E. Lopes, L. L. Soares, L. R. R. Caldas, M. S. Cerqueira, J. Marins, M. Albuquerque, M. A. Carneiro-Júnior
{"title":"中老年妇女生物阻抗和皮肤皱褶估算体脂率的有效性","authors":"E. Lopes, L. L. Soares, L. R. R. Caldas, M. S. Cerqueira, J. Marins, M. Albuquerque, M. A. Carneiro-Júnior","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Verify the validity of electrical bioimpedance (BIA) and the skinfold method in estimating the percentage of body fat (% BF) in middle-aged and elderly women, using dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. Material and methods: The sample consisted of 106 volunteers (middle age, n = 58 [51.3 ± 4.9 years] and elderly, n = 48 [67.2 ± 5.8 years]). The volunteers were submitted to anthropometric assessments and the % BF was subsequently calculated using the Jackson and Pollock 7 skinfold protocol (7SF). The % BF was also measured using BIA and DXA. Pearson’s correlation, Bland and Altman method, effect size and repeated-measure t-test were used to test the hypotheses. Results: Although there is a moderate positive relationship between the methods evaluated for middle-aged women (DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.67; DXA vs BIA, r = 0.62) and moderate to strong for the elderly (DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.57; DXA vs BIA, r = 0.75) (p ≤ 0.05 in all analyzes), the agreement between the methods was weak (limits of agreement > ± 3.5%). Additionally, when assessing the % BF mean using each method within the groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference between the estimates only between DXA and Pollock 7SF in the elderly group. Conclusion: Therefore, both the 7SF method and the BIA are not valid for estimating body fat in the sample evaluated. It is necessary to develop equations for specific skinfolds to estimate the % BF of middle-aged and elderly women and review the equations used by the BIA.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the estimated body fat percentage by bioimpedance and skinfolds in middle-aged and elderly women\",\"authors\":\"E. Lopes, L. L. Soares, L. R. R. Caldas, M. S. Cerqueira, J. Marins, M. Albuquerque, M. A. Carneiro-Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Verify the validity of electrical bioimpedance (BIA) and the skinfold method in estimating the percentage of body fat (% BF) in middle-aged and elderly women, using dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. Material and methods: The sample consisted of 106 volunteers (middle age, n = 58 [51.3 ± 4.9 years] and elderly, n = 48 [67.2 ± 5.8 years]). The volunteers were submitted to anthropometric assessments and the % BF was subsequently calculated using the Jackson and Pollock 7 skinfold protocol (7SF). The % BF was also measured using BIA and DXA. Pearson’s correlation, Bland and Altman method, effect size and repeated-measure t-test were used to test the hypotheses. Results: Although there is a moderate positive relationship between the methods evaluated for middle-aged women (DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.67; DXA vs BIA, r = 0.62) and moderate to strong for the elderly (DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.57; DXA vs BIA, r = 0.75) (p ≤ 0.05 in all analyzes), the agreement between the methods was weak (limits of agreement > ± 3.5%). Additionally, when assessing the % BF mean using each method within the groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference between the estimates only between DXA and Pollock 7SF in the elderly group. Conclusion: Therefore, both the 7SF method and the BIA are not valid for estimating body fat in the sample evaluated. It is necessary to develop equations for specific skinfolds to estimate the % BF of middle-aged and elderly women and review the equations used by the BIA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:以双发射x线吸收仪(DXA)作为参考方法,验证电生物阻抗法(BIA)和皮褶法估算中老年妇女体脂率(% BF)的有效性。材料与方法:共106例志愿者,其中中年58例[51.3±4.9岁],老年48例[67.2±5.8岁]。志愿者接受人体测量评估,随后使用Jackson和Pollock 7皮肤褶协议(7SF)计算BF %。同时用BIA和DXA测定BF %。采用Pearson相关、Bland和Altman方法、效应大小和重复测量t检验对假设进行检验。结果:尽管对中年妇女评估的方法之间存在中度正相关(DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.67;DXA vs BIA, r = 0.62),中重度老年人(DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.57;DXA vs BIA, r = 0.75)(所有分析均p≤0.05),方法间一致性较弱(一致性限>±3.5%)。此外,当使用各组内每种方法评估% BF平均值时,观察到仅在老年组中DXA和Pollock 7SF之间的估计值之间没有显着差异。结论:因此,7SF法和BIA法都不能有效估计被评估样本的体脂。有必要建立特定皮肤褶皱的方程来估计中老年妇女的BF %,并回顾BIA使用的方程。
Validity of the estimated body fat percentage by bioimpedance and skinfolds in middle-aged and elderly women
Objectives: Verify the validity of electrical bioimpedance (BIA) and the skinfold method in estimating the percentage of body fat (% BF) in middle-aged and elderly women, using dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. Material and methods: The sample consisted of 106 volunteers (middle age, n = 58 [51.3 ± 4.9 years] and elderly, n = 48 [67.2 ± 5.8 years]). The volunteers were submitted to anthropometric assessments and the % BF was subsequently calculated using the Jackson and Pollock 7 skinfold protocol (7SF). The % BF was also measured using BIA and DXA. Pearson’s correlation, Bland and Altman method, effect size and repeated-measure t-test were used to test the hypotheses. Results: Although there is a moderate positive relationship between the methods evaluated for middle-aged women (DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.67; DXA vs BIA, r = 0.62) and moderate to strong for the elderly (DXA vs 7SF, r = 0.57; DXA vs BIA, r = 0.75) (p ≤ 0.05 in all analyzes), the agreement between the methods was weak (limits of agreement > ± 3.5%). Additionally, when assessing the % BF mean using each method within the groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference between the estimates only between DXA and Pollock 7SF in the elderly group. Conclusion: Therefore, both the 7SF method and the BIA are not valid for estimating body fat in the sample evaluated. It is necessary to develop equations for specific skinfolds to estimate the % BF of middle-aged and elderly women and review the equations used by the BIA.