新冠肺炎相关偏见对比分析:美国、西班牙、意大利和新西兰

IF 1.9 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Research Reports Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI:10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371
S. Croucher, T. Nguyen, E. Pearson, N. Murray, Angela Feekery, Anthony Spencer, Oscar Gomez, D. Girardelli, S. Kelly
{"title":"新冠肺炎相关偏见对比分析:美国、西班牙、意大利和新西兰","authors":"S. Croucher, T. Nguyen, E. Pearson, N. Murray, Angela Feekery, Anthony Spencer, Oscar Gomez, D. Girardelli, S. Kelly","doi":"10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following the global outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), different countries took different approaches to informing their citizens about the pandemic and planned local public health initiatives. We use online participant panels in 4 affected countries – the US, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand – to explore the extent to which prejudice to Asian ethnic groups differed in these countries during the first wave of the pandemic. We argue that New Zealand’s lower scores on most indices of prejudice can be understood in part due to New Zealand’s cohesive, centralized government response to the pandemic that started early, included clear stages of response, and was led consistently by an a-political, public health and facts-base framing.","PeriodicalId":47084,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of Covid-19-related prejudice: the United States, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"S. Croucher, T. Nguyen, E. Pearson, N. Murray, Angela Feekery, Anthony Spencer, Oscar Gomez, D. Girardelli, S. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Following the global outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), different countries took different approaches to informing their citizens about the pandemic and planned local public health initiatives. We use online participant panels in 4 affected countries – the US, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand – to explore the extent to which prejudice to Asian ethnic groups differed in these countries during the first wave of the pandemic. We argue that New Zealand’s lower scores on most indices of prejudice can be understood in part due to New Zealand’s cohesive, centralized government response to the pandemic that started early, included clear stages of response, and was led consistently by an a-political, public health and facts-base framing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Research Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)在全球爆发后,不同国家采取了不同的方法向本国公民通报疫情,并计划采取当地公共卫生举措。我们在4个受影响国家——美国、西班牙、意大利和新西兰——使用在线参与者小组,探讨在第一波疫情期间,这些国家对亚裔群体的偏见差异程度。我们认为,新西兰在大多数偏见指数上的得分较低,部分原因是新西兰政府对疫情的集中一致的应对措施很早就开始了,包括明确的应对阶段,并始终由a政治、公共卫生和事实基础框架领导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative analysis of Covid-19-related prejudice: the United States, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand
ABSTRACT Following the global outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), different countries took different approaches to informing their citizens about the pandemic and planned local public health initiatives. We use online participant panels in 4 affected countries – the US, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand – to explore the extent to which prejudice to Asian ethnic groups differed in these countries during the first wave of the pandemic. We argue that New Zealand’s lower scores on most indices of prejudice can be understood in part due to New Zealand’s cohesive, centralized government response to the pandemic that started early, included clear stages of response, and was led consistently by an a-political, public health and facts-base framing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Extending the communication during sexual activity model: what role does sexual communication self-efficacy play? Conflict styles within individualistic, low power distance, and low context nations: a four nation comparison Science terms elicit ideological differences in message processing Words, words, words: participants do not read consent forms in communication research Development and validation of the commitment to social activism scale using the Thurstone scaling procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1