不是理论,也不是科学——论哲学的阐发

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Revista de Filosofia Aurora Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds02
Guadalupe Reinoso
{"title":"不是理论,也不是科学——论哲学的阐发","authors":"Guadalupe Reinoso","doi":"10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Wittgenstein’s philosophical reflection on philosophy: its method, its scope, and its relationship with other knowledge as central elements of the philosophical proposal the author developed in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Therefore, my proposal is to rehearse a metaphilosophical reading of Wittgenstein’s remarks about philosophy in TLP focusing, on the one hand, on his reflections on philosophy as an activity and not as a theory; on the other hand, on his categorical differentiation established between philosophical elucidations and scientific explanations. \nThis proposal differs from the readings that interpret it is through the construction of a theory of meaning -or logical doctrine- that one can distinguish philosophical nonsense and see the world correctly. It also differs from Tractatus’s non-theoretical or quietist readings which understand philosophical elucidations as exclusively negative or critical nonsense. My aim is to highlight a positive aspect of philosophical elucidations that I will call performative. From my metaphilosophical reading, not only does the activity of clarification work as a critical sieve that separates what makes sense from what does not –with no theory; but it also makes a modification -a transformation- in the one who establishes it. These performative aspects imply emphasizing that there is a change in the way we see the world but also in the way we ‘see’ language, meaning, logic, science, philosophy, life, etc. Thus, the refusal to elaborate a theory or to offer scientific explanations does not turn the philosophical elucidations in TLP into a mode of self-destructive attack on all kinds of philosophy. On the contrary, these elucidations are part of the defense of a particular way of practicing it.","PeriodicalId":52002,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Filosofia Aurora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neither Theory nor Science Metaphilosophical Remarks on Philosophical Elucidations\",\"authors\":\"Guadalupe Reinoso\",\"doi\":\"10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines Wittgenstein’s philosophical reflection on philosophy: its method, its scope, and its relationship with other knowledge as central elements of the philosophical proposal the author developed in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Therefore, my proposal is to rehearse a metaphilosophical reading of Wittgenstein’s remarks about philosophy in TLP focusing, on the one hand, on his reflections on philosophy as an activity and not as a theory; on the other hand, on his categorical differentiation established between philosophical elucidations and scientific explanations. \\nThis proposal differs from the readings that interpret it is through the construction of a theory of meaning -or logical doctrine- that one can distinguish philosophical nonsense and see the world correctly. It also differs from Tractatus’s non-theoretical or quietist readings which understand philosophical elucidations as exclusively negative or critical nonsense. My aim is to highlight a positive aspect of philosophical elucidations that I will call performative. From my metaphilosophical reading, not only does the activity of clarification work as a critical sieve that separates what makes sense from what does not –with no theory; but it also makes a modification -a transformation- in the one who establishes it. These performative aspects imply emphasizing that there is a change in the way we see the world but also in the way we ‘see’ language, meaning, logic, science, philosophy, life, etc. Thus, the refusal to elaborate a theory or to offer scientific explanations does not turn the philosophical elucidations in TLP into a mode of self-destructive attack on all kinds of philosophy. On the contrary, these elucidations are part of the defense of a particular way of practicing it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Filosofia Aurora\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Filosofia Aurora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Filosofia Aurora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了维特根斯坦对哲学的哲学反思:它的方法,它的范围,以及它与其他知识的关系,作为作者在《逻辑哲学论》中发展的哲学建议的中心要素。因此,我的建议是对维特根斯坦在《TLP》中关于哲学的评论进行一种形而上学的解读,一方面,关注他对哲学作为一种活动而不是一种理论的思考;另一方面,他对哲学阐释和科学解释进行了绝对区分。这一建议不同于解读它的解读,它是通过构建意义理论或逻辑学说,人们可以区分哲学上的废话,并正确地看待世界。它也不同于Tractatus的非理论或安静主义解读,后者将哲学阐释理解为完全否定或批判的废话。我的目的是强调哲学阐释的积极方面,我称之为表演。从我的形而上学阅读来看,澄清活动不仅是一个关键的筛子,将有意义的东西与没有意义的东西分开——没有理论;但它也使建立它的人发生了改变——一种转变。这些表现方面意味着强调我们看待世界的方式发生了变化,而且我们“看待”语言、意义、逻辑、科学、哲学、生活等的方式也发生了变化。因此,拒绝阐述一种理论或提供科学解释,并没有把《TLP》中的哲学阐释变成一种对各种哲学进行自我毁灭攻击的模式。相反,这些阐释是为实践它的特定方式辩护的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neither Theory nor Science Metaphilosophical Remarks on Philosophical Elucidations
This article examines Wittgenstein’s philosophical reflection on philosophy: its method, its scope, and its relationship with other knowledge as central elements of the philosophical proposal the author developed in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Therefore, my proposal is to rehearse a metaphilosophical reading of Wittgenstein’s remarks about philosophy in TLP focusing, on the one hand, on his reflections on philosophy as an activity and not as a theory; on the other hand, on his categorical differentiation established between philosophical elucidations and scientific explanations. This proposal differs from the readings that interpret it is through the construction of a theory of meaning -or logical doctrine- that one can distinguish philosophical nonsense and see the world correctly. It also differs from Tractatus’s non-theoretical or quietist readings which understand philosophical elucidations as exclusively negative or critical nonsense. My aim is to highlight a positive aspect of philosophical elucidations that I will call performative. From my metaphilosophical reading, not only does the activity of clarification work as a critical sieve that separates what makes sense from what does not –with no theory; but it also makes a modification -a transformation- in the one who establishes it. These performative aspects imply emphasizing that there is a change in the way we see the world but also in the way we ‘see’ language, meaning, logic, science, philosophy, life, etc. Thus, the refusal to elaborate a theory or to offer scientific explanations does not turn the philosophical elucidations in TLP into a mode of self-destructive attack on all kinds of philosophy. On the contrary, these elucidations are part of the defense of a particular way of practicing it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Filosofia: Aurora (Qualis A2) is a quarterly publication of the Graduate Program in Philosophy of the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR). It has published, since 1988, research findings with the purpose of contributing to the training and activity of philosophers and other professionals in related fields. The Revista de Filosofia Aurora (Journal of Philosophy Aurora) publishes scientific articles, reviews, and interviews by adopting the peer review process among members of the editorial board and the specialized scientific community in a double-blind review, i.e., both the names of the reviewers and of the authors are not disclosed. The abbreviated title of the journal is Rev. Filos. Aurora and it is used in bibliographies, references, footnotes, and bibliographic legends.
期刊最新文献
canto da sereIA Por uma etnografia do poder na inteligência artificial, no capitalismo de vigilância e no colonialismo digital Devir, rizoma e transversalidade em Cyberpunk 2077 IAs Generativas Sobre Superman em Super Pride
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1