英国代孕者的特点、经验及对代孕法律改革的看法

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES International Journal of Law Policy and the Family Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/lawfam/ebac030
Kirsty Horsey, M. Arian-Schad, N. Macklon, K. Ahuja
{"title":"英国代孕者的特点、经验及对代孕法律改革的看法","authors":"Kirsty Horsey, M. Arian-Schad, N. Macklon, K. Ahuja","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n What are surrogates’ views on their experience with surrogacy, their understanding of the law, and views on legal reform? We conducted an online retrospective survey of women who underwent treatment as gestational surrogates in two UK-regulated IVF centres between March 2014 and October 2021. Forty-seven surrogates responded outlining their experiences with surrogacy in the England/Wales legal context, their understandings of the law, and thoughts on potential law reform. The surrogates ranged in age, occupation, and household income. Most surrogates were white, British women. While almost half were family members or friends of the intended parents, the largest category met the intended parents through a non-profit surrogacy organization. Two-thirds of the respondents had given birth to a baby as a surrogate. Surrogates generally do not view themselves as the mother of the child that they carry and support proposals for reforms that would recognize the intended parents as legal parents from birth. More ambivalence is apparent in relation to expenses and payments, though advertising is generally supported. Draft new legislation is expected to be introduced in the UK in 2023, and the results of this study could inform public and parliamentary debates to come in the UK and elsewhere. Moreover, the results from this survey can assist the development of good practice models for care on the surrogate pathway.","PeriodicalId":51869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UK surrogates’ characteristics, experiences, and views on surrogacy law reform\",\"authors\":\"Kirsty Horsey, M. Arian-Schad, N. Macklon, K. Ahuja\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lawfam/ebac030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n What are surrogates’ views on their experience with surrogacy, their understanding of the law, and views on legal reform? We conducted an online retrospective survey of women who underwent treatment as gestational surrogates in two UK-regulated IVF centres between March 2014 and October 2021. Forty-seven surrogates responded outlining their experiences with surrogacy in the England/Wales legal context, their understandings of the law, and thoughts on potential law reform. The surrogates ranged in age, occupation, and household income. Most surrogates were white, British women. While almost half were family members or friends of the intended parents, the largest category met the intended parents through a non-profit surrogacy organization. Two-thirds of the respondents had given birth to a baby as a surrogate. Surrogates generally do not view themselves as the mother of the child that they carry and support proposals for reforms that would recognize the intended parents as legal parents from birth. More ambivalence is apparent in relation to expenses and payments, though advertising is generally supported. Draft new legislation is expected to be introduced in the UK in 2023, and the results of this study could inform public and parliamentary debates to come in the UK and elsewhere. Moreover, the results from this survey can assist the development of good practice models for care on the surrogate pathway.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebac030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebac030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代孕者对代孕经历、对法律的理解以及对法律改革的看法是什么?我们对2014年3月至2021年10月期间在两个英国监管的试管婴儿中心接受妊娠代孕治疗的女性进行了一项在线回顾性调查。47名代孕者做出回应,概述了他们在英格兰/威尔士法律背景下的代孕经历、对法律的理解以及对潜在法律改革的思考。代孕者的年龄、职业和家庭收入各不相同。大多数代孕者都是英国白人女性。虽然近一半是意向父母的家人或朋友,但最大的一类是通过非营利代孕组织认识意向父母的。三分之二的受访者曾代孕生过孩子。代孕者通常不认为自己是孩子的母亲,并支持改革建议,承认准父母从出生起就是合法父母。尽管广告通常得到支持,但在支出和付款方面,矛盾心理更为明显。新立法草案预计将于2023年在英国出台,这项研究的结果可能会为英国和其他地方的公众和议会辩论提供信息。此外,这项调查的结果可以帮助开发替代途径护理的良好实践模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UK surrogates’ characteristics, experiences, and views on surrogacy law reform
What are surrogates’ views on their experience with surrogacy, their understanding of the law, and views on legal reform? We conducted an online retrospective survey of women who underwent treatment as gestational surrogates in two UK-regulated IVF centres between March 2014 and October 2021. Forty-seven surrogates responded outlining their experiences with surrogacy in the England/Wales legal context, their understandings of the law, and thoughts on potential law reform. The surrogates ranged in age, occupation, and household income. Most surrogates were white, British women. While almost half were family members or friends of the intended parents, the largest category met the intended parents through a non-profit surrogacy organization. Two-thirds of the respondents had given birth to a baby as a surrogate. Surrogates generally do not view themselves as the mother of the child that they carry and support proposals for reforms that would recognize the intended parents as legal parents from birth. More ambivalence is apparent in relation to expenses and payments, though advertising is generally supported. Draft new legislation is expected to be introduced in the UK in 2023, and the results of this study could inform public and parliamentary debates to come in the UK and elsewhere. Moreover, the results from this survey can assist the development of good practice models for care on the surrogate pathway.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The subject matter of the International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family comprises the following: - Analyses of the law relating to the family which carry an interest beyond the jurisdiction dealt with, or which are of a comparative nature - Theoretical analyses of family law - Sociological literature concerning the family which is of special interest to law and legal policy - Social policy literature of special interest to law and the family - Literature in related disciplines (such as medicine, psychology, demography) which is of special relevance to law and the family - Research findings in the above areas, reviews of books and relevant reports The journal has a flexible policy as to length of contributions, so that substantial research reports can be included.
期刊最新文献
Surrogates’, intended parents’, and professionals’ perspectives on ways to improve access to surrogacy in Australia Introducing a randomized controlled trial into Family Proceedings: Describing the ‘how?’ and defending the ‘why?’ The expert witness—psychologists and judicial gatekeepers in the family court Individual realities and legal responsibilities: a study of non-resident parents who dispute child maintenance obligations in Swedish administrative courts, 2014–2019 Healthcare Decision Making for Children in Singapore: The Missing Chapter in Comparison with English Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1