恐怖电影和电视的新兴趋势:上

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10436928.2022.2075179
Karen J. Renner
{"title":"恐怖电影和电视的新兴趋势:上","authors":"Karen J. Renner","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2022.2075179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is impossible to keep on top of the horror films being produced these days. Not only are platforms like Netflix and Prime creating their own content, but they are also making a wide array of international fare available to viewers. Now more than ever we need scholarship that can apprise us of significant developments in the genre. The first set of essays in this special collection, Emerging Trends in Horror Film and Television, encourages us to rethink a range of presumptions and practices that may limit horror criticism: the conflation of horror and the Gothic, the treatment of narrative innovations as resulting from cultural change rather than economic motives, the prioritization of national identities over regional ones, and the tendency to favor ideological critiques over analyses of aesthetic choices. Together, these essays chart out important new directions for future scholarship. In his essay, “Contemporary Gothic Horror Cinema: The Imagined Pasts and Traumatic Ghosts of Crimson Peak (2015) and The Woman in Black (2012),” Xavier Aldana Reyes reminds us of the enduring influence of the Gothic horror film, which he claims is due to its ability to comment on present issues despite—and, in fact, because of—its focus on the past. Aldana Reyes argues that power of the Gothic film comes from its ability to pit “present values, beliefs, and behaviors against those of previous times” (83). Whereas science fiction projects problematic aspects of our culture into the future, showing the dangerous results that may come of them, Gothic horror traces contemporary issues back in time, thereby linking problematic current views and behaviors to an outdated past. Crimson Peak, according to Aldana Reyes, uses its early-twentieth-century setting “to channel ideas of women’s rights and female empowerment” relevant to today (86). The Woman in Black, by contrast, “recasts the ghost as a metaphor for psychological instability and the difficulty of overcoming the loss of a loved one” (87). Aldana Reyes also seeks to untangle the terms “Gothic” and “horror,” which are far too frequently conflated. He argues that, unlike the diffuse category of horror, the Gothic invokes a recognizable aesthetic, which, in turn, is linked to certain devices (e.g., doppelgängers), themes (e.g., the corruption of the aristocracy), and plot","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"33 1","pages":"79 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging Trends in Horror Film and Television: Part 1\",\"authors\":\"Karen J. Renner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10436928.2022.2075179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is impossible to keep on top of the horror films being produced these days. Not only are platforms like Netflix and Prime creating their own content, but they are also making a wide array of international fare available to viewers. Now more than ever we need scholarship that can apprise us of significant developments in the genre. The first set of essays in this special collection, Emerging Trends in Horror Film and Television, encourages us to rethink a range of presumptions and practices that may limit horror criticism: the conflation of horror and the Gothic, the treatment of narrative innovations as resulting from cultural change rather than economic motives, the prioritization of national identities over regional ones, and the tendency to favor ideological critiques over analyses of aesthetic choices. Together, these essays chart out important new directions for future scholarship. In his essay, “Contemporary Gothic Horror Cinema: The Imagined Pasts and Traumatic Ghosts of Crimson Peak (2015) and The Woman in Black (2012),” Xavier Aldana Reyes reminds us of the enduring influence of the Gothic horror film, which he claims is due to its ability to comment on present issues despite—and, in fact, because of—its focus on the past. Aldana Reyes argues that power of the Gothic film comes from its ability to pit “present values, beliefs, and behaviors against those of previous times” (83). Whereas science fiction projects problematic aspects of our culture into the future, showing the dangerous results that may come of them, Gothic horror traces contemporary issues back in time, thereby linking problematic current views and