记住他者,重新定位自己:肇事者和合作者后代纪录片中的传记权和自动传播权*

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Social Semiotics Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/10350330.2022.2158620
C. Demaria, M. Panico
{"title":"记住他者,重新定位自己:肇事者和合作者后代纪录片中的传记权和自动传播权*","authors":"C. Demaria, M. Panico","doi":"10.1080/10350330.2022.2158620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Can the perpetrator or the collaborator “speak”? How, and for whom? Do they have a “right to a biography” and, if so, what are the terms of this right? Who can speak for them? In short, what does it mean to work through their lives and the crimes they committed for those who decide to tell their stories? The main goal of this paper is to answer these questions using a particular kind of documentary directed by those who, in a certain moment of their lives, have discovered that a member of their families was a perpetrator or a collaborator relating to a dictatorship. Using Lotman’s theory of culture and memory, we discuss the positionalities of those who “wrote” these documentaries, located constantly between the individual and the collective semiosphere. Taking into account two case studies – El pacto de Adriana directed by Lissette Orozco (Chile, 2017) and L’occhio di vetro directed by Duccio Charini (Italy, 2020) – we look at the mechanisms of investigation and recollection that they use and “show,” in order to elucidate family secrets within the broader contexts of the collective traumas of Chile’s and Italy’s post-conflict societies.","PeriodicalId":21775,"journal":{"name":"Social Semiotics","volume":"32 1","pages":"689 - 707"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remembering the other, repositioning oneself: the right to a biography and autocommunication in perpetrator and collaborator descendant documentaries*\",\"authors\":\"C. Demaria, M. Panico\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10350330.2022.2158620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Can the perpetrator or the collaborator “speak”? How, and for whom? Do they have a “right to a biography” and, if so, what are the terms of this right? Who can speak for them? In short, what does it mean to work through their lives and the crimes they committed for those who decide to tell their stories? The main goal of this paper is to answer these questions using a particular kind of documentary directed by those who, in a certain moment of their lives, have discovered that a member of their families was a perpetrator or a collaborator relating to a dictatorship. Using Lotman’s theory of culture and memory, we discuss the positionalities of those who “wrote” these documentaries, located constantly between the individual and the collective semiosphere. Taking into account two case studies – El pacto de Adriana directed by Lissette Orozco (Chile, 2017) and L’occhio di vetro directed by Duccio Charini (Italy, 2020) – we look at the mechanisms of investigation and recollection that they use and “show,” in order to elucidate family secrets within the broader contexts of the collective traumas of Chile’s and Italy’s post-conflict societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Semiotics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"689 - 707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Semiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2158620\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2158620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为人或同谋者能“说话”吗?怎么做,为谁做?他们有“获得传记的权利”吗?如果有,这项权利的条款是什么?谁能为他们说话?简而言之,对于那些决定讲述他们的故事的人来说,研究他们的生活和他们犯下的罪行意味着什么?本文的主要目的是通过一种特殊的纪录片来回答这些问题,这些纪录片是由那些在他们生命的某个时刻发现他们的家庭成员是与独裁有关的犯罪者或合作者的人导演的。利用洛特曼的文化和记忆理论,我们讨论了那些“写”这些纪录片的人的位置,他们不断地位于个人和集体的符号圈之间。考虑到两个案例研究——Lissette Orozco导演的El pacto de Adriana(智利,2017年)和Duccio Charini导演的L’occhio di vetro(意大利,2020年)——我们研究了他们使用和“展示”的调查和回忆机制,以便在智利和意大利冲突后社会的集体创伤的更广泛背景下阐明家庭秘密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remembering the other, repositioning oneself: the right to a biography and autocommunication in perpetrator and collaborator descendant documentaries*
ABSTRACT Can the perpetrator or the collaborator “speak”? How, and for whom? Do they have a “right to a biography” and, if so, what are the terms of this right? Who can speak for them? In short, what does it mean to work through their lives and the crimes they committed for those who decide to tell their stories? The main goal of this paper is to answer these questions using a particular kind of documentary directed by those who, in a certain moment of their lives, have discovered that a member of their families was a perpetrator or a collaborator relating to a dictatorship. Using Lotman’s theory of culture and memory, we discuss the positionalities of those who “wrote” these documentaries, located constantly between the individual and the collective semiosphere. Taking into account two case studies – El pacto de Adriana directed by Lissette Orozco (Chile, 2017) and L’occhio di vetro directed by Duccio Charini (Italy, 2020) – we look at the mechanisms of investigation and recollection that they use and “show,” in order to elucidate family secrets within the broader contexts of the collective traumas of Chile’s and Italy’s post-conflict societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Semiotics
Social Semiotics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: a social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments The communicative linguistic landscape: Production formats and designed environments An introduction to language and social justice: what is, what has been, and what could be Harnessing comics as minoritarian interventions in the representation of conflicts and their everyday: the case of Vanni and Welcome to the New World Paratextual mediation and (re)framed narratives: a case study of Ganxiao liuji
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1