。然而,在沉淀颗粒中测量的BTC浓度没有观察到年差异,这表明只有溶解的BTC部分变化。极值分析表明,抓斗取样和沉淀池取样结果比被动取样包含更多的极值峰值。然而,并非所有高浓度都自动成为极端值,而是表明尽管所有取样技术都未检测到,但btc仍以微量浓度存在于地表水中。
Monitoring and modelling of butyltin compounds in Finnish inland lake
In this study we measured the total concentration of BTCs using grab water sampling, dissolved concentration with passive samplers, and particle-bound fraction with sedimentation traps in a Finnish inland lake. The sampling was conducted from May to September over two study years. In grab water samples the average concentration of MBT at sampling sites varied between 4.8 and 13 ng L−1, DBT 0.9–2.4 ng L−1, and TBT 0.4–0.8 ng L−1 during the first study year and 0.6–1.1 ng L−1, DBT 0.5–2.2 ng L−1 and TBT < LOD-0.7 ng L−1 during the second year. The average BTC concentrations determined with passive samplers varied between 0.08 and 0.53 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.10–0.14 ng L−1 for DBT and 0.05–0.07 ng L−1 for TBT during the first study year and 0.03–0.05 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.02–0.05 ng L−1 for DBT and TBT 0.007–0.013 ng L−1 during the second year. The average BTC concentrations measured in sedimented particles collected with sedimentation traps were between 1.5 and 9.0 ng L−1 for MBT, 0.61–22 ng L−1 for DBT and 0.05–1.8 ng L−1 for TBT during the first study year and 3.0–12 ng L−1 for MBT, 1.7–9.8 ng L−1 for DBT and TBT 0.4–1.2 ng L−1 during the second year. The differences between sampling techniques and the detected BTCs were obvious, e.g., tributyltin (TBT) was detected only in 4%–24% of the grab samples, 50% of the sedimentation traps, and 93% of passive samplers. The BTC concentrations measured with grab and passive sampling suggested hydrological differences between the study years. This was confirmed with flow velocity measurements. However, the annual difference was not observed in BTC concentrations measured in settled particles which suggest that only the dissolved BTC fraction varied. The extreme value analysis suggested that grab sampling and sedimentation trap sampling results contain more extreme peak values than passive sampling. However, all high concentrations are not automatically extreme values but indicates that BTCs are present in surface water in trace concentrations despite not being detected with all sampling techniques.