behaviors to an outdated past. Crimson Peak, according to Aldana Reyes, uses its early-twentieth-century setting “to channel ideas of women’s rights and female empowerment” relevant to today (86). The Woman in Black, by contrast, “recasts the ghost as a metaphor for psychological instability and the difficulty of overcoming the loss of a loved one” (87). Aldana Reyes also seeks to untangle the terms “Gothic” and “horror,” which are far too frequently conflated. He argues that, unlike the diffuse category of horror, the Gothic invokes a recognizable aesthetic, which, in turn, is linked to certain devices (e.g., doppelgängers), themes (e.g., the corruption of the aristocracy), and plot\",\"PeriodicalId\":42717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"79 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2022.2075179\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2022.2075179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现在要想跟上正在制作的恐怖电影的进度是不可能的。Netflix和Prime等平台不仅在创建自己的内容,而且还向观众提供了广泛的国际节目。现在,我们比以往任何时候都更需要能够让我们了解这一流派的重大发展的学术。本特辑中的第一组文章《恐怖电影和电视的新兴趋势》鼓励我们重新思考一系列可能限制恐怖批评的假设和实践:将恐怖与哥特式混为一谈,将叙事创新视为文化变革而非经济动机,将国家身份置于地区身份之上,以及倾向于意识形态批判而非对审美选择的分析。这些文章共同为未来的学术研究指明了重要的新方向。Xavier Aldana Reyes在他的文章《当代哥特式恐怖电影:深红峰的想象糕点和创伤幽灵》(2015年)和《黑衣女人》(2012年)中提醒我们哥特式恐怖电影的持久影响,他声称这是因为它能够评论当前问题,尽管——事实上,也是因为——它关注过去。阿尔达纳·雷耶斯认为,哥特式电影的力量来自于它将“当前的价值观、信仰和行为与以前的时代相比较”的能力(83)。科幻小说将我们文化中有问题的方面投射到未来,展示了它们可能带来的危险结果,而哥特式恐怖则将当代问题追溯到了过去,从而将有问题的当前观点和行为与过时的过去联系起来。根据Aldana Reyes的说法,深红峰利用其20世纪初的背景“传播与当今相关的妇女权利和妇女赋权思想”(86)。相比之下,《黑衣女人》“将鬼魂重塑为心理不稳定和克服失去亲人的困难的隐喻”(87)。阿尔达纳·雷耶斯还试图解开“哥特式”和“恐怖”这两个经常被混为一谈的术语。他认为,与弥漫的恐怖类别不同,哥特式唤起了一种可识别的美学,而这种美学又与某些装置(如替身)、主题(如贵族的腐败)和情节有关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emerging Trends in Horror Film and Television: Part 1
It is impossible to keep on top of the horror films being produced these days. Not only are platforms like Netflix and Prime creating their own content, but they are also making a wide array of international fare available to viewers. Now more than ever we need scholarship that can apprise us of significant developments in the genre. The first set of essays in this special collection, Emerging Trends in Horror Film and Television, encourages us to rethink a range of presumptions and practices that may limit horror criticism: the conflation of horror and the Gothic, the treatment of narrative innovations as resulting from cultural change rather than economic motives, the prioritization of national identities over regional ones, and the tendency to favor ideological critiques over analyses of aesthetic choices. Together, these essays chart out important new directions for future scholarship. In his essay, “Contemporary Gothic Horror Cinema: The Imagined Pasts and Traumatic Ghosts of Crimson Peak (2015) and The Woman in Black (2012),” Xavier Aldana Reyes reminds us of the enduring influence of the Gothic horror film, which he claims is due to its ability to comment on present issues despite—and, in fact, because of—its focus on the past. Aldana Reyes argues that power of the Gothic film comes from its ability to pit “present values, beliefs, and behaviors against those of previous times” (83). Whereas science fiction projects problematic aspects of our culture into the future, showing the dangerous results that may come of them, Gothic horror traces contemporary issues back in time, thereby linking problematic current views and behaviors to an outdated past. Crimson Peak, according to Aldana Reyes, uses its early-twentieth-century setting “to channel ideas of women’s rights and female empowerment” relevant to today (86). The Woman in Black, by contrast, “recasts the ghost as a metaphor for psychological instability and the difficulty of overcoming the loss of a loved one” (87). Aldana Reyes also seeks to untangle the terms “Gothic” and “horror,” which are far too frequently conflated. He argues that, unlike the diffuse category of horror, the Gothic invokes a recognizable aesthetic, which, in turn, is linked to certain devices (e.g., doppelgängers), themes (e.g., the corruption of the aristocracy), and plot
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Alex as the Product, Producer, and Consumer of Art in the Dilapidated State, in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Friendship and Art in Valerie Martin’s I Give It to You Reading As Conversation with the Overarching Blended Author (Or Roberto Bolaño): Joint Attention, Immersion, and Interaction The Objects of Jane Gardam The Book, Meaning, and Densities of Essential Forms in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1