M. Nowak, P. Śleszyński, A. Ostrowska, Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel, Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka, Andrei Mitrea
{"title":"从法院对建筑条件的裁决看规划纠纷。以波兰为例","authors":"M. Nowak, P. Śleszyński, A. Ostrowska, Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel, Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka, Andrei Mitrea","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Our main aim is to identify the key features of spatial disputes concerning decisions on building conditions that concluded with a court decision. Parties to such planning disputes, directions of court decisions and territorial regularities were all identified. Both the database of administrative rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court (391 judgments in 205 municipalities) and data on local spatial planning documents (2.5 million decisions in 2,477 municipalities in Poland) were used. The results show that the initiators of planning disputes concluded in court are mainly property owners and their neighbours. Courts are more likely to uphold an investor’s complaint.","PeriodicalId":54201,"journal":{"name":"Planning Practice and Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"425 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning disputes from the perspective of court rulings on building conditions. A case study of Poland\",\"authors\":\"M. Nowak, P. Śleszyński, A. Ostrowska, Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel, Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka, Andrei Mitrea\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Our main aim is to identify the key features of spatial disputes concerning decisions on building conditions that concluded with a court decision. Parties to such planning disputes, directions of court decisions and territorial regularities were all identified. Both the database of administrative rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court (391 judgments in 205 municipalities) and data on local spatial planning documents (2.5 million decisions in 2,477 municipalities in Poland) were used. The results show that the initiators of planning disputes concluded in court are mainly property owners and their neighbours. Courts are more likely to uphold an investor’s complaint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"425 - 446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Planning disputes from the perspective of court rulings on building conditions. A case study of Poland
ABSTRACT Our main aim is to identify the key features of spatial disputes concerning decisions on building conditions that concluded with a court decision. Parties to such planning disputes, directions of court decisions and territorial regularities were all identified. Both the database of administrative rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court (391 judgments in 205 municipalities) and data on local spatial planning documents (2.5 million decisions in 2,477 municipalities in Poland) were used. The results show that the initiators of planning disputes concluded in court are mainly property owners and their neighbours. Courts are more likely to uphold an investor’s complaint.
期刊介绍:
Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice