失业对在职医疗补助受益人的心理健康产生负面影响

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1108/jpmh-12-2022-0127
Yixuan Li, S. Zeger, A. Elmi, M. Wilder, M. Mccarthy
{"title":"失业对在职医疗补助受益人的心理健康产生负面影响","authors":"Yixuan Li, S. Zeger, A. Elmi, M. Wilder, M. Mccarthy","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-12-2022-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nFew have studied the relationship between employment and health in the Medicaid population. The purpose of this study is to estimate the impact of job loss on the mental health of working Medicaid beneficiaries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study conducted a post hoc analysis of 1,538 adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in a prospective cohort study. The authors matched participants who lost their job to participants who remained employed based on demographics, illness severity and social determinants of health. The authors estimated the effect of job loss on the odds of a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety and self-reported mental health during a one-year follow-up period, stratified by prior history of depression and/or anxiety as documented in the Medicaid claims.\n\n\nFindings\nAmong participants with no preexisting depression or anxiety, the incidence of depression or anxiety was 17% versus 7% (aOR = 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.88 to 4.34) between those who lost versus kept their job, respectively, and the mean difference in self-reported mental health was −4.3 (95% CI: −6.02 to −2.58). Self-reported mental health was also poorer between those who lost versus kept their job among participants with preexisting depression and/or anxiety (x = −4.78 (95% CI: −8.90 to −0.66).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nLimitations of this study are as follows: we may not have matched on all factors that influence retaining a job; we do not distinguish between involuntary and voluntary job loss; generalizability is limited; and employment information is based on self-report.\n\n\nPractical implications\nOur society should invest more resources into supporting low-wage workers such as Medicaid beneficiaries.\n\n\nSocial implications\nActive labor policies that connect people to jobs, help them retain their job and support skills training to secure a better quality job, could reduce health disparities in the Medicaid population.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUse of both claims and self-reported mental health information to evaluate the impact of job loss on working Medicaid beneficiaries.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job loss negatively impacts the mental health of working Medicaid beneficiaries\",\"authors\":\"Yixuan Li, S. Zeger, A. Elmi, M. Wilder, M. Mccarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpmh-12-2022-0127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nFew have studied the relationship between employment and health in the Medicaid population. The purpose of this study is to estimate the impact of job loss on the mental health of working Medicaid beneficiaries.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study conducted a post hoc analysis of 1,538 adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in a prospective cohort study. The authors matched participants who lost their job to participants who remained employed based on demographics, illness severity and social determinants of health. The authors estimated the effect of job loss on the odds of a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety and self-reported mental health during a one-year follow-up period, stratified by prior history of depression and/or anxiety as documented in the Medicaid claims.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAmong participants with no preexisting depression or anxiety, the incidence of depression or anxiety was 17% versus 7% (aOR = 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.88 to 4.34) between those who lost versus kept their job, respectively, and the mean difference in self-reported mental health was −4.3 (95% CI: −6.02 to −2.58). Self-reported mental health was also poorer between those who lost versus kept their job among participants with preexisting depression and/or anxiety (x = −4.78 (95% CI: −8.90 to −0.66).\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nLimitations of this study are as follows: we may not have matched on all factors that influence retaining a job; we do not distinguish between involuntary and voluntary job loss; generalizability is limited; and employment information is based on self-report.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nOur society should invest more resources into supporting low-wage workers such as Medicaid beneficiaries.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nActive labor policies that connect people to jobs, help them retain their job and support skills training to secure a better quality job, could reduce health disparities in the Medicaid population.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nUse of both claims and self-reported mental health information to evaluate the impact of job loss on working Medicaid beneficiaries.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-12-2022-0127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-12-2022-0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的很少有人研究医疗补助人群的就业与健康之间的关系。本研究的目的是评估失业对在职医疗补助受益人心理健康的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究对参与前瞻性队列研究的1538名成年医疗补助受益人进行了事后分析。作者根据人口统计、疾病严重程度和健康的社会决定因素,将失业的参与者与仍在工作的参与者进行了匹配。作者估计了在一年的随访期内,失业对诊断为抑郁症和/或焦虑症的几率以及自我报告的心理健康的影响,并根据医疗补助申请中记录的抑郁症和/或者焦虑症的既往史进行了分层。发现在没有预先存在抑郁或焦虑的参与者中,失业者和保住工作者的抑郁或焦虑发生率分别为17%和7%(aOR=2.85;95%置信区间(CI):1.88至4.34),自我报告的心理健康的平均差异为−4.3(95%置信区间:−6.02至−2.58)。在先前患有抑郁症和/或焦虑症的参与者中,失业者和保住工作者的自我报告心理健康也较差(x=−4.78(95%可信区间:−8.90至−0.66)。本研究的研究局限性/含义如下:我们可能在所有方面都不匹配影响保住工作的因素;我们不区分非自愿和自愿失业;可推广性有限;就业信息基于自我报告。实际意义我们的社会应该投入更多的资源来支持像医疗补助受益人这样的低工资工人。社会影响积极的劳工政策将人们与工作联系起来,帮助他们保住工作,并支持技能培训,以确保获得更高质量的工作,这可以减少医疗补助人群的健康差距。独创性/价值利用索赔和自我报告的心理健康信息来评估失业对在职医疗补助受益人的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Job loss negatively impacts the mental health of working Medicaid beneficiaries
Purpose Few have studied the relationship between employment and health in the Medicaid population. The purpose of this study is to estimate the impact of job loss on the mental health of working Medicaid beneficiaries. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted a post hoc analysis of 1,538 adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in a prospective cohort study. The authors matched participants who lost their job to participants who remained employed based on demographics, illness severity and social determinants of health. The authors estimated the effect of job loss on the odds of a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety and self-reported mental health during a one-year follow-up period, stratified by prior history of depression and/or anxiety as documented in the Medicaid claims. Findings Among participants with no preexisting depression or anxiety, the incidence of depression or anxiety was 17% versus 7% (aOR = 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.88 to 4.34) between those who lost versus kept their job, respectively, and the mean difference in self-reported mental health was −4.3 (95% CI: −6.02 to −2.58). Self-reported mental health was also poorer between those who lost versus kept their job among participants with preexisting depression and/or anxiety (x = −4.78 (95% CI: −8.90 to −0.66). Research limitations/implications Limitations of this study are as follows: we may not have matched on all factors that influence retaining a job; we do not distinguish between involuntary and voluntary job loss; generalizability is limited; and employment information is based on self-report. Practical implications Our society should invest more resources into supporting low-wage workers such as Medicaid beneficiaries. Social implications Active labor policies that connect people to jobs, help them retain their job and support skills training to secure a better quality job, could reduce health disparities in the Medicaid population. Originality/value Use of both claims and self-reported mental health information to evaluate the impact of job loss on working Medicaid beneficiaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Overcoming challenges of embedding child and youth mental health research in community NHS services Psychological wellbeing and avoidance strategies as moderators between excessive social media use and academic performance among Indian college students Pain and associated functional impairment in the Danish general population: the role of mental well-being Impact of nature on the mental health and well-being of the ICU survivors: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Public mental health and wellbeing interventions delivered by allied health professionals (AHPs): mapping the evidence and identification of gaps. A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1